United Nations Historical Announcement at Global Citizen Festival

The Global Citizen Concert on Saturday 26th September finally aired tonight in Australia, Wednesday 30th September 2015.  The concert was aired up to four (4) days later in various countries around the world, two (2) days either side of the blood moon (2+2=4).  The satanic overtones were expressed in numbers and symbols throughout the Festival.  The final tetrad (fourth 4th) Blood Moon was on Monday 28th September 2015 and appears as a warning, part of the biblical prophecy of the Christian faith.

The Global Goals for Sustainability were actually code for the announcement that the United Nations is seizing control, and all nations will be subsumed into its belly.  All sovereignty will be abolished and the UN will start dictating laws to governments who will be public figureheads only.  This is the covert announcement of global governance which is politically correct language for the announcement of the New World Order (NWO).

There were seventeen (1+7=8) goals, and all the goals had their own distinct symbol.  The symbol most used throughout the Festival was the thirteenth (1+3=4) goal of Climate Action, being the eye of Horus.

ISIS is the Egyptian symbol associated with the eye of Horus.  ISIS we are told by Leo Zagami plan to announce the Antichrist after mid November 2015, and want a nuclear tsunami to kill the Infidels so they can bring in a worldwide caliphate which is just another word for dictatorship, tyranny and fascism.

The symbology throughout the Festival emphasised the eye of Horus, it was big and red and the colour red which symbolises blood, passion and anger was the predominant presentation along with gay couples kissing and fondling each other.  The Festival Ceremony emphasised lyrics such as “how long shall we kill the prophets” and “I feel myself”, “I am so awesome” and “she dreams in red”.  “There is a deeper world than this” tells us that demons inhabit a deeper world we cannot see, and this sentence also tells us that what goes on behind the scenes is different from what we are told or led to believe.

The music emphasised sex and the body and feminism, yet contrary to its Fifth Goal of Gender Equality (the Rights of Women and Children) the five young women standing on stage were all Muslim and wore head coverings.  These women have absolutely no freedom nor equality, yet they were used to preach to the decadent Christians.

The white cross was used alongside gay couples, and the goals bore damn lies and statistics with the numbers 13 and 29 prophetic numbers as worn by Beyonce.  With everyone wearing their black and white Global Citizens t-shirts, the colours black and white symbolise the intermixing of the races.

At first glance the United Nations goals sound lofty and many people will be sucked into believing them, but in actual fact they intend to do the opposite of all these goals.  The conspiracy theorists have been partially vindicated..  They will begin to push RFID chips for a global digital currency, to bring in more and more laws and to end our rights and freedoms.  The apocalypse is upon us.

Advertisements

TURNBULL WAS A LABOR COUP D’ETAT

The recent overthrow of Tony Abbott by Malcolm Turnbull was a coup d’etat for Labor, since Malcolm Turnbull supports Labor policies, particularly the climate change policies of Labor.  Lord Monckton predicted that Tony Abbott would need to watch his back, because the Cabal want Australia to vote yes in the Paris Climate Change conference coming up in Paris in December 2015.

This Climate Change Treaty, endorsed by the Vatican, will enforce Agenda 30 upon Australians, mandating a reduction in carbon emissions by about 26% whereas previously Australia’s target was only 5%.  It will also cement global governance, or a global government.  George Bush’s New World Order.

Australians were up in arms over Labor’s imposition of the ridiculous carbon tax, however we haven’t seen anything yet.  What will befall our country if Turnbull, the new Prime Minister, agrees to sign the treaty will be shocking to every Australian.  The aim of the tax is to keep the Australian people poor and destroy small business, all in the name of creating jobs of course.  While there might be a few new jobs, the jobs lost will far outweigh any new jobs created.

While our manufacturing and business sector is crushed, China will be allowed to keep expanding until about 2030.

Consequently, while Australia has had five Prime Ministers in five years, this current coup was to oust a legitimately elected liberal government who opposed the carbon tax, in exchange for a Prime Minister who really should have joined the Labor party.

To read more about Malcolm Turnbull’s history as a Labor sympathiser, and read about his association with corrupt former NSW Premier Neville Wran, disgraced former High Court Judge Lionel Murphy, and communist sympathiser former High Court Judge Michael Kirby, go to http://stopturnbull.com/

Remember, birds of a feather flock together.

QLD LABOR RAMPS UP LNP FASCIST LAWS PROVING A ONE PARTY STATE

Queensland Labor Attorney General Yvette D’Ath is proving herself to be just as unpopular with Queenslanders as Campbell Newman.  According to the Friday’s edition of the Courier Mail on 19 June 2015, “Drinkers face Random Bar Booze testing from Police”.

This cultural shift will disrupt the good old Aussie tradition of buying your mates a beer at the local bar if the police Gestapo are allowed to turn up at essentially private outings by Queenslanders, without a warrant, and demand that you blow in the bag in order to build a case for the government prosecution for the pre-crime of violence.

What about the consent of the governed?  What happens to those people who refuse to blow in the bag?  Will the government charge them with being violent in a public place, like they charge drivers for being drunk behind the wheel if they refuse to submit to a breath test?  .

Or perhaps the Labor government will charge non-violent dissenters with being drunk and disorderly?  Will they hand dissenters fines, or will the police get violent towards the non-violent dissenters, handcuff them and throw them in the watchhouse for being drunk, violent and disorderly because they refuse to submit?  Will dissenters lose their right to go out and become banned from nightclub precincts altogether if they don’t submit?  Will continual dissent see normal law-abiding citizens end up in jail for pre-crime offences?

Will licensed pubs, clubs and restaurants be placed under economic duress by becoming unwitting targets in the further fascist crackdown to control the movement and actions of otherwise law-abiding citizens?

When will the young people wake up from their slumber?  Everyone in Queensland particularly young people need to learn Jurisdictionary® so they can protect and enforce their rights in a court of law without spending a large amount of money on expensive lawyers.

 

RICK WILLIAMS MP FAILED LEGAL ARGUMENT

Rick Williams, MP endorsed by Labor in the State Seat of Pumicestone, is a Defendant in the case against Unitywater and Moreton Bay Regional Council, is also a Justice of the Peace Qualified (Queensland) and a Certified Financial Planner.

The Courier Mail article on Wednesday 17th June 2015 attempted to sensationalize the story by calling his claim “bizarre”  to make it look as though Rick Williams was insane for mentioning the Constitution, Contract Law and The Torrens Title system that backed up the notion that his land is his own.  Not only that, but the Rupert Murdoch owned paper, the lap-dog of the political party system, said that the case raised “… serious questions about Labor’s pre-selection and vetting process”.

Labor cannot be seen to have a thinking man who appears to be part of the current Worldwide Revolution in Nationalism and Liberty in its ranks of boot-lickers, as all members of Labor are expected, nay required, to tow the party line, which is Fabian Socialist in nature.

The arguments against Unitywater and Moreton Bay Regional Council are on the right track, but are not completely correct, and in law, if there is a mistake or misnomer in one sentence, then the whole sentence is struck out.  Rick Williams is correct in his assertion that there is “…no enforceable WET INK contract of agreement” with Unitywater. Unitywater has a monopoly on its supply of water, where is the consumer choice here?

Unfortunately water is something that we cannot live without, and for that reason Unitywater operate an extortion racket, to make people pay for water which is an inalienable inherent right.  He is correct to state that Unitywater was placing him under economic duress.  Pay up or die for lack of water.  If Unitywater cut off his supply of water, would this not amount to attempted murder?

It all comes down to whether or not you know who you are, a fiction (corpse-oration:  dead man speaking: your birth certificate registration number) or are you a spirit inhabiting a body?  If you are an atheist and say you are just flesh and blood, then even cadavers are flesh and blood which puts you back to the status of corporation, for even the dead have estates.  This follows the old Bablyonnian law that declared all the slaves as being dead in the eyes of the law, but the remedy was in the Live Birth Certificate.   Learn how to attain legal remedy by learning how to conduct your own lawsuit using Jurisdictionary®

Rick Williams major fault with his argument, was using the Commonwealth Constitution and the Torrens Title system.  Unfortunately the Commonwealth Constitution is no longer valid or in operation because all the world became insolvent in 1933.  Can a company declared insolvent still operate?  Yes, if it is placed under Administration, the company Constitution becomes invalid and the Administrators control the functions of the company. This is what has happened to Australia.  We became insolvent in 1933, like so many other countries, and our Constitution largely became invalid from that date.  We are now run by the shadowy Central Bankers and IMF.

Although Councils do not technically have the right to tax, with the Constitution in mothballs, they can and do disguise the land tax as rates.  Their rate notices are purposely not broken down into its relevant subsections such as garbage collection, otherwise people would realise they are being forced to pay a tax to the owner of the land, which is the Crown, which is owned by the Private Central Bankers.

If people are forced to pay a tax on the land, then the owner of the land, the Council, representing the Private Banking Fraternity, can repossess the land.  If that is the case, then mortgages and legal title become just ink and paper.

As for the Torrens Title system of registration, just ask any farmer whether or not their land belongs to them, and you’ll be presented with a tonne of legislation that virtually eliminates all rights to land ownership in Queensland, indeed Australia, giving more rights to the land to those who seek to exploit it, being the big corporations and the government itself, than to the landowner.

The key is the word “registration”, particularly the prefix “regis” which means the King, the “Crown”.  Once anything is registered to the Crown, the Crown becomes the legal owner of the thing and you then pay to use that which you have surrendered; ownership is vested in the Crown.

The legal system, hence the economic system of Central Bank oligopoly is supported by stupid barristers and lawyers.  Having said that, all in the profession of law are not bad people. some such as Dr Graves from Jurisdictionary® have the peoples best interests at heart because they want you to learn how the system works so you can learn how to protect your rights, without having to use expensive and often out-of-reach lawyers.

Remember lawyers are bound to worship the court, and some do so in more ways than one, especially if they are part of the freemasonic clique.  The law schools state on one hand that uncertain clauses in contracts are illegal, yet mortgages with variable interest rates, with no upper limit, are allowed to stand as lawful.  How can this be so?

Rick Williams MP should quit the labor party and stand as an Independent, and cement himself as representing the people and not the corporations, which is the Labor and Liberal fascist Fabian Socialist agenda.

Truth Exposes Cancer Council’s Biggest Morning Tea: Fraud, MisRepresentation and Negligence

6 June 2015

Recently the Cancer Council held its Biggest Morning Tea at various private and public locations throughout Australia.  At these morning teas the Cancer Council begged for donations for research, prevention and support, and states on its website it has raised over three and a half million dollars thus far.

Splashed on papers everywhere were people enjoying a coffee (most likely sweetened with sugar or aspartame) and donuts which are made up of refined white flour cooked in artery clogging hydrolysed vegetable oils such as Canola which contains genetically modified organisms (GMO’s), a type of frankenfood, after the scary monster Frankenstein, made up of different parts of people all sewn together.  On that note, if science says it is two years away from head transplants, why can’t they cure cancer?

That answer is revealed when you study history.  Cancer Council Australia commenced in 1961 as the Australian Cancer Society, then the six state Cancer Councils agreed to establish a federal body to promote cancer control at the national level.  The rate of cancer in Australia has more than doubled, it is out of control, under the auspices of the Cancer Council their website states that now one in two Australians will get cancer.

For any “thinking person will at this point start scratching their head, because there is something wrong with this picture.

On the Cancer Council website it tries to hammer the alternative health movement of holistic medicine (indigenous, sacred, whole, energetic) which regards food as both medicine and poison.  This belief system was the predominant medical training in America before Carnegie and Rockefeller got their hands on the medical education system, effectively banishing holistic medicine to the sidelines in favour of the chemical industry.  Mainstream doctors are taught a few things about nutrition, in so far as the standard knowledge that cancer patients should avoid sugar.  Yet, in the test to detect cancer patients are injected with sugar.

The Cancer Council are negligent and are misrepresenting the facts in regards to the causes of cancer by tearing down those that prefer to eat good food. For instance their website “The Biggest Morning Tea” states:

  • ‘Clean’, ‘raw’, ‘natural’ and ‘paleo’ ingredients: The increasing interest in so-called ‘clean’ eating, ‘raw’ food, and paleo diets has resulted in the creation of ‘healthier’ treat alternatives and the use of ingredients such as rice malt and agave syrups, xylitol, coconut flour and oils, cacao powder, and sea salt flakes. Cancer Council does not endorse these diets, recipes and ingredients to be healthier alternatives as they still contribute to kilojoule, saturated fat, sugar and sodium intake. Recipes using these ingredients may not necessarily be considered healthier recipes, and should be balanced with indulgent recipes that contain more accessible baking ingredients such as sugar, butter and plain flour.  (Emphasis mine)

Here the Cancer Council are telling you to eat sugar and plain flour, and are misrepresenting saturated fats, as their explanation is far too simplistic and treats all saturated fats as equal which they are not.  Given that sugar is a known favourite food of cancer cells and plain flour is the cause of gluten intolerance, therefore inflammation and immune disorders caused by leaky gut syndrome, why are they telling you to eat it?

If the Cancer Council won’t address the cause of why one in two Australians get cancer, how can they prevent it, or cure it?  Isn’t it logical that in order to find the cure for cancer, you first have to find the cause of cancer?  If cancer is not something you “catch” then it must be associated with what we put in our mouths and what is absorbed by the skin?

The Cancer Council talks about excessive kilojoule intake, which again is far too simplistic, however they fail to address a far more important count of exposure to chemicals, insecticides and GMOs.

Naturalnews.com reports that sunscreen, which is heavily promoted by the Cancer Council, contains nano particles which are more easily absorbed by the skin and contains ingredients which are carcinogenic.  Not only that, but not getting enough sun blocks Vitamin D production by blocking UVB rays and Sunscreen also blocks a pigment called melanin.  Vitamin D has proven anti-cancer properties.  Why is the Cancer Council ignoring these carcinogenic properties contained in the use of sunscreens?

Could the Cancer Council’s agenda be to secretly promote more cancer through mis-representation, brainwashing and outright negligence, rather than lessening cancer rates?  The statistics since 1961 certainly seem to indicate that this is the case.

If we looked closely at the Cancer Council Board of Directors and associates you will most likely be sure to find conflicts of interest and bias as there is sure to be links to pharmaceutical companies, agricultural companies and chemical companies, after all the Cancer Council push chemotherapy drugs, ignoring the fact that chemotherapy was developed from Mustard Gas at Yale University, which is famous for the secretive Yale undergraduate secret society called Skull and Bones.

Further comments welcome.

Electoral Report fails to address some big Issues: Australian Democracy is an Illusion

Article by Lex Stewart
President, Australians for Honest Elections Inc.
www.afhe.org.au
With comments by R.L.F.

 ·       Does Government have the competence to fix the voting systems?
 ·       The Joint Standing Committee on Electoral Matters (JSCEM) has failed
 ·       “Vote Early, Vote Often” frauds can continue, unaffected by this report

The report of the JSCEM released on 15 April touched on some longstanding faults in our electoral system, while tackling few of the major issues that need fixing.

“There are some long-running sores that seem to have been avoided by the Joint Committee in its 216-page report, after conducting 21 public hearings and receiving 216 written submissions, including four from this organisation, Australians for Honest Elections”, said AFHE President Lex Stewart.

Our website http://www.afhe.org.au/our-recommendations.html  lists in approximate priority order 9 major recommendations to overcome deficiencies in our electoral systems.  The JSCEM report has addressed only items 3 and 8 out of our 9.

AFHE President Lex Stewart says, “While we commend the JSCEM in making its recommendation 17 for identity before a person is allowed to vote in person (like the Queensland ID introduced a year ago, which the current ALP government is about to remove), the JSCEM has avoided addressing major issues” such as:-

  • the need to require identity before being put onto the Electoral Roll, i.e. the need to delete Commonwealth Electoral Act Sec 98AA (2) (c) which has been used to create thousands of false enrolments (as were used in the recent NSW State election);
  • the lack of proper ID for postal voting (this major source of rorting was used recently in Queensland inter alia to rob Pauline Hanson of a seat by a tiny margin);

(Postal voting has long been recognised as fertile ground for cheating, therefore many countries do not allow it.  UK Election Commissioner Richard Mawrey QC, who has sent people to jail from both sides of politics, horrified during his visit to Australia 4 years ago, said that ‘postal voting is a recipe for fraud … the system is highly vulnerable at a number of critical  points’;  yet his concerns have been ignored by JSCEM)

  • the need to restore Subdivisional voting – to tackle the multiple voting admitted by the AEC as having been 18,770 in the September 2013 election, yet no prosecutions were done! Nor will any be possible if the JSCEM report recommendations are used!
  • the lack of integrity in the Electoral Roll. Pages 75 to 83 of the report can only be described as ‘pathetic’, when one considers what the Australian National Audit Office reports of 2002, 2004 and 2010 said, things which were largely ignored by the AEC.

“AFHE has pointed out many issues to media and JSCEM over the last 19 months, yet they have ignored most of our concerns, based on 22 years of experience,”

“Due to the inadequacies of this JSCEM report coming out over 19 months after the 2013 election, it is plain to all who would be interested in Australia having an honest democracy, that there remain major issues not yet addressed,” said Mr Stewart.

“Whether the Government and Minister Ronaldson are capable of, or interested in, addressing these issues to have honest and fair elections remains to be seen.”

 Comments:  
For those of you new to the subject of democracy, and whether or not it exists in our country, you can see plainly that democracy is an illusion.  However, reclaiming our “democracy” is a waste of time in reality, since it is a system of Mob (majority) rule.  Now this would be fine if the majority had a strong moral code, was capable of using that thing between their ears (the brain = ability to think (analyse; decode reality) and knew the truth about history.

Unfortunately, as the majority of Australians have differing moral codes if any; the ability to think has been stolen by the dumbing down of intellect in the school system, through dangerous additives in vaccinations and poison in our food and water; and fed propaganda and lies as news, this does not behoove a good form of  democracy anyway.

The answer is the original model of the American Constitution, a Republic, where we all have inherent rights granted to us at birth, and we are all armed, with a limited and small government, where the sovereign country retains its rights to control its own money supply.

When government considers us a fiction (see the Birth Certificate/Legal Person); and gives us benefits and privileges but does not recognise our inherent rights (human rights); and when the government is controlled by corporations not the people, then we have a problem.  A BIG PROBLEM.  The stuff that civil wars are fought over, but the civil war of today is an intellectual war, an Information War.

The answer is to regain control of our education system, and control of the courts by restoring the Rule of Law:  Common Law which in reality is unobstructed Juries and Grand Juries with the power of Jury Nullification, founded upon the Magna Carta in 1215, which is 800 years old this year (2015) but has largely been repudiated by various Statutes masquerading as law.

“The people perish for lack of knowledge” (Hosea 4:6 KJB).

You can start your journey today down the rabbithole, and find out why our country is becoming more communistic and fascist year in and year out by reading Carroll Quigley’s book “Tragedy and Hope:  A History of the World in Our Time”.

And that my friends reminds me of a joke:  “What’s 5000 lawyers at the bottom of the ocean?  A:  A good start”.