In a Civilized Society, when is a Job not a Job?

Never, ever, think outside the box

Never, ever, think outside the box (Photo credit: Mrs eNil)

When is a Job not a job, but something else?  When we talk about a civilised society, how do we measure the percentage of the actual civility compared to the ideal of great civilisations that become significant turning points in history?  

Take Greece for instance, it was known for its great art and the development of democracy, which originates from the Greek words “demos” (of and by the people) and. “kratos” (to rule).

Subsequently the people entrust their Sovereignty (All Rights Claimed or All Rights Reserved) and together the people form a constitution which indicates how they will run their society.  If the society does it well, and everyone agrees with certain self-evident principles like everyone has the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness or in more widened terms, the right to life and health, the right to self-help, the right to self-defence, right to a fair trial (as determined by a jury justice system of one’s peers), and the right to appeal (to a Grande Jury of one’s peers).

The glue that holds any civilised society together as a cohesive unit is the courts where citizens can go peacefully to settle disputes or punish crimes.  The power to punish is the ultimate authority and that is the beginning and the end of anything that could resemble a job.

A job is something that is not a judicial act – that means a job is not something that harms people (negligence and torts aside).

A job was developed by the current illegal money changers (the only time Jesus became violent was when he attacked the money changers), with the word “job” an acronym for Just Over Broke.  An honest days work is done by street sweepers, plumbers, and builders, among other occupations.

However, when a person commits a judicial act, they either act in the position of ultimate authority as they are entrusted to make law for the good of the people, or they are in the position of carrying out the laws, and this includes occupations such as the defence forces, the police, the judiciary, State and Federal Ministers, the administrators of the laws (council workers, secretaries, security personnel etc) and the individual journalists who report scandal and crime.

The Nuremberg trials, as corrupt as they were, established that the defense of “I was just doing my job” is no defense at all.  Ethics, Morals and Responsibility towards the civilized society that person inhabits is the ultimate test as to whether that person is prepared to become a whore for the establishment for money.  People who do have high standards of ethics and morality will either just quit the job, or become whistleblowers against the establishment.

If there is no provision in a country’s Constitution, either at the beginning of its formation, or by changes brought about, to bring charges of treason and sedition against those who hold positions of power and corrupt that power to their own ends, then corruption and fraud escalates to the current level in the world where the money changers are again in charge of the world by controlling the money, they can override our Constitution and control how that society spends its money.  The whores, I mean administrators who help carry out bad laws and corrupt actions commit a judicial act.

For instance, a secretary to a Government department might argue that they only typed the letter, however the secretary is under the mistaken impression she has a job.  The act is not a job, it enables, and the secretary is an enabler.

An enabler can never have just a job, because they commit a judicial act that enables the law to be exercised.  Actions only happen when people make them happen.  If the law harms the people, and everyone under the law doesn’t sit down and think and reflect on that law, and then carries out that law regardless of its consequences is guilty of an accessory-after-the-fact and/or sedition.  Treason is a more serious charge and is reserved for such politicians as Julia Gillard who was charged with treason by Brian Shaw in Elijah’s Challenge, which of course the establishment chose to ignore.

The illegality of the status quo is maintained when investigative journalists are banned by the big mainstream press outlets from telling us the truth.  In some cases the establishment will kill in order to squash a story, like the death of the journalist by the name of Michael Hastings, briefly featured in the biased movie about Julian Assange called “The Fifth Estate“.  His death is widely considered to be a political murder as he reportly told friends he was about to break a big story to do with the cia and thought he was being followed.  Witnesses reported hearing/seeing an explosion before his car hit a tree.

When a journalist says to Alex Jones of Infowars off record that he’s been told by his boss to go after them by falsely reporting that demonstrators attacked police at the JFK memorial ceremony just one week ago, when in actual fact the live footage taken by Infowars clearly shows the police attacked the demonstrators.  The establishment do not want discussion about the death of JFK, and certainly don’t want to show on mainstream media these demonstrations because we know and they know they have ignored the evidence.

This journalist does not have a job because he/she commits a judicial act every time he/she reports.  If that journalist is not comfortable being an enabler of propaganda that journalist should at the very least say no and quit, or become a whistleblower.

The answer to oppression and tyranny is for each person to take note that they are responsible for their actions, and that the many will hold the few to account when we are able to restore a jury justice system.  This is why the jury justice system is despised by lawyers and those in power, because juries will hold them accountable for any harm done to others.

The musketeers chanted “all for one, and one for all”.  When a civilised people stick together they create common law based on the self-evident principles of a Constitution.   A civilised society must stand united, or divided fall.  This is the measure of a civilised society, and is the summation of what a job is, and what a job is not.

Advertisements

Joe Hockey’s Austerity Plan for Australia

English: Joe Hockey at the official opening of...

Thanks to the Citizens Electoral Council (CEC) for exposing the substance of Joe Hockey’s speech to the London Institute of Economic Affairs.   The CEC states that “Treasurer Joe Hockey in an April 2012 speech in London demanded democracy must not obstruct deep cuts to government spending on health, education, and other essential services, revealing himself to be in lock-step with those who are orchestrating a revival of 1930s-style fascism to manage the present global financial crisis”.

The LNP Abbott led Jesuit style government is not only stepping back from promises made before the election like the Gonski Funding for education, they are actively orchestrating the demise of democracy in Australia.  The Labor Government is run by the same bankers, so to expect anything different from them is pure fantasy.

The two party system in Australia, like America, gives the public an illusion of choice.  An illustration of fascism is the failure for courts to provide a jury in the recent court case where Simon Gittany was charged with murder.  This a travesty of justice, and demonstrates the illegality of the status quo, and Australia’s march towards fascism.

Regardless of guilt or innocence, when someone is charged with murder there must be a jury, as a jury is the only way to guarantee any resemblence of a fair trial.  A one judge star chamber cannot be trusted, since single judges often overlook or ignore evidence in civil cases, so how can a single judge be trusted to give a man charged with murder a fair trial?

To read the full Citizens Electoral Council Article click here.

Jesuit Trained Pope is a Communist

Pope Francis met with media

Excerpts of an Article by Kurt Nimmo on Infowars.com (November 26, 2013)

Pope Francis released his first encyclical on Tuesday. In addition to restating opposition by the Catholic Church to abortion, the new Pope criticized free market capitalism and advocated wealth redistribution.

As a tutored Jesuit and Argentine, Pope Francis is a student of the Jesuit Reductions, the Catholic program of the 17th and 18th centuries to Christianize, tax and govern the people of Spain, Argentina, Brazil, Bolivia and America. In Paraguay under the Jesuits, according to the New Advent Catholic Encyclopedia, the “economic basis was a sort of communism” ruled over by the caciques, or tribal leaders, at the behest and guidance of the Padres.

“The Jesuits aimed to set up [in Paraguay] a completely communistic system, in the sense that no individual rights were recognized and there was no private property,” writes John Findlater in The Revolutionary Movement: A Diagnosis of World Disorders. “Everything belonged to the State, and was supposed to be shared in common. But in reality much the greater part of the proceeds of good sold was always remitted to the Camarilla [advisers to the Spanish kings]; and the Guaranis [Indians of Paraguay, northern Argentina, and southern Brazil] got only the bare necessities of life in return for their toil and sweat.”

Click here to read the full article.

 

 

 

 

 

Communism Campbell Newman’s wet dream

Can Do?

Can Do? (Photo credit: dale.n)

Thank you for the Brisbane Times Article titled “Campbell Newman taking lessons from Vladimir Putin“, Peter Callaghan Sc (president of the Law and Justice Institute (Qld) Inc).  Your article was well written and it is agreed that the Government are quickly becoming despised by its citizens, however Mr Callaghan appears to be of the mistaken opinion that Russia is a democracy.  Although it appears on the surface this is the case, it is common knowledge amongst truth-seekers (the establishment refer to as conspiracy theorists) that communism went underground in Russia.  If Russia or North Korea does not have a Jury Justice system, then like Queensland, it does not have truth and justice either.

Callaghan says that “What makes our democracy different is respect for conventions like judicial independence, engagement with the parliamentary process, and adherence to the rule of law” which I challenge on the following basis:

1.  Like Russia, Queensland has democracy in name only.

2,  Judicial independence means that judges are free to nullify bad laws, therefore are independent of government.  Independance can only be achieved under a jury justice system as any single judge is open to threat or bribes.  QUT (Queensland University of Technology) Law School teaches that judges don’t have the power to nullify bad laws.  Only randomly chosen jurors are independent, and only jury nullification has the power to nullify bad law.  One Judge Star Chambers starkly demonstrate that there is no judicial independence here in Queensland.

3,  There is no engagement in the parilamentary process.  Last time Queensland had a Referendum in 1917 the people rejected the Upper House being removed, but it was illegally removed anyway in 1922, and any engagement that does not toe the party line is quickly demonised and dealt with.  It’s pure fantasy to believe a unicameral government system in Queensland is democratic.

4.  Adherence to the Rule of Law (see Point 2).  What is lawful and what is legal are two entirely different things.

Rightly said Mr Callaghan that “it cloaks daggers aimed at the heart of the rule of law”, because what have here in Queensland is a New World City – headquarters of the New World Order, a fascist communist dictatorship which has been in the making for approximately 150 years.  This plot ties in the assassinations of John F Kennedy and Harold Holt, and a number of other people.

The Nazi’s never lost WWII.  Welcome to the Fourth Reich.

 

Queensland Government: An Illegal One Party Dictatorship

English: Tony Fitzgerald, Corruption Commissioner

English: Tony Fitzgerald, Corruption Commissioner (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Thank you Brisbane Times for publishing unedited the article by Tony Fitzgerald called “Power and the Inconvenience of Truth” and the article titled “Queensland Needs An Upper House” where the only two independent MP’s elected, Liz Cunningham (Member for Gladstone) and Independent member for Nicklin Peter Wellington called for the restoration of Queensland’s Upper House after they were sacked from the  Parliamentary Crime and Misconduct Committee.  Attorney-General Jarrod Bleijie prefers Crime and Misconduct acting Chair Ken Levy, a proven liar who will toe the party line.

While Tony Fitzgerald’s article was measured it still hit the mark, but let’s not mince words here, a unicameral government is a dictatorship.  It is a fact that in 1917 there was a Referendum to abolish the Upper House in Queensland which failed, yet in 1922 the Upper House was illegally removed.   QUT (Queensland University of Technology) Law School in 2012 could not and would not provide an answer on how Queensland’s Upper House was removed legally.  The lawyers/teachers should know if it was legal or not, and if they cover up the illegality, they are also an accessory-after-the-fact, and are guilty of sedition.

This is the illegality of the status quo, and the accepted illegality of the removal of the Upper House by every single sitting member of the Queensland parliament are continuing to commit a criminal offence, so that any member who sits (all of the LNP party) and does not demand a return to the original constitution of Queensland has committed sedition, the punishment of which used to call for a lynching in the town square.

However bringing back the Upper House is only part of the problem/solution.  Any discussion on Truth and Justice must address the courts modus operandi  There is absolutely no justice at all in Queensland when the courts operate in secret (family courts) and courts are serviced by one judge Star Chamber, who is often either biased, incompetent or on the take, particularly so if that judge is a freemason, or a member of some other illegal secret society (gang).

The V.L.A.D. the impaler laws (Vicious Lawless Associate Disestablishment Bill) should be applied across the defence force, the police, the judiciary and the parliament to remove and jail those who are gang members of secret societies such as Freemasons, Order of the Red Garter (Anna Bligh), Knights of Malta, Fabian Socialists (Kevin Rudd); and Jesuit Brotherhood (Quentin Bryce).  This would do a lot to clean up the system.

There have been so many blatant miscarriages of justice here in Queensland, it would take decades to right.  One of the problems is the controlled media who through influence and deep pockets can take out a political party such as One Nation and its individual politicians like Pauline Hansen.  Scott Balson was targeted for exposing the real news on the One Nation website such as the fact that Queensland had a known paedophile Bill D’Arcy still able to enact laws for Queensland while awaiting trial.  Watch Scott Balson’s story “Enemy of the State” on the state of Justice in Queensland on You Tube here (Part 1); (Part 2); (Part 3) and (Part 4).

Without unobstructed juries sitting in every court, both civil and criminal, there can be no justice.  The truth is that common law is trial by jury, and there are many excellent articles on the Democracy Defined Website that explain the term legem terrae and the power of the jury justice system, particularly the power of jury nullification.

In the United States of America a man by the name of James Baab is interviewed on WHDT9 by Gary Franchi titled “REPORT: Jury Rights Billboard Campaign Infuriates Prosecutors”.  organised enough money to be donated to run a series of billboard advertisements near the courts to tell juries of their right to jury nullification, as courts will often tell juries that they only have the power to judge the facts.  This is a lie, because the jury has the power to judge the law and the facts.  If the law is a stupid law that is not in the interests of the people, the law will be disposed of and a jury justice system would certainly void any legislation that was not in the public interest, and therefore would discourage the enactment of such legislation.

A jury justice system would also hold all public servants to account, with the power to bring charges of treason and sedition returned to the courts.  If powerful public servants are forced to act in their jobs under their own personal liability, and their own homes, vehicles and freedom was threatened, integrity would begin to return to the Queensland Government overnight.

JFK Assassination – 50 Year Anniversary: The Truth Will Out

This is an article written by Kenn d’Oudney of www.democracydefined.org
T
his article is covered in full for public educational purposes and for the public restoration of the Jury Justice System.

Frame 150 from the Zapruder Film

Frame 150 from the Zapruder Film (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Dear Members,
Greetings. We hope you are well.

JFK.
“The truth will out.”

Et tu, Brute,”* quoth Julius Cæsar to his associate Senator Brutus, as the last of the high-placed conspirators plunged a dagger into his torn body. One might well have said that to LBJ

*”And you too, Brutus?”

The 1963 coup d’état signals the ultimate overt takeover of Western government. The 22nd of November is the day the banks’ owners’ 1913 conspiracy came of age. Those who are aware of and unafraid to confront the evidence understand and do what they can to resist the treachery of modern politicians and judiciary. Subsequently, all our ‘politicians’ and ‘judges’ toe-the-line without hesitation or they are replaced.

All societies govern through their Justice System. The power to punish carries with it all power. Restoration re-establishes the Absolute Sovereignty of the People through their Courts of Justice backed by the police, prison service and Armed Services. That is why we advocate a mass educational campaign to emplace RESTORATION; the Constitutional Common Law Trial by Jury being the only peaceful way known to humankind by which to hold wayward government to the will of the people.

The owned-and-controlled mainstream media show no inclination to publish the execrable truth as to how all the beneficent aspects of Western Civilisation are being destroyed to allow an utterly sanguivolent* clandestine world dictatorship to arise. The duty falls to ‘ordinary’ men and women, We the People, to take responsible actions to re-assert the just authority of the people over harmful misgovernment. This would include the forwarding of these selected serious videos and texts which expose the cover-up.

*Definition. sanguivolent, bloodthirsty.

Further to the videos recently circulated to you, here are others which need to be taken seriously. Understanding how the Zapruder film was re-made into a composite before its showing to the Warren Commission, and eventually the public, is helpful. To conceal the slowing and stopping of the car in the kill zone, by removal of tell-tale frames whilst the film was in possession of the FBI, contributes to establishing cover-up.

JFK’s Revenge part 1 – The Zapruder Film Was Altered
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Am4qdl9PTA

The Muchmore Film Suggests Frames Were Removed from the Zapruder Film
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hrX8lsb2WTk

Please note that attorney Mark Lane’s first class, moving video, Two Men in Dallas has five parts.  Here is a recapitulation of various videos:

Is Fecit Cui Profuit:
He did the deed who profited by it.

Consider the imminent reduction of the oil depletion allowance (billions); the planned withdrawal of the military from Vietnam; the treasury (not Federal Reserve) printing of billions of interest-free cash for issue in 1964 (subsequently burned at LBJ’s order); the progressive takeover from the private banks and Fed of the issuance of credit (interest-free) and national currency (à la Lincoln and the ‘greenbacks’); the dissolution of the CIA; the advocated rapprochement with the USSR; consequent massive reduction of armaments and military expenditures; the investigation of LBJ for large-scale graft and possible involvement in Texas homicides by Attorney General Bobby Kennedy’s department… just for starters…

In case you have not yet seen them, I have listed for you some videos indispensable to the acquisition of an objective overview.

We have great respect for attorney Mark Lane’s painstaking, courageous expositions. He interviewed people whose eye-witness and other crucial testimony was excluded by the FBI (Hoover) from presentation to the Warren Commission.

Not that the commission was slow to invent false schemes of its own; viz. Gerald Ford ‘moved’ the middle-right back-wound ‘up’ to allow the small frontal throat-entry-wound to ‘become’ an ‘exit’ wound to explain away a shot he claimed to have been from behind and above (despite Parkland doctors’ designating it a small circular entry aperture “about the width of the end of a little finger”).

After the cadaver had left Parkland, the front throat wound was subsequently photographed much enlarged, presumably from a discreet, unadmitted intervention to locate, extract and conceal another bullet lodged internally, and to obscure it as having been another shot from the front (making at least four shots, with James Tague‘s pavement near miss). However, eyewitnesses at the hospital saw that the car had taken two more hits. The president’s brain was also removed at that undisclosed intervention (before the official post mortem; autopsy; see Hankey’s video and TMWKK), as witnessed by the Bethesda hospital porters when it arrived in Washington.

Another fiction was assistant counsel to the commission Arlen Specter’s impossible ‘single bullet theory’ which claimed to have struck first Kennedy from behind and exited his throat at the front, and then passed through the back/chest/rib, right wrist and finally lodged in the left thigh of Connolly, ‘apparently’ falling out onto the hospital trolley to be ‘found’ by a porter.

John Hankey spotted the Hoover-to-George Bush letter of reply and saw its incriminating significance. It was only released from secret FBI files around the turn of this century amongst hundreds of thousands of other pages of documents.

The coup d’état was complete and the instigators are still at it. Old they may be, but some of these military-industrial complex bank-owner-villains are active to this day. Their putrescent progeny are out of the same mould.

Also, LBJ’s mistress admits knowledge to his participation in the conspiracy; well worth a look.

Oswald’s girlfriend in Dallas’s fascinating account gives a rare view of the man.

CIA operative E. Howard Hunt (who participated in the CIA’s illegal but admitted 1954 overthrow of the elected president of Guatemala, Jacobo Arbenz Guzmán; was involved in the planning of the failed Bay of Pigs invasion of Cuba; and was later one of the White House’s Watergate burglars), made a deathbed audio tape confession to his son stating his prior knowledge of the conspiracy, and describing as “maniacal” LBJ’s obsession with becoming president. After Hunt’s death, his sons Howard St. John and David released the tape and notes of their father’s confessions onto the Internet.

1. Rush to Judgement, attorney Mark Lane’s sobering investigation
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LnzpDZDnvNY

2. Two Men in Dallas. Mark Lane’s interview of fated Dallas witness, honest policeman Roger Craig – part one http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QyvRfeLDsB4
part two http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UFEx8hjD8kE
Five essential Parts. Never forget: 1.) The Mauser — no Mannlicher Carcano was present in the TSBDepository; and 2.) The presence of Malcolm ‘Mac’ Wallace’s little-fingerprint in the TSBD sniper’s nest. Wallace was a released but previously convicted murderer of a golf-pro dating LBJ’s sister. The unfortunate man was disapproved of by LBJ.

3. The Men who Killed Kennedy Documentary, Oswald’s girlfriend’s account, part 8 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3rluPItXdPA

4. In addition to part 8, the entire documentary, TMWKK, is recommended.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x2agPurqFJk
Coroner and lifelong forensic scientist Howard Wecht’s professional assessments, and former senior secret service officer Prouty’s explanation about the desertion of duty, stand-down and complicity of secret service personnel present, are compelling. Much else of interest too.

5. JFK II – The Bush Connection Documentary by John Hankey http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HyiAXy8L8-I

6. LBJ’s mistress nails him! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=POmdd6HQsus

7. E.H. Hunt’s deathbed confessions http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bD4611qW6R8

Yours sincerely,
Kenn.

Kenn d’Oudney.
www.democracydefined.org

Better never to vote at all than vote for a person who does not make EQUAL JUSTICE the prime aim of government by RESTORATION and UNIVERSAL ADOPTION of Constitutional Legem Terræ Common Law Trial by Jury.”

Australian Government set to test GMO vaccine against Cholera

GENETICALLY MODIFIED ORGANISM

GENETICALLY MODIFIED ORGANISM (Photo credit: live w mcs)

The Australian Federal Government is about to start testing a GMO (genetically modified) vaccine to supposedly protect us all from ‘cholera’.  The vaccines will contain live bacteria and some configuration of mercury.  So far it’s Queensland, South Australia, Western Australia and Victoria.  

Read the Federal Government documents on their website.

The Government has also determined that you have consented to organ donation, so Australia is on the march of turning into a communist nation, and instead of denouncing China’s Transplant surgeons and mobile death vans where they harvest organs from live people, they allow the Chinese to build a tunnel from their embassy in Canberra to Parliament House.

Thousands of people need to fire up their Law Administration Process as soon as possible to hold the bastards responsible – let them know in no uncertain terms that you do not consent and you will hold them strictly liable for any harmful health effects, and that you refuse to be forcibly medicated.  Please tell everyone you know our Government is out of control and lets do something about this peaceably through the law (what’s left of it).