In the Matter of The People v. Bergoglio et al (Case Docket No. 18072014-002)

This excerpt is taken from the Judgement in the Matter of The People v Bergoglio et al concerning child trafficking and murder.

Judgement of the Magistrates of the Court,

including the majority decision with with one dissenting opinion

Issued in Chambers Friday, 18 July, 2014

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M5dkEj4_45E&feature=youtu.be

The unanimous Judgement of the Court is that the three primary defendants Jorge BERGOGLIO [Pope Francis], Adolfo PACHON [Jesuit Superior General] and Justin WELBY [Archbishop of Canterbury] have been convicted and are guilty as charged of aiding and abetting Crimes against Humanity, including murder and human trafficking, and of personal involvement in those crimes. Their guilt has been ably presented and proven beyond any reasonable doubt by the Prosecution.

The refusal of the Defendants to respond to a lawful Summons, to deny or refute the charges against them, or to present a counter case in their own defense, compelled the Court to consider their silence as a de facto pro confesso plea in which their guilt was established by their refusal to enter a plea. Precedent has established that pro confesso – which is the refusal of a defendant to plea in a case of profound importance – provides the basis for the lawful conviction and deposing of rulers and responsible heads of church and state. (The People in Parliament v. Charles Stuart, January 3, 1649)

In this precedent, the High Court established by the Parliament of England ruled that the silence of heads of church and state when accused of crimes against their own people amounts to a confession by the accused of all of the charges made against them (January 22, 1649).

One of our colleagues offers a dissenting opinion.

While concurring with the judgement that all three Defendants are guilty as charged, the dissenting Magistrate argues that pro confesso applies only when no other means exist to prevent such rulers from perpetrating tyranny and wars of aggression on their own people and their liberties, as was so in the historical case cited.

To read more, particularly the background to this case, here’s the link: http://exopolitics.blogs.com/exopolitics/2014/10/satanic-jesuit-pope-francis-bergoglios-statement-on-et-role-in-universe-creation-is-1-scientifically-correct-and-intended.html

Advertisements