Amerika’s Future is Death

Article by Dr. Paul Craig Roberts
“The day we see truth and do not speak is the day we begin to die.”
– Martin Luther KingEnglish: Seal of the United States Department ...

Conspiracy theories have now blossomed into what the smug presstitute media calls a “conspiracy culture.” According to the presstitutes, Americans have to find some explanation for their frustrations and failings, so Americans shift the blame to the Bilderbergers, the Rothschilds, the New World Order and so forth and so on.

Readers will not be surprised that I disagree with the presstitutes. Indeed, the conspiracy culture is the product of the presstitute media’s failure to investigate and to report truthfully. I am certain that the Western media is worse than the Soviet media was. The Soviet media devised ways for helping the public to read between the lines, whereas the Western media is so proud to be confidants of the government that they deliver the propaganda without any clues to the readers that it is propaganda.

Americans have been fed lies by “their” government and the government’s presstitute media for so long that it is not surprising that Americans increasingly believe that there is a conspiracy operating against them. Millions of Americans have been evicted from their jobs, careers, and homes while the crooks who stole from them run free and bankroll the presidential candidates. The world as millions of Americans knew it has come to an end, and no one has been held accountable. The explanation that Americans get from the media is that it is their own fault. They bought houses they shouldn’t have bought, and they didn’t train for the right jobs. It is not unreasonable for Americans to conclude that a conspiracy is operating against them.

Americans are told that “their” government cannot afford to help them because of the budget deficit and the burden on our grandchildren. But Americans see the trillions of dollars that are lavished on banksters, on wars, and on Homeland Security. Why is a police state and another attack on another Muslim country more important than keeping Americans in their jobs and in their homes?

Cover of "9/11 [Region 2]"

The 11th anniversary of 9/11 is less than a month away. Will the presstitute media remind Americans that the government has spent $6 trillion of Americans’ money in out-of-pocket and already incurred future costs as the expense of invading and trying to occupy Afghanistan and Iraq, all to no effect except to enrich the managements and shareholders of the military security complex at the cost of destroying the reputation of the United States and putting Social Security and Medicare on the chopping block?

No, of course not. The spiel will be about our brave troops who are fighting and dying to make the world safe for democracy and women’s rights. Washington will wrap itself in the flag and exhort Americans to “support our troops” in the orchestrated war of the day. Hitlery Clinton still gets on the moral high horse and rails at China and Russia, but all the world sees is hypocrisy. No one, not even Washington’s puppet governments, any longer takes Washington’s moralizing as anything more than a mask for domination by force alone. Democracy, Washington declares, comes out of the barrel of a gun.

Today moralizing is all about money, but not for the 99%. The 99% cannot find good jobs or earn anything on their savings, because the economy is run for the 1%. University graduates cannot get jobs and pay off their student loans. Retraining for the millions of Americans whose jobs were shipped offshore or filled by foreigners brought in on H1-B visas has proved to be a fraud, as there are no jobs for the retrained displaced long-term discouraged American work force. The official jobs projection by the US government is that few university graduates are needed in the work force, so the old mantra that “education is the answer” is just another lie from the Ivy League economic departments who sell the establishment’s lies for money.

Any American citizen accustomed to travel America’s “wide open spaces” prior to 9/11 must be astonished by the sudden rise of the intrusive Homeland Security, a gestapo-sounding name if there ever was one. Porno-scans and genital feel-ups have spread from airports to bus and train stations and to the public highways, despite the absence of terrorist events. No one in their right mind could possibly think that a 90-year old grandmother in a wheel chair is a terrorist whose diaper needs to be checked or that blond and blue-eyed parents would have strapped a bomb around their 5-year old daughter’s waist. No one except the gestapo Department of Homeland Security.

Gestapo pins

Even some of the gullible flag-waving patriotic conservatives are beginning to wonder about all the security. The reports that the Department of Homeland Security has ordered 750 million rounds of people-killing ammunition are puzzling even those conservatives who have been taking vicarious pleasure in the slaughter of “towelheads.”

Why does the Department of Homeland Security need enough ammunition to shoot every American 2.5 times? Why is Homeland Security equipping itself with full-body armor? Why is Homeland Security acquiring new laser technology that can “instantly know everything about you from 164 feet away?” A new army manual for “Civil Disturbance Operations” describes how the military is to be used domestically within the US to put down protests, confiscate firearms and kill citizens.

The police state that is being constructed in “freedom and democracy” America is without parallel in history. When the only terrorists are dupes organized by the FBI, it is clear that the purpose of the police state is not to protect Americans from Muslim terrorists. The purpose of the police state is to terrorize US citizens.

It is not only Homeland Security that is being militarized. The government reported that a large ammunition order was made by the National Weather Service, later updated to have been the Fisheries Office. If you are surprised at this, why has the Social Security Administration ordered 174,000 rounds of hollow-point bullets?

continue at PaulCraigRoberts.org:

Fair Use Notice: This post contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

Romley-Stewart: Stover’s revelations about your name in Capital Letters

Read below and learn how Romley- Stewart: Stover applied this 1899 Law in Court to have his hearings quashed. The attachment reveals how your name in all capital letters can be manipulated by corporations to enslave individuals. Everytime you get a bill or notice in ALL UPPER CASE, take the opportunity to claim your rights and status. Radio Interview with Romley at bottom of page.

CRIMINAL CODE 1899 – SECT 514
514 Personation in general
(1) Any person who, with intent to defraud any person, falsely represents himself or herself to be some other person, living or dead, real or fictitious, is guilty of an offence which, unless otherwise stated, is a misdemeanour, and the person is liable to imprisonment for 3 years.
(2) If the representation is that the offender is a person entitled by will or operation of law to any specific property, and the person commits the offence with intent to obtain such property or possession thereof, the person is guilty of a crime, and is liable to imprisonment for 14 years.

Subject: the Truth to our enslavement
Author: Red Dragon
Date: 24 Jan

GOLDEN THREAD View profile
More options Oct 20 2011, 9:44 am

Caricature of Sir John Bridge (1824-1900). Cap...

Thanks for your email and your understanding of what I was saying.  It was very important for me to receive your blessing if you could put it that way.  I was just unlucky enough to discover how wrong the so-called Australian Government operated, (Including the so-called States of Australia)

My friend Cecil Ronald Rhodes told me something was wrong with the governing system a few years ago and he was working with a few other people trying all sorts of things in Court to work out what is going on, he was locked up for 6 months without charge but he was aware of the fraud. At that time, they didn’t click onto the two names appearing on documents: CECIL RONALD RHODES and the name: RHODES CECIL RONALD. (trust Law)

I had a Child Custody case and after nearly 3 years of being railroaded in court, very long story cut short, I questioned the name on the court order: “FEDERAL MAGISTRATE WILLIS”

When I asked the person sitting on the bench, her name, she claimed: “Federal Magistrate Willis” and then I asked how she got a first name like: Federal”. She then said that Federal was not her name and then I asked her why she lied about her name in a court room because if she made a claim in a court room that her name was “Federal Magistrate Willis” then why should I not believe her?

I then asked her if she lied?

She shit herself! … I then asked her if she was the one that autographed the court order seal to the name: FEDERAL MAGISTRATE WILLIS, and the Autograph looked like “J Willis”. I held it up so she could see it .. she refused to answer and then claimed, “I’m not going to answer that” then I asked if the name: FEDERAL MAGISTRATE WILLIS was registered at Births Deaths and Marriages or was it a fictitious name!

Sweden has adopted legislation that will give ...

She went quiet and looked really worried and then the Guard came over to me and asked me to stop?

I then said to the guard, “I don’t know you! who are you?” and then I said, if you touch me or my recorder I will call the federal police and then I pointed at the Magistrate Willis and said to her, “that goes for you too, I don’t know who you are!” and at that point she took off out of the Court room leaving the federal court in shock! There was a lawyer for my child and another one for the mother of my child.

All I asked for in the beginning was that the court identify the statute that I breached in relation to the family Law Act in order that they can take away my fatherly right to see my child 50 50? and they could not identify one breach of the statute.

After 3 years and 6 applications to try and remove a 50 50 custody, I had done some research on what a “Magistrate” is and they have to be lawfully appointed in PERSON! (Not as a man) and then I found that the federal Court Of Australia belonged to a Company? COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA, when can a company have a sovereign court? and how can a PERSON lawfully exist without subject matter? it can’t!

When I tried to find the lawful appointment of the person sitting on the bench: JOSEPHINE ANNE WILLIS, I couldn’t! and that meant, according to the Blacks Law Dictionary, that the magistrate was not lawfully appointed but might be in violation of Personage, personating a Magistrate?.

About 4 days after that scary court case where the so-called: FEDERAL MAGISTRATE WILLIS ran out of the court room, Mr. Boyd, the Registrar from the Federal Magistrates Court of Australia rang me from Sydney and asked me to come into the Court but just for a chat, no paperwork, ??? (Talked through speaker phone)

I said that I have had enough of this court because it’s destroyed my business, my work , my life was wrecked fighting court hearing after court hearing and I have not been paid one cent! I have had to defend every hearing for nearly 3 years and now I don’t even know who I’m fighting against???, I have not violated one of the family law acts! and that meant that the court had no jurisdiction to make any order over and above natural rights. When I went in for the meeting with Mr. Boyd, I asked him why the Court Orders have been signed with a fictitious name and asked him if that was a violation of the Queensland Criminal Code Act: 1899:  Personage?

He asked me not to say anything else in front of the other 3 lawyers in the room. That question also concerned the other lawyers but Mr. Boyd then said that the Court no longer wants to pursue the matter and asked me for permission if they could stop and vacate the whole thing????

I was stunned that it was all over in such a short time just by asking why the fictitious name: “FEDERAL MAGISTRATE WILLIS” appeared on the court order in stead of: the correct name: “Federal Magistrate: JOSEPHINE ANNE WILLIS” in order to identify the office and the person that sits in the office.

I asked if the Court order was lawfully valid?

That was the beginning of realizing that the designation of the name must be where the fraud exists.

 

LGMAC2011_3640

EXAMPLE 2 – ERGON ENERGY
The next thing that made me wonder what was going on was when ERGON ENERGY QUEENSLAND PTY LTD took me: ROMLEY STEWART STOVER, to Court over my electricity bill.

I asked Ergon Energy to issue my bill to my correct name: “ROMLEY STEWART STOVER” instead of the name on the bill: “MR R S STOVER”….My home had 3 electricity meters and in Queensland, they put an ambulance levy on each electricity meter so I ask them if they could take the levy off 2 of the meters and leave it only on one meter because only my daughter and I lived at the house at that time and 3 levy’s added up to nearly $300 instead of $98 a year. The other meters were for 2 sheds, when I re-wired the house to bring the wiring up the health standards, I just left the meters there because they were always there.

They refused! to drop the fee of the other two maters and made me pay 3 levy’s ..? This was unfair but I had no remedy, just pay! … so they then told me to rewire the place back to one meter at my expense, I had just rewired the whole meter board and they wanted me to re-wire it again? … totally wrong with no compassion or human understanding.

So again , to cut a long story short, when I asked Ergon Energy to send the bill to my lawful name: ROMLEY STEWART STOVER, in order to defend my claim in court against a lawful bill, they refused! because the name: “MR R S STOVER” made no legal sense, the name should have been: Mr. R. S. Stover, in the correct English if they wanted to use the “Mr.” or send it to my correct lawful name: ROMLEY STEWART STOVER. How can I defend or even claim the false name: MR R S STOVER?

Well I won! but only after being threatened with indefinite prison if I didn’t pay the bill, and in the end, I put my hands together like praying, and asked the Magistrate to please help me settle this account.

Then he said “Well why don’t you just pay the bill?”

I said, ” because I don’t have a bill! the existing bill is not issued to my correct lawful name and the name: “MR R S STOVER” was not my name”. It’s a violation of section 514 of the Criminal Code Act 1899: Personage, to claim a fictitious name and the designation: “MR R S STOVER” is legally the designation of a name because of how it appeared in all uppercase, but it has no subject matter, rendering such a name as a fictitious false name-trust..

The magistrate nearly fell of his chair, he didn’t know what to say, then he just claimed: “Mr. Stover deserves the right to have his bill issued to his true correct lawful name” and then said to me: “Sorry for the inconvenience I have caused you today Mr. Stover, you may go”

Again, that was over a year of writing and research …. It’s all in the Name again! …  (The Ambulance Levy has now been abandoned by the so-called State Government.)

This means that every person sitting in Parliament and Government sits under a false name! as I have explained in that document, Even every person that sits on the bench as Magistrates and Judges are questionable! they have no jurisdiction over the birth right people, only jurisdiction over the fiction person on the Passport and Driver license!

It’s a fraud not only against the original people of Australia, it’s a fraud on every human born to this land including the original blood.  I was never trying to claim the land or any right from the original people or from any people.

I don’t want to take over the country, all I did was discover the most criminal actions of these people assuming to govern us in the hope that justice can be given to people who need it.

The Australian Passport and Queensland Driver License are instruments used to destroy the Sovereign Trust (Name) meaning the birth right. Every person that holds an Australian Passport can not prove that he/ she is a sovereign birth right person because their Passport and Driver license proves that they are not the sovereign birth right because the name on the Passport and Driver License are false twisted designations of the real name but your autograph and image appear on that instrument! it’s a forgery!

The so-called “sorry” to the original people by Kevin Rudd was a scam because he made it clear that “As Prime Minister, he was sorry for what they did to the Original People” but he didn’t say sorry from his true name: KEVIN MICHAEL RUDD, he said sorry under the false name: “KEVIN RUDD PM” and that name is a false-fake fraud! fiction so you could say the “Sorry” was a fiction and lawfully meant nothing …

Doesn’t matter if it hurts Black people or White people, a scam is a scam, a crime is a crime and both Black and White people are people!, humans, and both can be hurt by crime.!

How can we ever deal with anything with such a fraud government assuming power?

So thank-you very much for your email to me because I’m just like you, trying to find out what is wrong and why so many people are wronged without any compassion from this so called government.

When I asked Willy Brim from Kuranda (Black activist but a lovely man and he has always been a gentleman to me) about what I have discovered, he said what you have said, “You finally worked it out!” … He knew!

Some form of Sovereign Council that represents the people of Australia and not the Alien-fictitions, must be formed, this can’t go on like this, it’s criminal and I noticed massive riots in Wall Street, all about the theft of the Sovereign Wealth by unknown corporate entities, and this is what it’s all about …

The group of WHITE People! that I’m working with, are upset that this has happened so I think this is more than just about Black and White, this is about People, humans and the machine of Corporations that have no soul.

The Arny movie: “The Terminator” is the same thing but the machine is much more evil!, it’s the system with no soul or love or spirit of brotherhood between men that has taken over and as long as you are a good slave you will be ok but if you become aware, you become the enemy to them … A corporation is in effect, a machine.

Thank you so much *** for your email, you are another man who made me ask questions and research the law dictionary to find out if what you were saying was true and as far as I can see, you are right!, the governing system is evil .. really wrong,

ROMLEY ON FAIRDINKUM RADIO:  http://fairdinkumradio.com/resources/110512RS.mp3

Huge Win in Qld Court over Speeding Fine

Article mirrored from Truthology website

Special Emergency Response Team (Queensland)

As posted earlier below as a teaser by Mark Darwin, we can confirm that YES we had a Truthology member WIN in the magistrates court here in Queensland yesterday when arguing the legitimacy of a traffic camera speeding fine.

This victory could potentially have wide-ranging effects as a precedent. Why? Because it shows what we have suspected: it is highly unlikely that the Queensland Police are unable to issue any traffic camera infringement notices in the manner they have been doing so for as long as can work out …… perhaps since inception! That said, sadly, it will probably be short-lived as I’m certain that they will move VERY quickly to shut this down without doubt!

But nevertheless, it is a significant win, and perhaps the beginning of the winds of change in bringing reform to our system.

The man challenging the infringement issued to him, and doing the arguing, was no other than WA Lawyer Warren Black, a fellow Truth teacher and Truthology member, and we can assure you that he was on fire yesterday in the court !

Let me tell you, it takes big balls to walk into THEIR court and challenge them head on, especially when it has to do with their ‘lawful and legal’ ability (under their interpretation) as to whether or not they have the right to do so, and especially as he has so much to lose being a lawyer presently licensed under their system. He performed admirably to say the least, I was there, and enjoyed every minute of it.

The alleged infringement was issued by the QLD Police, and was for the sum of $150 and a loss of 3 points, for allegedly exceeding the posted speed limit by only 14kms per hour.

Coat of Arms of Queensland

Coat of Arms of Queensland (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

It was quite amusing that in the early stages of the trial, a young police prosecutor spoke directly to Warren. He tried belittling the attempt as a complete waste of time and resources for all concerned, that Warren should just pay the fine and be done with it, and had little chance of success, and the result for the effort did not warrant Warrens outcome! Needless to say, Warren let that slide and continued on with the matter at hand.

Now in this instance, Warren was arguing a number of points. The main issue that Warren was arguing was that the infringement was issued under the personal name of the officer concerned, a local Police Sergeant, supposedly on behalf of the Queensland Police force. However, as Warren pointed out, there is currently NO AUTHORITY or LEGISLATION in Queensland of any sort in place the grants this person, the right to do so, and even if it did, it must be clear that the police officer is doing the prosecution on behalf of the relevant authority, eg. Queensland Police, the Crown or State.

An example or analogy of this argument is, as the magistrate pointed out to the police during the trial, “what would stop me as the magistrate, Mr Bloggs, from going to a Justice of the Peace and stating that i saw you doing 75km per hour in and 60km zone, and then issuing a summons against you? There has to be some authority or head of power to do this!”

The Police tried to duck and dive, and circumvent this in every way possible, bringing up other issues, but to the Magistrate’s credit, he remained firm and told the Police to answer Warren’s question and provide the relevant proof.  Warren also raised some other points.

Queensland Police Service Traffic Branch Commo...

Queensland Police Service Traffic Branch Commodore SV6 Sportswagon (Photo credit: Highway Patrol Images)

He raised the point that the Queensland Police, SPUR, the Crown, the Queensland Government, are separate entities, yet somehow all involved in the issued infringement. He raised the point that for an entity or Government to raise an infringement, it had to be written in legislation as under any kind of criminal law, an offence had to be clearly specified, and the chain of legislative authority as to who ultimately prosecuted had to be clear. He wanted clarified as to who was who, and what role they all played in this infringement, and where they were mentioned in legislation or regulations. Again, to the Magistrate’s credit, he agreed with Warren, however this argument was not explored in-depth, nor was it ruled upon.

He also raised the point that if the matter was criminal and not civil, the issue was, who was harmed and suffered loss as a result of the alleged infringement and who was the accuser in the matter? (as previously outlined in our website templates) If the Police Sergeant issued the charge, was he personally harmed, and if not, who was harmed, and which entity did he represent! Again the Magistrate agreed, and insisted the Police show their authority.

What was amusing was there were 5 (FIVE) Police officers in the court yesterday, including the head of Brisbane’s Traffic Camera Branch (so we believe). The trial went from 9.30am till 3pm with more than 6 adjournments, (requested by the police) so that they could find ANY legislation or Authority (which they couldn’t) to hang their hat on and make their case. They literally tried EVERYTHING to find it….. let me assure you it was EMBARRASSING to watch them squirm for SO long and the prosecutor was forever saying…”can we just adjourn for 5 minutes so i can ring my boss”…SERIOUSLY !!!

The lengths they went to were extraordinary, and they even tried to withdraw the infringement, and issue a ‘bench warrant’ on the spot to get around it. As correctly pointed out by the Magistrate, this action would be an abuse of process and he instantly rejected it!

Queensland Police Service Toyota Aurion SX6

Queensland Police Service Toyota Aurion SX6 (Photo credit: Highway Patrol Images)

What was fantastic about this case was the Magistrate was very fair and unbiased and was firm on both Warren and the Police about procedural fairness, and following the law. He seemed quite amused at the police incompetence in trying to justify their position, and granted them more than enough time and adjournments to try and get a result. He even appeared to give them a chance to withdraw the charge, which they refused to do, and at one stage, he suggested to Warren with some humour that he may wish to “plead guilty to bring this veil of tears to an end”!

Ultimately the Police dodged a bullet, as the matter was won on another issue. The Police tried to adduce camera evidence, however, Warren challenged it on the basis that the Police had not provided him with witness statements from the camera operator. The Magistrate agreed, and excluded the evidence, so the Police had no evidence to base a charge. The Magistrate proceeded to dismiss the charges, and then grant all costs to Warren for his troubles.

Warren literally had them on the back foot for the entire trial, and then slowly on the ropes, then on their knees, and finally WHAMO …..KO’d !!!!!! a truly fantastic result.

It is important to note, that in Western Australia, they DO have this power outlined in their legislation. You can bet after yesterdays court win, that Queensland will pass similar legislation for future use … so if you are challenging speeding fines now… and want to use this argument and be QUICK about it!…. you will have to check for yourselves in all other states.

What also happened was Warren and I had a number of talks with the Police there, and as time went on , we became more and more friendly. Warren made it clear to the Police that he was totally supportive of road safety, however, he did not agree with a system that undermined the rights of citizens, and swung the balance to favour in favour of the Police. What was interesting was a few of the Police agreed with us, and were very open to where we were coming from!

A sad indictment of how lawyers “do government”

Article by James Johnson:  Former Barrister of the High Court of Australia
A Clear Insight into Australia’s Openly Fascist Political (and) Legal System

Ethics and Morals: Timeless and Universal?

Ethics and Morals: Timeless and Universal? (Photo credit: stephenccwu)

I have never stolen a penny of clients monies. Nor have I ever cheated on my taxes. Nor has the legal regulator ever, in 22 years, received a single complaint against me from any of my many prestigious clients or former clients. Nor have I ever committed or been charged or been prosecuted for any serious (or even trivial) criminal offence. Yet if the Victorian Civil and Administrative Claims Tribunal rubber stamps the irrefutably corrupt and failed Legal Services Commissioner’s unauthorised and illegal reprisal application this week or next, as it clearly wants to and will, I will become the first lawyer from any Top 10 Australian international law firm ever to be struck out of the profession. I will also join a growing list of human rights lawyers struck off, far from doing anything wrong, but for doing plenty that is virtuous and right. If claiming my whistleblowing scalp is what it takes to be the last will and testament of this corrupt and failed legal regulator, if this is what it takes to finally trigger Spring Street to spring into action, well in the scheme of things that is a small (and repairable) personal and political sacrifice for these insipid government agencies to make of me … ☞☞☞ …

Dear Supporter
LAWYEROCRACY ON TRIAL / THE 21 MAY PROJECT
A. MONDAY 6 AUGUST 2012 – NEXT LAWYEROCRACY ON TRIAL HEARING

I am writing to thank you for supporting me at previous VCAT hearings on 21 May 2012 and 6 July 2012 in my quest to (a) clear my name from false assertions of professional misconduct levelled at me by a corrupt legal regulator; and (b) to compel the legal regulator to investigate several dozen instances of professional misconduct (blackmail and fraud, perjury and the like) committed against me [as they are committed against 100s of other Australians every day].

Unfortunately the legal regulator’s zeal to invade my personal private legal affairs, on the false premises of “regulating the conduct of legal services providers” “for the protection of consumers of legal services” are matched by his zeal for refusing to police dozens of genuine instances of professional misconduct by paid legal professionals – mostly, I may add, paid by the Government precisely for the purpose of beating me up and whistleblocking me.

The next hearing in this lawless VCAT vigilante is scheduled for 10 am on Monday (this Monday, the 6th of August 2012) at 55 King Street Melbourne, Australia. I am hoping that as many of you as possible will be able to make it to the hearing in Melbourne to show your support. Let’s pack the public gallery again for the third hearing in a row, and show these government tyrants that we don’t like their business, and that we are “on to them”.

The “trial” is scheduled to resume at an interesting stage of development on 3 – 5 September 2012. But the reality is, that with upwards of 200 defence witnesses, requiring 100s of days to testify (and all of the 100s of days of preparation that precedes that), this year long trial will probably not be ready to commence until mid 2013.

Here are links to two letters that I have written to the Victorian Government in its various manifestations this week in pursuit of my rights “to have an Attorney appointed by the State” and responding to attempts by these bureaucrats to obstruct (by armed force) public access to these public hearings, and to hinder my presentation of “my case” against the State.

Click to read more.

I know God is giggling …!!!

A Florida Court Sets Atheist Holy Day!
Gotta love this Judge!
You must read this……  A proper decision by the courts… for a change.
A FLORIDA COURT SETS ATHEIST HOLY DAY

april fools 2010

In Florida , an atheist created a case against Easter and Passover Holy days. He hired an attorney to bring a discrimination case against Christians and Jews and observances of their holy days. The argument was that it was unfair that atheists had no such recognized days.

The case was brought before a judge. After listening to the passionate presentation by the lawyer, the judge banged his gavel declaring, “Case dismissed!”

The lawyer immediately stood and objecting to the ruling saying,

Your honor, How can you possibly dismiss this case? The Christians have Christmas, Easter and others.

The Jews have Passover, Yom Kippur and Hanukkah, yet my client and all other atheists have no such holidays…”

The judge leaned forward in his chair saying, “But you do. Your client, counselor, is woefully ignorant.”

The lawyer said,” Your Honor, we are unaware of any special observance or holiday for atheists.”

The judge said, “The calendar says April 1st is April Fool’s Day. Psalm 14:1 states, ‘The fool says in his heart, there is no God.’ Thus, it is the opinion of this court, that, if your client says there is no God, then he is a fool. Therefore, April 1st is his day.

Court is adjourned…”

You gotta love a Judge that knows his scripture!

Revelation: Hitler warned of the New World Order

Mussolini (left) and Hitler sent their armies ...

Mussolini (left) and Hitler sent their armies to North Africa and into Egypt against the British (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

SOME LIGHT READING!

Kevin John Field – August 15, 2012

First, I should like to say a little about myself so as to explain how I know what follows. I was lucky enough to get a good education because my parents could afford it, I went to university at a time when it was unusual and then joined the intelligence community.

I had an uneventful career until a mild stroke left me with a slight speech impediment and I was assigned to archives during the final years before my retirement.

The World War II archive section is closed off from view and most is now converted for computers in the restricted section, but on rare occasions I did have access to read up on the war and how it happened.  Forget everything you read in the history books. Politicians habitually lie so swine flu, Weapons of Mass Destruction, Kennedy’s assassination, the moon landings, Iran, the banking crisis, the Holocaust – none of it is the way it is portrayed in the media.

Late in 1941 the German Luftwaffe dropped pamphlets over the Liverpool area, we had one of these in the files and in it Hitler tried to warn the British people about the coming New World Order. He asked them to stop attacking Germany, and realize that Jewish bankers controlled the Soviet menace and Russia and its Jews were the common enemy. The pamphlet went on that Britain should keep its empire, while the US was demanding we give it up. Hitler wanted a strong Britain against Russia and the Jewish bankers, and he warned of Winston Churchill’s desire to turn the Germany versus Russia conflict into another world war for international Jewry.

America was planned to come into the war from day one and Roosevelt knew it.

Because Hitler was the only man in the world to stand up to Russia and its Jewish controllers, many in the USA and Britain initially supported him, until it was made a crime.

Let’s look from these files and some fallacies about who Hitler was.

1. He was not a Rothschild: recently the Hitler family grave and the headstone was moved, part of this was to do DNA tests, resulting in no sign of any blood links to the Rothschilds.

2. Hitler wanted to rule the world: more nonsense, he wanted to re-unite the German speaking peoples. Britain had spies right through the Third Reich and officially our intelligence said Hitler was a threat to Russia not Britain.

3. Hitler was a cruel psychopath: he was very tough yes, but Hitler loved animals and children and all animal experimentation was outlawed during his premiership. However, he did bring in a euthanasia law that ruled that the severely handicapped should be given euthanasia. Churchill also agreed with this policy.

4. He was sexually malformed and a homosexual: Hitler’s doctor Theodor Morell claimed Hitler had wounds from WWI but was not malformed, and definitely not homosexual. In fact any sexual perversion could land you into the work camps. There is a book which purports to be by Doctor Theodor Morells but don’t bother reading this.

5. Natzi is abbreviated from zionazi: not true this really comes from Nationalsozialismus, or National Socialism, which meant the money in that country for the benefit of the people in that country, not international Jewish money-brokers, Natzi is also short for Nazerite or follower of Jesus of Nazareth.

6. Hitler was a British agent: more nonsense. Hitler loved the British people and its cultural way of life and saw all Anglo-Saxons as brothers, but was totally committed to the German resistance to the Jewish takeover that held Russia, Britain and America.

7. The camps were death camps where people were gassed to death: not true, the camps were for criminals and those who did not support Germany, these people were made to work allowing German nationals to concentrate on the war effort. It should be said that Rothschilds who funded the war effort refused to help the Jews in the camps, despite Hitler asking several times to discuss this. So when you see emotive hate films about WWII and the Holocaust see it in the context of the propaganda it really is.

8. Angela Merkel is not Hitler’s daughter as claimed, this is so childish as to be laughable.

9 Why did Hitler hate Jews? Hitler’s chauffer and one of his chefs were Jews, two of the most trusted job in Germany during the war. Moreover, 150,000 Jews served in the German armed forces during WWII <http://www.kansaspress.ku.edu/righit.html> .

So Hitler did not hate Jews, just those who hated Germany. Incidentally as well as 150,000 non-Zionist Jews <http://just-another-inside-job.blogspot.co.uk/2007/04/150-000-jews-in-hitlers-army.html> , many Indian volunteers also served in the German Wehrmacht <http://www.feldgrau.com/azadhind.html> .

10 Rothschild persuaded Churchill not to bomb German factories, as he wanted to seize them as war reparations. So the war was taken to the wives and families of German soldiers, in an effort to break Germany utterly and completely.

Transcript Of Julian Assange Speech From Ecuador Embassy In London August 20

Julian Assange Speech Ecuador Embassy

Julian Assange, from Wikileaks, at the SKUP co...

Read the full transcript of Julian Assange’s speech from the Ecuadorian Embassy in London, on August 20.  

Julian Assange: I am here because I cannot be closer to you.  Thank you for being here.  Thanks you for your resolve and your generosity of spirit.

On Wednesday night, after a threat was sent to this embassy and the police descended on the building, you came out in the middle of the night to watch over it, and you brought the world’s eyes with you.  Inside the embassy after dark I could hear teams of police swarming up into the building through the internal fire escape. But I knew that there would be witnesses.  And that is because of you.

If the UK did not throw away the Vienna conventions the other that is because the world was watching.  And the world was watching because you were watching.  The next time somebody tells you that it is pointless to defend those rights we hold dear, remind them of your vigil in the dark before the Embassy Of Ecuador, and how in the morning the sun came up on a different world and a courageous and a courageous Latin American nation took a stand for justice.

And so to those brave people I thank President Correa for the courage he has shown in considering and granting me political asylum.  And so I thank the government and the Foreign Minister Ricardo Patino who have upheld the Ecuadorian constitution and its notion of universal rights in their consideration of my case.  And to the Ecuadorian people for supporting and defending this constitution. And I have a debt of gratitude to the staff of this embassy whose families live in London and who have shown me hospitality and kindness despite the threats that they received.

This Friday there will be an emergency meeting of the foreign ministers of Latin America in Washington DC to address this situation. And so I am grateful to the people and governments of Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Columbia, El Salvador, Honduras, Mexico, Nicaragua, Peru, Venezuela and to all of the other Latin American countries who have come to defend the right to asylum.

To the people of the United States, the United Kingdom, Sweden and Australia who have supported me in strength even when their governments have not and to those wiser heads in government who are still fighting for justice your day will come.  To the staff, supporters and sources of Wikileaks whose courage and commitment and loyalty has seen no equal.  To my family and to my children who have been denied their father forgive me we will be reunited soon.

As Wikileaks stands under threat so does the freedom of expression and the health of our societies. We must use this moment to articulate the choice that is before the government of the United States of America.  Will it return to and reaffirm the values it was founded on? Or will it lurch off the precipice dragging us all into a dangerous and oppressive world in which journalists fall silent under the fear of prosecution and citizens must whisper in the dark?  I say that it must turn back.

I ask President Obama to do the right thing. The United States must renounce its witch-hunt against Wikileaks.  The United States must dissolve its FBI investigation.

English: Julian Assange and Daniel Domscheit-B...

English: Julian Assange and Daniel Domscheit-Berg Deutsch: Julian Assange und Daniel Domscheit-Berg (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

The United States must vow that it will not seek to prosecute our staff or our supporters.  The United States must pledge before the world that it will not pursue journalists for shining a light on the secret crimes of the powerful.

There must be no more foolish talk about prosecuting any media organisation be it Wikileaks or the New York Times.

The US administration’s war on whistleblowers must end.

Thomas Drake and William Binney and John Kiriakou and the other heroic US whistleblowers must – they must – be pardoned and compensated for the hardships they have endured as servants of the public record. And the Army Private who remains in a military prison in Fort Levenworth Kansas who was found by the UN to have endured most torturous detention in Quantico Virginia and who has yet after two years in the prison to see a trial must be released.

Seal of the United States Department of State.

Seal of the United States Department of State. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

And if Bradley Manning really did as he is accused he is a hero an example to us all and one of the world’s foremost political prisoners. Bradley Manning must be released.  On Wednesday Bradley Manning spent his 815th day of detention without trial. The legal maximum is 120 days.

On Thursday my friend Nabeel Rajah was sentenced to three years for a tweet. On Friday a Russian band were sentenced to two years in jail for a political performance.

There is unity in the oppression. There must be absolute unity and determination in the response.