District Court Ruling Illegal, Perverse and Irrational

Irrational Games

Irrational Games (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

 

Hi everyone,

 

Further to my blog on my front home page, the matter 3872/12 ruled on Monday 29th July was totally illegal, perverse and irrational.  I will be putting up all the information on the website shortly.  I spent yesterday thinking up a plan of attack – I have two or four weeks for an appeal.  My head is in a spin at the moment, and because I have to prepare my appeal papers, and consult some friends, I don’t expect to get up all the info onto the website until after this has been finished in a week or so.  Its now Wednesday afternoon, and I’ve just been listening to the University of You Tube and tidying up my desk, ready for the next onslaught of paperwork for the Supreme Court of Appeal.  

 

Will update with more info shortly

 

 

Edward Snowden links Australian Installations to NSA

Edward Snowden

Edward Snowden (Photo credit: DonkeyHotey)

Article Mirrored from Citizens Electoral Council

Five Eyes’ spy ring—pick the odd man out

America’s National Security Agency (NSA) whistleblower Edward Snowden has revealed the Australian installations that are part of the NSA’s global infrastructure for spying on the broad civilian population—at Pine Gap, Shoal Bay near Darwin, Geraldton, and HMAS Harman outside Canberra.

MikeCriss Blog - Pine Gap

MikeCriss Blog – Pine Gap (Photo credit: mikecrissflick)

More significant are Snowden’s telling observations on how the NSA functions within the intelligence-sharing alliance America has with the UK, Canada, Australia and New Zealand, known as the “Five Eyes” alliance.

All four of those countries share the same head of state—Queen Elizabeth, who holds massive, undemocratic “reserve” powers over each of them, especially their military / intelligence structures.

(For instance, in 1977 South Australia’s Police Commissioner Harold Salisbury refused to disclose to the state’s Premier, Don Dunstan, the community-monitoring, i.e. spying, activities of the police force’s intelligence-gathering division called Special Branch, which was also the force’s liaison to ASIO. Salisbury insisted he was not accountable to the democratically-elected government, but only to the Queen and the wider intelligence community. Dunstan sacked Salisbury, and a subsequent Royal Commission found in Dunstan’s favour, but the fact remains that in this and other instances, the intelligence agencies regarded themselves as above the authority of the elected government, accountable only to the Crown.)

The 8 July Sydney Morning Herald reported the relevant parts of the latest Snowden revelations, which show that the most egregious incidents of spying on citizens occur in the UK:

Eye death

Eye death (Photo credit: @Doug88888)

“Mr Snowden said that the other partners in the ‘Five Eyes’ intelligence alliance of the US, United Kingdom, Canada, Australia and New Zealand ‘sometimes go even further than the [National Security Agency] people themselves.’

“He highlighted the British Government Communications Headquarters ‘Tempora’ program as an example: ‘Tempora is the first “I save everything” approach (“full take”) in the intelligence world. It sucks in all data, no matter what it is, and which rights are violated by it. … Right now, the system is capable of saving three days’ worth of traffic, but that will be optimised. Three days may perhaps not sound like a lot, but it’s not just about connection metadata. “Full take” means that the system saves everything. If you send a data packet and if makes its way through the UK, we will get it. If you download anything, and the server is in the UK, then we get it.’

President Barack Obama signs the executive ord...

President Barack Obama signs the executive order establishing the White House Office of Faith-Based and Neighborhood Partnerships. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

“Mr Snowden also argued that the ‘Five eyes’ partnerships are organised so that authorities in each country can ‘insulate their political leaders from the backlash’ when it became public ‘how grievously they’re violating global privacy’.”

Luxembourgian-registered NATO E-3 AWACS flying...

Luxembourgian-registered NATO E-3 AWACS flying with three American Air Force F-16 Fighting Falcon fighter aircraft in a NATO exercise (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

The question must be asked, who is running this spy ring? Are the four British Commonwealth nations part of the NSA’s ring, or is the NSA part of the British Crown’s intelligence network? History shows that when it comes to secretive government and espionage, Britain is the master, and the U.S. is the apprentice.

Quest for Murrawarri Republic

The Media Release below from the Murrawarri republic shows the way forward for our Aboriginal nations to claim sovereignty over their traditional lands.  Michael Anderson then explains further that this action by Uncle Fred Hooper is not just a flash in the pan. (see below). i fully endorse the current push for the sovereignty of our nations.  More independent Aboriginal states in the pipeline.

MEDIA RELEASE
10TH May 2013

QUEEN RECOGNISES MURRAWARRI REPUBLIC

 Her Royal Highness Queen Elizabeth the Second the Queen of England and the Head of the Commonwealth recognises the Murrawarri Nations continued Independence and Statehood.

The Murrawarri peoples declared their continued Independence and Statehood on the 30th of March 2013 through their Declaration of Independence and Statehood. In line with the Murrawarri Republic draft constitution a People’s Council was formed and will act as the Provisional Government of the Murrawarri Republic.

On the 3rd of April 2013 the Murrawarri Peoples Council wrote to Her Royal Highness Queen Elizabeth the Second advising her of the declaration of the Murrawarri Nations continued Independence and Statehood and requested Her Royal Highness produce documents that show how Sovereignty, Dominion and Ultimate (Radical) Title was obtained over the Murrawarri Nation Ancient Lands, Waters, Subsurface, Natural Resources and Airspace under International and British Common Law.

The documents requested were:

  1. Treaty documents between the Murrawarri Nation and the Crown of Great Britain outlining the conditions of such a treaty,
  2. A Deed of Cession document  that show the Murrawarri Nation has ceded Sovereignty, Dominion and Ultimate (Radical)  to the Crown of Great Britain, or
  3. Documents showing a declaration of war against the Murrawarri Nation and its people by the Crown of Great Britain.

The Murrawarri Peoples Council also advised Her Royal Highness that if these documents cannot be produced within 28 days of receipt of this correspondence, we will make representation to the United Nations to be accepted as the world’s newest Independent Nation in line with United Nations protocols.

We have confirmation from Buckingham Palace that shows the Murrawarri Peoples Council letter was received on 10th of April 2013. The 28 days expired on the 8th of May 2013 and the Peoples Council of the Murrawarri have not received a response from Her Royal Highness.

By not producing these documents the Crown has affirmed the Murrawarri Republic to be a continued Free and Independent State, in line with International law and covenants,

The Peoples Council of the Murrawarri will write to the Secretary General of the United Nations requesting United Nation assistance in the development of a recovery framework for the repatriation of all Ancient Lands, Subsurface, Natural Resources, Waters and Airspace within the Murrawarri Boundaries to the Murrawarri Republic under United Nations Resolution 1541 (XV) VI:

The Council will be also making representation to the United Nations to be accepted as the world’s newest Nation.

Any enquiries can be directed to Mr Fred Hooper on 0427957960 or Email at mundaguddah@gmail.com

Aboriginal Embassy and Mount Ainslie 29-10-06

Aboriginal Embassy and Mount Ainslie 29-10-06 (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Goodooga, 20 May 2013 – – Aborigines who have just met for two days in Brisbane are looking to launching their own independent states, as the Murrawarri people have just done in northwest NSW and southwest Queensland.

“Clearly the people are now asking the pertinent questions relating to a process of asserting their continuing sovereignty as individual nations,” writes Michael Ghillar Anderson, Convenor of the Sovereign Union of First Nations and Peoples in Australia in a media release.

The last surviving 1972 founder of the Aboriginal Embassy in Canberra says the Brisbane treaty talks were “one of the best meetings that has been held on a single national issue, that I have attended for many years”.

Participants expressed great admiration for the steps taken by the Murrawarri Republic , Mr. Anderson writes, and they are now seeking further advice on processes they adopted for “this revolutionary action”. The participants would now make all efforts to follow the same or similar path.

“The participants of the conference and workshops know in their own hearts that this is what their Elders past have been seeking to achieve. Now the people are saying that now they need to make a greater effort to achieve what the Murrawarri have.”

There is to be another meeting in five weeks to further investigate domestic and legal positions for establishing “our own statehood under international law”. It would be open to all people considering these actions, including non-Aboriginal supporters.

Mr. Anderson points out that one thing holding people back from committing to the sovereignty movement is the question of citizenship rights and possible ramifications that may flow from it.

“One of the working points that was submitted in discussion was that, if post war immigrants are entitled to hold dual citizenship, which permits them to access all social benefits and then in retirement return to their own countries to live, such as Greece and Italy, and there continue to receive their social benefits, then so, too, can First Nations people within Australia have dual citizenship, that is they can be Anangu, Wokka Wokka etc and be Australians at the same time, thereby maintaining the benefits of that dual citizenship status.”

It was pointed out in a workshop that Aboriginal people seeking to declare their independence within their homelands need to return to Country. “Only those who live on Country are in a position to make such a Declaration of Independence.

But it was also important to understand, just as the Murrawarri Republic do, that they must also recognise the rights of their diaspora, that is, people who belong to that nation but choose to live outside of their Country, have the same rights as those living on Country, but are not immune from punishment for any offences committed against the law of the nation whose land they live on.

Mr. Anderson’s release in full:

Having attended a two-day Brisbane Treaty Talks conference and workshops on the continuing sovereignty of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples, I can say that the meeting is one of the best meetings that has been held on a single national issue, that I have attended for many years.

Clearly the people are now asking the pertinent questions relating to a process of asserting their continuing sovereignty as individual nations.

They expressed their great admiration for the steps taken by the Murrawarri Republic and are now seeking further advice in relation to the processes that were adopted by the Murrawarri People to have taken this revolutionary action. The participants have consented unanimously to investigating the processes adopted by the Murrawarri Republic and will now make all efforts to follow the same or similar path.

The participants of the conference and workshops know in their own hearts that this is what their Elders past have been seeking to achieve. Now the people are saying that now they need to make a greater effort to achieve what the Murrawarri have.

A number of considerations were made and there will be a further meeting in five weeks time where we will further investigate domestic and legal positions that establish the legal foundation to establish our own statehood under international law.

Again this meeting will be open to all people considering these actions including non-Aboriginal supporters. The suggested date and venue is:

22 – 23 June 2013
Murri School,
1277 Beaudesert Road,
Acacia Ridge , Brisbane

It must be pointed out, however, that one factor that does, in fact, hold the people back from committing to the sovereignty movement is the question of citizenship rights and the possible ramifications that may flow from it.

One of the working points that was submitted in discussion was that, if post war immigrants are entitled to hold dual citizenship, which permits them to access all social benefits and then in retirement return to their own countries to live, such as Greece and Italy, and there continue to receive their social benefits, then so, too, can First Nations people within Australia have dual citizenship, that is they can be Anangu, Wokka Wokka etc and be Australians at the same time, thereby maintaining the benefits of that dual citizenship status.

It was pointed out in the workshop that if Aboriginal people seek to declare their independence within their homelands, they need to return to Country. Only those who live on Country are in a position make such a Declaration of Independence.

It is also important to understand, just as the Murrawarri Republic do, they also recognise the rights of their diaspora, that is, people who belong to that nation, but who choose to live outside of their Country, have the same rights as those living on Country, but are not immune from punishment for any offences committed against the Nation’s Law whose land they live on.

An example of this is: if you are a Wokka Wokka citizen and you choose to live within the land of Jageara then you are subject to the Jagaera law if they have declared independence. If you are on land whose owners have not declared independence, then you are subject to the laws originating from Britain .

The next meeting agreed to by the participants will address three main topics:

• The declarations of independence themselves, models and processes

• Governance

• Transition times.

The fundamental social factors, legal jurisdictions and methodologies for implementation each fit within the transitional process. The duration of the transitional process is not set, as there is a realisation that people are at different stages in their own understanding. But it was agreed at these treaty talks that information kits on sovereignty and independence be developed for circulation. It was requested that within this information kit a manifesto be created, pointing out all recent and past judgements in the law courts of the former British empire that go to recognising Aboriginal rights.

It was pointed out that we must be cautious about espousing the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, as this Declaration requires First Nations Peoples to recognise the territorial integrity of the invader state. Alternatively, the majority of the rights defined in that UN Declaration are already included in UN Covenants and are recognised in international law. This includes the right of self-determination, without having to recognise the territorial integrity of the dominant state.

Another relevant international law, by way of a resolution from the UN General Assembly, is the 1970 Declaration on Friendly Relations that established the principles of equal rights and self-determination of peoples:

Every State has the duty to refrain from forcible action which deprives peoples…of their right to self-determination and freedom and independence. In their actions against, and resistance to, such forcible action in pursuit of the exercise of their right to self-determination, such peoples are entitled to seek and receive support in accordance with the purposes and principles of the Charter.

[Detailed in Principles VII-IX of United Nations General Assembly Resolution 1541]

We look forward to the next meeting and hope we can see a greater number attend as this is a sovereignty movement that will not be stopped. (For those who were unable to attend, the treaty talks were webcast live.)

On the question of treaties, the participants agreed that the first step should be that those Aboriginal nations, who declare independence, should treaty with each other on each other’s recognition and commit to each to give support, if and when necessary in the formation of their state. No doubt future gatherings will locate other matters we each will treaty on.

In relation to treatying with the Commonwealth Government of Australia, it is not in our interest to treaty with Australia at this point as our people first need to be fully informed about all their rights as sovereign and independent peoples.

Michael Ghillar Anderson
Convenor,
Sovereign Union of First Nations and Peoples in Australia
0427 292 492 ghillar29@gmail.com
http://www.sovereignunion.mobi (or nationalunitygovernment.org)

To those who have contacted me asking for the full article by gary foley re noel pearson, all i can say is that i’m attempting to do so.

fkj
Ray Jackson
President

Indigenous Social Justice Association
isja01@internode.on.net

(m) 0450 651 063
(p) 02 9318 0947
address 1303/200 pitt street waterloo 2017
http://www.isja.org.au

we live and work on the stolen lands of the gadigal people.

sovereignty treaty social justice

An interview with Fred Hooper on Brisban’es 4ZZZ’s ‘Anarchy Show’

http://audioboo.fm/boos/1414792-audio-fred-hooper-murrawarri-republic-4zzz

Nelson Mandela’s Communist Links Exposed

English: Nelson Mandela in Johannesburg, Gaute...

English: Nelson Mandela in Johannesburg, Gauteng, on 13 May 1998 (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Article Mirrored.

Despite decades of Nelson Mandela denying that he was an official member of the South African Communist Party (SACP) during his Soviet-backed war on the Apartheid government, evidence uncovered recently by British historian Stephen Ellis shows otherwise. The new research confirmed that not only was the African National Congress (ANC) leader a member of the SACP, he may have actually been a senior official working with the party’s Central Committee.

Still, for 50 years, while admitting that he was influenced by Marx and other communist luminaries, Mandela has denied — in public, at least — that he was an actual member of the Communist Party. But now, documents discovered at the University of Cape Town by Stephen Ellis, a professor based at the Free University of Amsterdam, completely contradict Mandela’s bogus claims.

Among other evidence, Ellis found minutes from a secret SACP meeting of top leaders in 1982. The papers document a high-level Communist Party functionary’s discussion about Mandela having joined the SACP around 20 years earlier. That would mean he joined in the beginning of the 1960s, probably 1961 or 1962, well before he was prosecuted for, among numerous other crimes, membership in the outlaw party backed by some of the most ruthless tyrants on the face of the Earth.

Article Mirrored from New American.  Read more here.