The countdown is on for the public to get a rare glimpse of the former High Court Judge, Mary Genevieve Gaudron’s life, as she sits in the courtroom as a defendant against her sister Helen Underwood, in an Appeal on a family provision matter, bringing insight into the private family saga that served as the backdrop to a political era that defined the Nation.
The whole sorry state of affairs, which concerns a small estate and an alleged two page Will written by their mother, has generated a judgement in excess of one hundred pages. The Plaintiff, Mary Gaudron’s sister, now known as Helen Underwood changed her name so as to not be identified with her sister, lives off a meager pension and has housing assistance. Helen will be representing herself against not only a former high court judge, but someone who was awarded a University of Sydney Medal for Law for her work in Estate Law.
An interesting fact that identifies why Mary Genevieve Gaudron rose to such high ranks in the law was because she had an eidetic or photographic memory, and this by itself does not mean she has handed down law using any common sense or wisdom, or indeed morals. However, Mary Gaudron’s rise to the esteemed heights of the first woman to sit on the High Court Bench, means that she is considered a veritable “god” by many in the field of law who look up to her and hold her in the highest regard, including the Judges, the Registrars and all the underling Barristers. It is therefore unlikely that her sister, Helen Underwood, will be afforded a fair appeal hearing or judgement unless the public can fill the courtroom with concerned Australians to bear witness and hold the court to account. How can there be a fair trial or appeal when the painted image of the defendant hangs in the court itself? No Judge who hears the matter comes with clean hands and without ingrained bias.
Interestingly the Sydney Morning Herald’s journalist Louise Hall wrote on July 28th 2014 that “… Mary Gaudron was a judge in the highest court in Australia, sitting on landmark cases such as Mabo and Wik … earning a reputation as a passionate advocate for equality and human rights”. However Mary Gaudron’s raw emotional display of hatred for her sister thus far contradicts any supposed display of advocacy for equality and human rights When Mary Gaudron is kept on a high paid judicial pension with fringe benefits, she has shown by her actions she does not have an equitable bone in her body. Mary Gaudron’s actions have shown that she has taken great delight in the fact that her sister cannot afford medical care or a decent pair of shoes. It is indeed unfortunate that the Sydney Morning Herald coldly disregards her sister’s plight of being poor, over the joyous reporting that the former High Court Judge won the initial trial. That the journalist Louise Hall cannot see anything wrong with suffering and inequity is a blight on the moral landscape. Shame, shame, shame.
Perhaps this post might inspire Mary Gaudron to reconsider and settle with her sister thereby avoiding a return to court.
Otherwise you can be assured that after the Appeal, and a judgement has been handed down, that there will be a lengthy article followed up by a expose and a tell-all book that will be a fitting final chapter to Pam Burton’s book about Mary Gaudron, “From Moree to Mabo: The Mary Gaudron Story”
The public is invited to attend the Supreme Court Sydney in the hearing of Helen Underwood and Mary Genevieve Gaudron (former High Court Judge) and her sister, Kathryn Theresa Gaudron on Tuesday 25th August 2015 at 10.15am.
Countdown to the Appeal: 0 days to go.
Publication of this appeal is deliberately being kept from the public in the mainstream media. Infact, “She, who cannot be named” has perhaps through influence and favours, hijacked the last post of this blog which advised the public of the upcoming appeal, with those words suspiciously missing from google searches. This repost attempts to remedy that matter.
UPDATE: The Decision was reserved and is expected to be handed down on the morning of Tuesday 8th September 2015. An in-depth article will be posted soon after the decision.
6 June 2015
Recently the Cancer Council held its Biggest Morning Tea at various private and public locations throughout Australia. At these morning teas the Cancer Council begged for donations for research, prevention and support, and states on its website it has raised over three and a half million dollars thus far.
Splashed on papers everywhere were people enjoying a coffee (most likely sweetened with sugar or aspartame) and donuts which are made up of refined white flour cooked in artery clogging hydrolysed vegetable oils such as Canola which contains genetically modified organisms (GMO’s), a type of frankenfood, after the scary monster Frankenstein, made up of different parts of people all sewn together. On that note, if science says it is two years away from head transplants, why can’t they cure cancer?
That answer is revealed when you study history. Cancer Council Australia commenced in 1961 as the Australian Cancer Society, then the six state Cancer Councils agreed to establish a federal body to promote cancer control at the national level. The rate of cancer in Australia has more than doubled, it is out of control, under the auspices of the Cancer Council their website states that now one in two Australians will get cancer.
For any “thinking person will at this point start scratching their head, because there is something wrong with this picture.
On the Cancer Council website it tries to hammer the alternative health movement of holistic medicine (indigenous, sacred, whole, energetic) which regards food as both medicine and poison. This belief system was the predominant medical training in America before Carnegie and Rockefeller got their hands on the medical education system, effectively banishing holistic medicine to the sidelines in favour of the chemical industry. Mainstream doctors are taught a few things about nutrition, in so far as the standard knowledge that cancer patients should avoid sugar. Yet, in the test to detect cancer patients are injected with sugar.
The Cancer Council are negligent and are misrepresenting the facts in regards to the causes of cancer by tearing down those that prefer to eat good food. For instance their website “The Biggest Morning Tea” states:
- ‘Clean’, ‘raw’, ‘natural’ and ‘paleo’ ingredients: The increasing interest in so-called ‘clean’ eating, ‘raw’ food, and paleo diets has resulted in the creation of ‘healthier’ treat alternatives and the use of ingredients such as rice malt and agave syrups, xylitol, coconut flour and oils, cacao powder, and sea salt flakes. Cancer Council does not endorse these diets, recipes and ingredients to be healthier alternatives as they still contribute to kilojoule, saturated fat, sugar and sodium intake. Recipes using these ingredients may not necessarily be considered healthier recipes, and should be balanced with indulgent recipes that contain more accessible baking ingredients such as sugar, butter and plain flour. (Emphasis mine)
Here the Cancer Council are telling you to eat sugar and plain flour, and are misrepresenting saturated fats, as their explanation is far too simplistic and treats all saturated fats as equal which they are not. Given that sugar is a known favourite food of cancer cells and plain flour is the cause of gluten intolerance, therefore inflammation and immune disorders caused by leaky gut syndrome, why are they telling you to eat it?
If the Cancer Council won’t address the cause of why one in two Australians get cancer, how can they prevent it, or cure it? Isn’t it logical that in order to find the cure for cancer, you first have to find the cause of cancer? If cancer is not something you “catch” then it must be associated with what we put in our mouths and what is absorbed by the skin?
The Cancer Council talks about excessive kilojoule intake, which again is far too simplistic, however they fail to address a far more important count of exposure to chemicals, insecticides and GMOs.
Naturalnews.com reports that sunscreen, which is heavily promoted by the Cancer Council, contains nano particles which are more easily absorbed by the skin and contains ingredients which are carcinogenic. Not only that, but not getting enough sun blocks Vitamin D production by blocking UVB rays and Sunscreen also blocks a pigment called melanin. Vitamin D has proven anti-cancer properties. Why is the Cancer Council ignoring these carcinogenic properties contained in the use of sunscreens?
Could the Cancer Council’s agenda be to secretly promote more cancer through mis-representation, brainwashing and outright negligence, rather than lessening cancer rates? The statistics since 1961 certainly seem to indicate that this is the case.
If we looked closely at the Cancer Council Board of Directors and associates you will most likely be sure to find conflicts of interest and bias as there is sure to be links to pharmaceutical companies, agricultural companies and chemical companies, after all the Cancer Council push chemotherapy drugs, ignoring the fact that chemotherapy was developed from Mustard Gas at Yale University, which is famous for the secretive Yale undergraduate secret society called Skull and Bones.
Further comments welcome.
Article by Lex Stewart
President, Australians for Honest Elections Inc.
With comments by R.L.F.
· Does Government have the competence to fix the voting systems?
· The Joint Standing Committee on Electoral Matters (JSCEM) has failed
· “Vote Early, Vote Often” frauds can continue, unaffected by this report
The report of the JSCEM released on 15 April touched on some longstanding faults in our electoral system, while tackling few of the major issues that need fixing.
“There are some long-running sores that seem to have been avoided by the Joint Committee in its 216-page report, after conducting 21 public hearings and receiving 216 written submissions, including four from this organisation, Australians for Honest Elections”, said AFHE President Lex Stewart.
Our website http://www.afhe.org.au/our-recommendations.html lists in approximate priority order 9 major recommendations to overcome deficiencies in our electoral systems. The JSCEM report has addressed only items 3 and 8 out of our 9.
AFHE President Lex Stewart says, “While we commend the JSCEM in making its recommendation 17 for identity before a person is allowed to vote in person (like the Queensland ID introduced a year ago, which the current ALP government is about to remove), the JSCEM has avoided addressing major issues” such as:-
- the need to require identity before being put onto the Electoral Roll, i.e. the need to delete Commonwealth Electoral Act Sec 98AA (2) (c) which has been used to create thousands of false enrolments (as were used in the recent NSW State election);
- the lack of proper ID for postal voting (this major source of rorting was used recently in Queensland inter alia to rob Pauline Hanson of a seat by a tiny margin);
(Postal voting has long been recognised as fertile ground for cheating, therefore many countries do not allow it. UK Election Commissioner Richard Mawrey QC, who has sent people to jail from both sides of politics, horrified during his visit to Australia 4 years ago, said that ‘postal voting is a recipe for fraud … the system is highly vulnerable at a number of critical points’; yet his concerns have been ignored by JSCEM)
- the need to restore Subdivisional voting – to tackle the multiple voting admitted by the AEC as having been 18,770 in the September 2013 election, yet no prosecutions were done! Nor will any be possible if the JSCEM report recommendations are used!
- the lack of integrity in the Electoral Roll. Pages 75 to 83 of the report can only be described as ‘pathetic’, when one considers what the Australian National Audit Office reports of 2002, 2004 and 2010 said, things which were largely ignored by the AEC.
“AFHE has pointed out many issues to media and JSCEM over the last 19 months, yet they have ignored most of our concerns, based on 22 years of experience,”
“Due to the inadequacies of this JSCEM report coming out over 19 months after the 2013 election, it is plain to all who would be interested in Australia having an honest democracy, that there remain major issues not yet addressed,” said Mr Stewart.
“Whether the Government and Minister Ronaldson are capable of, or interested in, addressing these issues to have honest and fair elections remains to be seen.”
For those of you new to the subject of democracy, and whether or not it exists in our country, you can see plainly that democracy is an illusion. However, reclaiming our “democracy” is a waste of time in reality, since it is a system of Mob (majority) rule. Now this would be fine if the majority had a strong moral code, was capable of using that thing between their ears (the brain = ability to think (analyse; decode reality) and knew the truth about history.
Unfortunately, as the majority of Australians have differing moral codes if any; the ability to think has been stolen by the dumbing down of intellect in the school system, through dangerous additives in vaccinations and poison in our food and water; and fed propaganda and lies as news, this does not behoove a good form of democracy anyway.
The answer is the original model of the American Constitution, a Republic, where we all have inherent rights granted to us at birth, and we are all armed, with a limited and small government, where the sovereign country retains its rights to control its own money supply.
When government considers us a fiction (see the Birth Certificate/Legal Person); and gives us benefits and privileges but does not recognise our inherent rights (human rights); and when the government is controlled by corporations not the people, then we have a problem. A BIG PROBLEM. The stuff that civil wars are fought over, but the civil war of today is an intellectual war, an Information War.
The answer is to regain control of our education system, and control of the courts by restoring the Rule of Law: Common Law which in reality is unobstructed Juries and Grand Juries with the power of Jury Nullification, founded upon the Magna Carta in 1215, which is 800 years old this year (2015) but has largely been repudiated by various Statutes masquerading as law.
“The people perish for lack of knowledge” (Hosea 4:6 KJB).
You can start your journey today down the rabbithole, and find out why our country is becoming more communistic and fascist year in and year out by reading Carroll Quigley’s book “Tragedy and Hope: A History of the World in Our Time”.
And that my friends reminds me of a joke: “What’s 5000 lawyers at the bottom of the ocean? A: A good start”.
The public is invited to attend the Supreme Court Sydney in the hearing of Helen Underwood and Mary Genevieve Gaudron (former High Court Judge) and her sister, Kathryn Theresa Gaudron on Tuesday 25th August 2015 at 10.15am. This is an Appeal in a Family Provision matter and promises to be interesting to say the least. Publication of this appeal is deliberately being kept from the public in the mainstream media.
Get prepared to be spied on once the new Sunshine Coast Council’s Maroochydore Town Centre is built. The Sunshine Coast Council have said they intend for the new Maroochydore city centre to be the “smartest” centre in Australia. They will be installing smart lighting which is the Intellistreets system, which is also being installed in Florida, United States. The communist globalist system are building their Big Brother surveillance grid. George Orwell was right. You will be watched, tracked and face scanned without your knowledge. Be prepared for the streetlights to announce to you that you have speeding fines overdue or to warn you if you light up a cigarette in a non-authorized zone. To see what to expect, click here to watch this short Youtube video on the Intellistreet system:
Teething Problems upset Brandis’ plan to fight online propaganda
The Courier Mail has been at it again on Saturday February 21 2015, citing propaganda and using this as a weapon against the people. The Courier Mail is part of the criminal cabal who have taken over Australia and the western world. Subtle signs are appearing in prominent magazines in South-East Queensland featuring the slogan “New World Order”. The banksters (experts) in collusion with governments own just about everything, as the article from The Guardian titled: “Oxfam: 85 richest people as wealthy as poorest half of the world”, therefore control almost everything. What they don’t control, their government and corporate puppets control. Rupert Murdoch, the owner of the Courier Mail is part of the cabal, and is attempting to control public perceptions and opinions.
The War on Terror, like the War on Drugs and the War on Cancer will never end. Simply put, as testified to in Carroll Quigley’s book “Tragedy and Hope: The History of the World in our Time”, terrorist attacks are usually carried out by one’s own government, who then use the False Flag Terror attacks, like the Lindt café shooting to pass more laws. This bungle in security was more than mere governmental incompetence, it was collusion because they allowed it to happen. The threat of terrorism is an excuse to tax us to death and take away our liberties, so they can spy on us, and then make us pay for it. This is evidenced by article on p18 “Social Media Spies Cast Privacy Aside: Brandis flags $18m plan to fight online propaganda”. Brandis would no doubt class this article as a conspiracy theory, therefore propaganda.
The climate change excuse for taxing us to death can be easily debunked by simply taking a stroll in your local supermarket. If the Australian Governments was worried about climate change then why do we have fish from Tanzania in Coles when the landmass of Australia is a large chunk of land surrounded by water? How much power is used in transporting that fish from Tanzania? Free trade and combating climate change action are incompatible ideologies, therefore there must be an agenda. What is the umbrella ideology but a plot to bring in and enforce communism and socialism by stealth?
The Courier Mail, the Television and Cinema try to control what information we are told and what is truth. This applies to all media including the education system, which has modelled itself on the communist ideologies that the State is God. This was proven by the findings of the 1954 United States House Select Committee to investigate Tax Exempt Foundations influence on education. The United States, in particular Prescott Bush, helped fund Hitler, and the United States helped build up the Soviet Union’s military and industry. The Soviet Union is a false enemy of the United States, and if Brandis believes that terrorism is not funded and supported by the United States Military-Industrial Complex, as Eisenhower warned, then he is a stooge.
The articles on p25 of the Courier Mail are just an example of more lies, damn lies and statistics. The only true story there was the one about a motorcyclist died after hitting a goat. The other articles were propaganda and lies. Take the article calling Teething Problems which is a prime example of George Orwell’s Double-think, citing “… some parents have the idea that they are only milk teeth and will fall out. Kids have these teeth until they are twelve”. Maybe so, but not in all cases, and the teeth certainly do not all suddenly fall out. It is a gradual process, as they fall out the adult teeth grow in their place. The baby teeth are milk teeth and do not need to be filled. That is a lie made by the Dental Association, probably because dentists aren’t making enough money because parents are trying to save costs. Why spend money filling teeth that may fall out in six months’ time? More damn lies and statistics, the Queensland Health Report no doubt would have fiddled with the numbers in order to show a higher incidence of decay in children’s teeth in council areas that don’t have the poison called fluoride in their water supply. The poison fluoride is not a food, but is a poisonous chemical. It is an ingredient in sarin gas, rat poison, Prozac and is a known thyroid disruptor.
I am just so sick of the lies, but it’s not just Murdoch or Brandis, it is every one of the stooges who work for these clowns, who follow orders without thinking. Wilful blindness, criminal negligence, aiding and abetting, call it what you will. That is the type of student they are churning out of high schools and universities these days. Useless idiots who use the excuse that they have a family to feed so can’t afford to upset the applecart, but they are just like Winston Smith in George Orwell’s book “1984”. I do not feel sorry for them at all, and I will laugh at their calamity, when they act without thinking about the consequences. The journalists are Winston Smith. They too are suffering from cancer and eating berries contaminated with shit from China. Duh!!!
Get it through your thick heads, the government and the experts (banksters) don’t care about your health or your bank account. They want you to be sick, so that Big Pharma and the Medical Industry can bleed you dry. Brandis will never get rid of people telling the truth. People like myself are the thorns in their collective sides. As Martin Luther King Jr has said, “The arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends towards justice.” 2+2=4.