MARY GAUDRON FUNDRAISING 101: CORRUPTION AND BIAS EXPOSED IN FAILED FAMILY PROVISION COURT CASE

Court of Appeal, Supreme Court, New South Wales
Underwood v Gaudron [2015] NSWCA 269
heard by Basten JA; Macfarlan JA; and Ward JA\

1.  Bias in the Media
I wrote to Louise Hall recently, a journalist known as a “Court Reporter” with the Sydney Morning Herald, on behalf of Helen Underwood (Mary Genevieve Gaudron’s and Kathryn Teresa Gaudron’s sister). I alerted Louise Hall about the outcome of the Appeal, because when Helen learned she had lost her case for a Family Provision, she was too upset to reply, especially because Hall had refused to acknowledge Helen’s previous emails.  Louise Hall had curtly emailed Helen to ask her about the outcome of her Appeal as she couldn’t be bothered to attend either the hearing or handing down of the judgment.

I also alerted Louise Hall in this initial email to my previous post that said her reporting was “… a blight on the moral landscape” because instead of unbiased reporting, press-titute Louise Hall covered the story about the initial trial, favouring Mary Gaudron, the former High Court Judge.

Helen knew that the Fairfax media machine would continue to lie about the Appeal and that the Sydney Morning Herald would not report on the case, or if it did, it would be a short notice of the outcome only.  There would have been no in-depth research to report the facts of the matter.  According to George Orwell’s famous book “1984”, the omission is the worst type of lie.

As you would expect any bought and paid for press-titute for the Fairfax boys would laud Mary Gaudron’s glorious attributes to the Australian people in order to perpetuate the myth that Australian’s courts are fair and equitable and we live according to the rule of law, when in practice the opposite is true.  Australia is in fact a lawless country whose Constitution was never ratified, and is apparently for sale to the highest bidder.

After Louise Hall announced the dismissal of the appeal on her twitter post, I posted a reply that dared her to write an article on the court case without bias and from a moral standpoint, specifically addressing the question of where is equity and remedy.  I doubt Louise Hall knows the meaning of the words, let alone be capable of writing a essay that would pass the litmus test, a crucial and revealing test in which there is one decisive factor.  If she did have any morals, BIG Brother (the cabal who run the media) would not stand for taking out one of their own, unless of course it was in their own best interests to do so.

Unfortunately for Louise Hall, she has missed out on the chance to break the story, but as many of us are waking up to, the press is no longer independent and unbiased.  Unfortunately the job of educating the public is left to unpaid educators like me to tell the story.

2.  Three Disturbing Factors
As all press-titutes do when giving a favourable head-job to their slave masters; Louise Hall ignored three disturbing factors. The first being that the subject of bias in hearing the case for Family Provision cannot be avoided; the second was that Helen was poor, and thirdly that she was morally due her share of the estate.

3.  Questions That Need Answering
Of the four children, Helen is the only one to not receive a cent, and the one that the court has heaped the costs onto. What did Helen do to deserve the ire from her family?  Helen’s affidavits have asserted blame onto her conniving and cunning sister Mary.  Regardless, we must ask why the Mother’s Will was changed from leaving the estate to all four children to only Mary and Kathryn towards the end of her life.

Another important question that needs to be answered was what provision had the father made for the children especially considering his death predated the mother’s death, and that at the time of his death, divorce proceedings were underway.

The final outcome of the Trial and Appeal were especially strange considering Brother Paul suffered a severe disability due to a childhood accident.  Wouldn’t both or at least one of the parents want to leave a sizeable sum to Brother Paul to cover future employment problems and health care?

The most important question of all is why didn’t the Trial Court and Court of Appeal take these questions into consideration when making their decision?  Although Brother Paul was only named as an interested party in these proceedings, the facts surrounding his role within the family structure certainly clarify Helen’s assertions in her Affidavits.

4.  A Small Estate
Helen is by no means a greedy woman. She would have only received a comparatively small sum from the estate, but to her this small sum would have meant so much more.  It would mean a new life in private accommodation giving her a new start.  She could afford to buy some shoes and some nice clothes, some medical care, a car, update her computer, or even buy a caravan and travel the country.

However it wasn’t the money that motivated Helen to pursue her share of the small estate.  It was the principal of the matter that was the driving factor.  Due to the dysfunctional family relationships, she had an axe to grind and wanted to confront Mary about her behaviour towards herself and her brother.  According to Helen’s affidavits she has known Mary as a serial liar, beginning her quest for fame and glory by using her mother’s favour to get what she wanted, to the exclusion and detriment of her siblings.  Kathryn was known for taking sides that were the most beneficial for her.

As you will see, there are good reasons why Mary Gaudron does not like to dwell on the past and doesn’t like bad press, as reported in Pamela Burton’s unauthorised biography.

5.  A David and Goliath Battle
Helen Underwood, the little sister of Mary Gaudron is the epitome of the mythical David, the underdog. In legal terms Helen’s economic status is known as impecunious, meaning she is seriously disadvantaged.  Helen survives on a small pension and carer’s allowance for her much older ex-husband of $450 per week.  She was self-represented, is not a lawyer although she partially completed her law degree and is self-taught, being a forensic accountant by trade.  To make matters worse she had to travel from Brisbane to Sydney in New South Wales to conduct the lawsuit.

On top of that she had no immediate access to legal representation or legal aid, no immediate access to precedents in NSW using Austlii, having only her own research skills to depend on. To top that off, she was simultaneously confronted on a daily basis with the possibility of an eviction from her housing commission unit because she dared complain about the poor sanitation; having faeces (not hers) flood her unit because the Government failed to address the plumbing problems in the unit block.  She is still facing a possible eviction due to the three strikes and you’re out policy of the Queensland government.

In direct contrast Mary Gaudron is Goliath of a figure in legal circles and the history of Australia.  She receives a judicial pension of $6,000 per week plus entitlements which equates to over $312,000 annually.  We should all feel sorry for the former High Court Judge (she who cannot be named) who obviously cannot manage on her judicial pension and her property portfolio (Struggle Street, I think not!).

She owns the townhouse at Lilyfield, an inner Sydney Suburb valued at $900,000 plus; a Beach House property at Greater Mackeral Beach in Northern Sydney on the Newport peninsula with a minimum value of $750,000; two properties in the Loire Valley, France (no value disclosed), all the while being Director of Hefano Pty Ltd which owns/manages fifteen (15) units in Newtown, a unit at Elizabeth Bay, both inner Sydney Suburbs, up to here admitted to.  Her first husband just died.  A Google Search shows Juan Investments Pty Ltd owns/manages units, the number not known with a possible location in Neutral Bay, Newtown.  The net yearly property income for a singular person as employee is some $315,000 (also $6,000 per week).

That means the former High Court Judge, now retired, is on a weekly income somewhere in the vicinity of between $6000 and $12,000 per week.  That’s up to a whopping $624,000 per year.

To top it all off, the subject of bias cannot be avoided due to her sister’s special status in the legal community, being a former High Court judge, and being senior to the judges sitting in the Supreme Court of Appeal.  Mary Gaudron was a specialist expert in the field of succession law and family provision law, receiving the Sydney University Medal for Succession Law.

While Mary Gaudron is a protected species, having easy access to case precedents, and open access to corruption at its worst, Helen was resigned to use the light of truth, often calling on her strong belief in Archangel Michael to help see her through difficult times.  Helen said that the ordeal of the trial and appeal was a “… pressure cooker from start to finish … the sheer severity and serious disadvantage was hell”.

6.  The Two Page Will
The two page Will generated a 105 page judgement from the initial trial with a transcript of 129 pages, while the Appeal totalled 39 pages of transcript, with all submissions ignored, generating a Dismissal Judgement of just 37 pages. This alone makes one wonder how a two page Will could generate such a long judgement yet be so glibly dismissed on Appeal.  It doesn’t make sense for reasons that will be explored in further detail below.

7.  The Trial
Helen was prepared to run the case on her own, however the trial judge recommended Helen have legal representation, and the barrister assigned for her on a No Win No Fee basis was Therese Catanzariti. This is where Helen’s problems started.  Therese Catanzariti was incompetent and was infatuated by the Defendant, Mary Gaudron.

Barrister Therese Catanzariti failed to object to the Judge’s decision not to record a transcript; failed to read into evidence an important affidavit, and wouldn’t listen to her client’s directions.  Helen accused her of being unable to comprehend the English language.

8.  The Appeal
Helen found out that Ruth McColl was the original judge set down to hear the Appeal along with Basten J. and McFarlan J., however Ward J. was substituted for McColl J. at the last minute. Helen had previously found out, after speaking to a lawyer friend that McColl was ruthless, and that Basten J. was being put in the same position as Dyson Heydon, having to make a decision on his own previous decision, and that McFarlan J. was the thorough gentleman.

After doing some research on the internet, Helen found that McColl J. Had said this on Mary’s Wikipedia page:  “Former President of the New South Wales Bar, Ruth McColl, described Gaudron’s contribution to Australian law as “an extraordinarily humanising effect… the strong views she expresses in cases involving discrimination and like issues, are very influential and important in the development of the law in those areas.”  Helen immediately rang Karla in the Registry and told them she wasn’t happy with McColl J. and warned Registry that she would immediately put McColl on Notice. 

During the Appeal, the problems in the Lower Court were to be exasperated by the lack of acknowledgment of ‘apprehended’ bias that is the ‘appearance of’ not the ‘actuality of’ bias, whereby Helen was required to prove actual bias.  There was also a presumption of infallibility.

Whenever the name on the document “Mary Genevieve Gaudron” was viewed it would instantly summon an apprehension of bias by any hypothetical observer.  The trial judge’s instruction to court reporters to only record the orders on the day and not a transcript, therefore did not record the actual details before the court and the fact that an important affidavit was not read into evidence was evidence of protecting another Judge.  Helen also valiantly tried to get evidence admitted into the Appeal that was not in evidence at the time of the trial.

During the Appeal, the penny seemingly dropped for Ward J. that there were four different versions of the same Will, however they sought to trap Helen by putting incorrect words in her mouth.  The decision was initially reserved.

9.  Proof the Appeal Was Pre-Judged
Helen was so glad to have received what appeared like a fair trial; however a lawyer friend said to her that the appearance of a fair trial is a misnomer because “if they were inclined to not allow your appeal, it explains why you got such a good hearing. They often do that, if you are going to go down”.

Further the Judgement in favour of a Dismissal did not refer to the nineteen Acts and Rules Helen was referring to.  She used the case of Collette and Knox [2010] QSC 132 (unrep) McMeekin J, an unreported case in Queensland which does not appear in the references in the Judgement.  This is an extremely important case as it has become known as the “Collette Principal”, including Barrister Treston’s writings on “Succession: Emerging Issues”. The mere fact that these cases were not included in the references of the Dismissal of the Appeal proves the decision was written prior to the Appeal being heard.

10.  Criticism of Mary Gaudron on Wikipedia Backs up Helen and Paul’s Affidavits
Wikipedia states that at the time of her appointment to the High Court in 1987, the New South Wales legal magazine Justinian (magazine)published anonymous remarks saying that “a melancholy catalogue of sins of omission and commission … ” ought to have weighed against her appointment, and that she held “an emotional disposition inappropriate in a holder of judicial office.” When Gaudron announced her retirement, an anonymous academic said that … among the other High Court Justices, Gaudron was “erratic” and “certainly not among the court’s greats.” Another anonymous academic said that Gaudron’s Labor connections had delivered unearned promotion.

11.  Intention, Corruption and Bias
Gaudron hates her own sister so much Helen alleges she has had to resort to forgery, misappropriation, misrepresentation and maladministration to ensure that Helen was left destitute. Mary Gaudron took money from the estate for her own purposes in order to pay a private arrangement between herself and her brother Paul resulting from their father’s death in 1982.  Mary Gaudron loves her brother so much she tricked him into signing a form that stopped him from seeking any further monies from the estate.

Gaudron was so used to lying about her sister, she stooped lower than low by committing perjury, deception and misleading the Supreme Court NSW to pervert the course of justice and everything in-between to ensure her sister did not receive any money or property or even a memento whatsoever.  Gaudron hid their mother’s death intentionally and Helen was never to find out in time.  The family joined in by keeping the death hidden from Helen.  Gaudron resorted to the full length breadth and depths of legal mis-conduct (professional and unconscionable) in order to not notify Helen who was an interested litigant.  This barely “allowable” method of conduct would only have been known to her being a specialist expert in Succession Law and Family Provision Law,

Gaudron has relied on access to corruption at its worst.  She could not face loss of her public standing on merit and has to be the protected species by buddies in the judiciary.  Whatever happened to their judicial oath?

12.  Brother Paul Exposes Mary’s True Nature
Brother Paul’s Affidavit corroborates Helen’s contention that her sisters and extended family purposely kept the death of her mother from her. Mary’s true colours were exposed when Paul lost his leg in an accident as a young boy; his father advised him that he and his late mother did not seek compensation for his accident on advice from his sister Mary and her university lecturers.   At the same time Paul’s father promised that he would leave him the house and all his property, as his way of providing Paul with some form of compensation for the accident.  Not only did Mary prevent Paul from receiving any form of compensation to go towards medical expenses, she thought it fitting that $80,000, a mere fraction of her annual salary, was sufficient for his future medical expenses and care.

13.  Explosive Family Secret of Aboriginality Revealed
There were some explosive family secrets revealed such as her brother Paul, DNA tested, proved his aboriginality, and therefore there is a strong probability that Mary, Kathryn and Helen are also aboriginal. Paul admitted his aboriginality in an affidavit, stating that his many medical expenses are paid to him through the Australian Government Closing the Gap (CTG) programme.  This revelation has many contentious implications for the Mabo hearings.  Mary Gaudron’s biography would be inaccurate if it did not also record that she was also the first aboriginal to be appointed to the High Court.

In Helen’s Affidavit she stated “In the event the death or incapacity of one or both defendants prior to the conclusion of these proceedings order the verification of the family’s aboriginal bloodline by accessing documents held by Births, Deaths & Marriages New South Wales or elsewhere”.  Of course now she is still denied the ability to claim ‘next of kin’ status; not an executor/administrator or a beneficiary under her mother’s will, with the documents protected by the mother’s privacy.  Even though the case has been dismissed the bloodline will in time be verified as Helen does further research.

14.  Further Explosive Revelations of Attempted Strangulation
Helen’s affidavit further alleges that Mary attempted to strangle her to death when she was a Baby.

15.  Corruption Embedded in Mary Gaudron’s Career
Of course, we don’t believe for one minute that Mary Gaudron succeeded because of her determination. More than likely the real story is that the well-known ladies man, Robert J. Hawke, former Prime Minister of Australia (1983-1991) granted her a favour or two.  Did Gaudron open her legs to make the appointment stick?

If you are wondering why the case was dismissed, you need only look at Gaudron’s moral backbone of being a labor (read socialist/communist) sympathiser.  Looking at Gaudron’s and Michael Kirby’s connection when younger to the communist agenda, they obviously took the much more time honoured approach of patience, a feature of Fabian Socialism, rather than the raw brutality and police state approach of communism.  When I saw Michael Kirby at a legal dinner, he wore his gold symbol of the brotherhood loud and proud.  In fact it does seem odd does it not, that in a time of great discrimination against gays and women, that a gay man and a woman would succeed in gaining the highest and most respectful jobs in the land?

In the time of corruption in the Neville Wran and Joh Bjelke-Peterson governments, Gaudron was NSW Solicitor General.  She was friends with a number of people of bad character such as Lionel Murphy, a disgraced former High Court Judge; Norman Thomas William Allan(­Chief Commissioner of police NSW 1962-1972)  and Sir Robert William Askin (32nd Premier of New South Wales 1965-1975).  There were many people that joined the divide between Queensland and New South Wales.  In the corruption scandal that engulfed the government of Joh Bjelke Peterson and the Wran Government, it is not too far-fetched to say that Mary Gaudron had an interest in keeping the lid on information getting out to the public, because she was directly involved.  Could this be the reason she advised the Wran Government that any member of the police be provided with disincentives to block them from coming forward with further information in regard to the Age Tapes.  There can be no doubt that Gaudron’s advice helped protect her Labor “mates” including Lionel Murphy.

Sir Robert ASKIN (premier of NSW) and Norman Thomas William Allan 1967 (Police Commissioner NSW) and Shirley Margaret Brifman were involved in the Fitzgerald Inquiry in Qld

Wikipedia states that the allegations of corruption against Askin were revived in 2008 when Alan Saffron, the son of the late Sydney crime boss Abe Saffron, published a biography of his father in which he alleged that Saffron had paid bribes to major public officials including Askin, former police commissioner Norman Allan, and other leading figures whom he claimed he could not name because they were still alive. Alan Saffron alleged that his father made payments of between $5000 and $10,000 per week to both men over many years that Askin and Allan both visited Saffron’s office on several occasions that Allan also visited the Saffron family home, and that Abe Saffron paid for an all-expenses overseas trip for Allan and a young female ‘friend’. He also alleged that, later in Askin’s premiership, Abe Saffron became the “bagman” for Sydney’s illegal liquor and prostitution rackets and most illegal gambling activities, collecting payoffs that were then passed to Askin, Allan and others, in return for which his father was completely protected.”

The young female friend could have been the prostitute Shirley Margaret Brifman who was on Askin’s and Allen’s payroll at the time.  Brifman, 35, was supposedly found dead by her teenage daughter Mary Anne and supposedly ended her life in her Brisbane safe house on March 4, 1972, after fleeing Sydney.  Police declared a suspected drug overdose, and did not order an autopsy, however in one article it was stated that the daughter claimed that it was not a drug overdose as a person had visited that night and threatened her mother, and in another article the daughter said her mother was overdosing all the time, and still in another article that a woman who visited Brifman handed her a vial of drugs, telling Brifman to end her life or her children would be targeted.

Brifman was due to be the chief witness against a senior Queensland detective in a perjury case.  Brifman had been paying graft to corrupt police since the late 1950s, and in 1971 had gone on national television and blown the whistle on officers in both Queensland and NSW.  It is believed Shirley Brifman was murdered because she had arranged a live interview with the ABC to blow the whistle on Askin and Allen.

The plot thickens when Helen alleges that at the time of Shirley Margaret Brifman’s murder, Mary Gaudron also lived in the same apartment complex in Elizabeth Bay which was her family home.  Helen said that she thought Brifman was shot in the Elizabeth Bay unit, and she never knew anything about her fleeing to Clayfield, Brisbane, which is the story currently circulating in newspapers.  Considering the file on Brifman was supposedly destroyed and there was a gag order placed on the file contents for up to sixty years, it is clear that there has been a monumental cover-up concerning Shirley Margaret Brifman’s murder.

16.  Losing the Battle to Win the War
In another similar David and Goliath story of the McLibel case in the UK, McDonalds won its court case against some activists, but lost the war of public opinion.  While Mary Gaudron may have won the battle over the Will, moral activists can win the war of public opinion, so if you like this story, please make it go viral to force this story be covered on mainstream media.

QLD LABOR RAMPS UP LNP FASCIST LAWS PROVING A ONE PARTY STATE

Queensland Labor Attorney General Yvette D’Ath is proving herself to be just as unpopular with Queenslanders as Campbell Newman.  According to the Friday’s edition of the Courier Mail on 19 June 2015, “Drinkers face Random Bar Booze testing from Police”.

This cultural shift will disrupt the good old Aussie tradition of buying your mates a beer at the local bar if the police Gestapo are allowed to turn up at essentially private outings by Queenslanders, without a warrant, and demand that you blow in the bag in order to build a case for the government prosecution for the pre-crime of violence.

What about the consent of the governed?  What happens to those people who refuse to blow in the bag?  Will the government charge them with being violent in a public place, like they charge drivers for being drunk behind the wheel if they refuse to submit to a breath test?  .

Or perhaps the Labor government will charge non-violent dissenters with being drunk and disorderly?  Will they hand dissenters fines, or will the police get violent towards the non-violent dissenters, handcuff them and throw them in the watchhouse for being drunk, violent and disorderly because they refuse to submit?  Will dissenters lose their right to go out and become banned from nightclub precincts altogether if they don’t submit?  Will continual dissent see normal law-abiding citizens end up in jail for pre-crime offences?

Will licensed pubs, clubs and restaurants be placed under economic duress by becoming unwitting targets in the further fascist crackdown to control the movement and actions of otherwise law-abiding citizens?

When will the young people wake up from their slumber?  Everyone in Queensland particularly young people need to learn Jurisdictionary® so they can protect and enforce their rights in a court of law without spending a large amount of money on expensive lawyers.

 

Communism Campbell Newman’s wet dream

Can Do?

Can Do? (Photo credit: dale.n)

Thank you for the Brisbane Times Article titled “Campbell Newman taking lessons from Vladimir Putin“, Peter Callaghan Sc (president of the Law and Justice Institute (Qld) Inc).  Your article was well written and it is agreed that the Government are quickly becoming despised by its citizens, however Mr Callaghan appears to be of the mistaken opinion that Russia is a democracy.  Although it appears on the surface this is the case, it is common knowledge amongst truth-seekers (the establishment refer to as conspiracy theorists) that communism went underground in Russia.  If Russia or North Korea does not have a Jury Justice system, then like Queensland, it does not have truth and justice either.

Callaghan says that “What makes our democracy different is respect for conventions like judicial independence, engagement with the parliamentary process, and adherence to the rule of law” which I challenge on the following basis:

1.  Like Russia, Queensland has democracy in name only.

2,  Judicial independence means that judges are free to nullify bad laws, therefore are independent of government.  Independance can only be achieved under a jury justice system as any single judge is open to threat or bribes.  QUT (Queensland University of Technology) Law School teaches that judges don’t have the power to nullify bad laws.  Only randomly chosen jurors are independent, and only jury nullification has the power to nullify bad law.  One Judge Star Chambers starkly demonstrate that there is no judicial independence here in Queensland.

3,  There is no engagement in the parilamentary process.  Last time Queensland had a Referendum in 1917 the people rejected the Upper House being removed, but it was illegally removed anyway in 1922, and any engagement that does not toe the party line is quickly demonised and dealt with.  It’s pure fantasy to believe a unicameral government system in Queensland is democratic.

4.  Adherence to the Rule of Law (see Point 2).  What is lawful and what is legal are two entirely different things.

Rightly said Mr Callaghan that “it cloaks daggers aimed at the heart of the rule of law”, because what have here in Queensland is a New World City – headquarters of the New World Order, a fascist communist dictatorship which has been in the making for approximately 150 years.  This plot ties in the assassinations of John F Kennedy and Harold Holt, and a number of other people.

The Nazi’s never lost WWII.  Welcome to the Fourth Reich.

 

Was Graham Rynders set-up by Newman Government to create the Queensland Gestapo?

Post by Renaissance Learning Foundation

Martin Bryant

Martin Bryant (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Where to begin?  Having seen the video of the infamous Port Arthur Massacre which was on You Tube for a brief time showed ALL the victims had been shot in the head.  If I was on a jury I would vote in favour of it being a professional hit rather than the murderous aggression supposedly displayed by one man, an intellectually challenged man called Martin Bryant who looks like a peaceful hippy dude.  I don’t believe the story in the Courier Mail on the weekend just gone where Rupert Murdoch’s journalists push the story that Martin Bryant had a look of murderous intent according to a third hand hearsay of a supposed guard assigned to protect Bryant.

Australia - Queensland - Queensland Police

The set-up or conspiracy surrounding Graham Rynders, former Assistant Police Commissioner of Queensland, and the new Bikie Laws set to be rammed through the Queensland Parliament, without the Fitzgerald Report’s recommended Committee Review, is prima facie evidence that the Queensland Government is out of control.  I would even go so far to say that the Campbell Newman lead Queensland Government has lost control of the State to those “faceless men” that the politicians keep referring to.

Word around the water cooler is that there’s a hit out on Campbell Newman, which would explain the crackdown of security around the Queensland Parliament.  After winning government his rapid unpopularity with Queenslanders leaves about 95% of the population with a grudge against him and his stupid laws.

One of 20 bikies from some gang

However I suspect these laws that are being passed on bikie gangs are directives which have been passed down via the United States Government, given that Brisbane will be holding the G20 in Brisbane next year.  Is our Fuhrer, Campbell Newman, a Dictator, or are his hands literally tied behind his back?  Has he been told to toe the line or get a bullett in the head, which is one of the favoured means of assassinations upon which the government can seize upon a “story” like the “story” that Lee Harvey Oswald, a lone gunman assassinated JFK, and magic bullett theory.  It is the fiftieth anniversary of the JFK assassination and Sixty Minutes is still pumping this stupid theory while simultaneously ignoring all the evidence, so they can shout TERRORIST to support the ramp up of more laws like the Patriot Act, or if the powers that be decided they didn’t want it public, Mr Newman would find himself in a very nasty car accident like Princess Di and Princess Grace, using an assassination technique called the Boston Brakes technique.

Back to Graham Rynders.  Rumour has it that this whole episode started when Campbell Newman rang now retired ex-Assistant Police Commissioner Kathy Rynders to ask her to go to Bundaberg to do the Flood Report.  She flatly refused but Mr Newman told her to think about it and that he would ring her back.  Upon the second phone call Kathy Rynders again flatly refused to interrupt her retirement with any work commitments.

Campbell Newman then asked Brett Pointing to go to Bundaberg to do the Flood Report which he accepted.  Did Brett Pointing conditionally consent to Newman’s request, with his reward being a raise and promotion?  Alternatively, was Newman leaned upon, perhaps by ex-Queensland Police Commissioner Atkinson to use Pointing to further the LNP’s agenda?  Brett Pointing has used Atkinson as a referee, so it is reasonable to suggest that they have a connection, which could be just friends, or possibly there is connection with freemasonry, given Penelope Wensley had an appointment at the PRIVATE Masonic Centre in Ann Street, Brisbane that had something to do with Pointing.  Was Newman leaned upon to parachute FBI Trained Bulldog Brett Pointing into position down the Gold Coast?

Rumour also has it that Graham Rynders was set-up by Queensland Police Commissioner Stewart or someone else of equal or higher authority, because when Graham Rynders learned he was being kicked out of the Gold Coast he went to his boss or someone of higher authority and was told to take a holiday and go shooting and that it would all be taken care of by the time he returned.  However, while Graham Rynders was away on holiday, suddenly the papers run with the exact opposite story that Rynders was missing in action when the bikie brawl took place.

The Bikie Brawl had to be a set-up by the police &/or the Government (ASIO) to oust Graham Rynders from his post, and to remove his standing and power within police ranks. The whole bikie thing stinks to high heaven.  It is a beat up.  Their rap sheet is pretty weak when you take out the drug charges and failing to appear.

Anyway, the Iran Contra scandal showed that it is certain people within the government that are the ones that ship the guns and smuggle the drugs, and the worldwide drug trade has no trade barriers, and the tentacles reach into the highest places.  Sure, the bikies could be involved in the drug trade, but the Mr Bigs are the untouchables – the ones with the network of power of blood oaths to conceal and never reveal as in the Freemasonic Order, High initiates in positions of power can control the evidence and control the media.

The killing of Damian Leeding who was shot in the head was the mark of a hit, possibly because Damian Leeding knew too much, or was about to talk.  The attempted hit on Gary Hamrey has the same hallmarks, however it was either a warning, or Hamrey was very lucky.  Whatever the case, it is reasonable to suggest that the hits emanated from the government or police or ASIO or even the CIA, which are the real Nazi’s.

The JFK Assassination (John F. Kennedy) showed clearly the links and that the American Nazi’s actually won WWII, and that JFK’s assassination was a coup d’etat to overthrow the American Government.  Australian Archives show that there was a Nazi gang here just after the war, and their diagram indicating how they were going to infiltrate and run the Australian government, with Black Ops to keep and take control of dissenters.

The ASIO and CIA are linked by the common fact that Australia’s Parliament has a Capitol Hill, and America has Capitol Hill, and the Vatican also has a Capitol Hill.  Both America’s private Federal Reserve (which is not Federal and has no reserves) and the private Reserve Bank of Australia commenced in 1913.  That is not a mere coincidence.

The signs and symbols are satanic in meaning and nature, and these people who have the real power live to control and kill and wreck havoc.  The assassins work for the bankers, the Rothschilds who are Zionists and who apparently own 80% of IS-RA-EL.  It’s not about the money, it’s about control for the sake of control.

Rynders had been told not to quit, but to wait until the Newman sacks him because the stingy LNP will then have to fork out about $300,000 to pay him out.

 

Lawyers soon to suffer at hands of New World Order

SOME GOOD NEWS IF YOU HATE LAWYERS

Caricature of William Ballantine. Caption read...

Caricature of William Ballantine. Caption reads “He resisted the temptation to cross-examine a Prince of the blood”. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

A law conference called the 8th Annual LawTech Summit & Awards is soon to be held on 12th & 13th September 2013 at Outrigger Little Hastings St, Resort, Noosa in Queensland. Now that the mainstream media have declared that Queensland is home of the New World Order according to Channel 7’s Today Tonight‘s Report on the Queensland Plan (read the implementation of the United Nations Agenda 21 program), and the good news, if you generally despise lawyers, is that they will all soon be out of a job and will be lining up at the soup kitchens.  Hooray!

The website says that lawyers are next for tech-driven outsourcing.  Bet there are plenty of you having a glass of champagne over that good news (sucked in Benjamin Pan of Pan and Partners and QUT tutor and Stewart Webster, Barrister – looks like you’ll be out of a job sooner than I could have hoped).

The keynote speaker Lawtech Summit, Mr Kowalski says computers themselves will take over much of the brain work that keeps lawyers in jobs.  See, we always suspected lawyers had a case of vacuous incoherence, motivated by money to the exclusion of actually thinking about what they were arguing about.  So you lawyers, you have done yourselves out of your own job.  Congratulations!

You see, the Fabian Socialists and Freemasons are sneaky bastards.  Their motto is two steps forward, one step back, but now they have taken one step too far.

Now that the Satanists have gotten in their little clause in the Carbon Tax Act and Carbon Farming Act that computers will make the decisions with Magistrates enforcing the decision, the New World Order is asking itself, well if Campbell Newman and the Parliament are God, and the Statutes are King, we don’t need lawyers, we just need a Law App.

Disclaimer:  The Law App does not come with batteries, nor instructions.  The Queensland Government takes no responsibility nor liability for programing or other errors or agendas that may appear in decisions from time to time.  There is no button for Human Rights so stop looking.  All decisions of management are final.

Lawyers, welcome to the New World Order.  You are now obsolete.  Ha Ha Ha.

Nazi Loophole in Court Case Damning Evidence of Syria Rhetoric as Australia Takes United Nations Chair

BRISBANE.  5 September 2013.

Gas mask, 14 June 2011

GAS LEAK today in Banyo.  Six people taken to hospital and 60 people treated yet the ABC News tells everyone there’s nothing to worry about, its just the stenching agent.  Nothing to see here folks, but the ABC News won’t tell you that the stenching agent is called Ethyl mercaptan and if you look at the Material Safety Data Sheet http://www.mathesongas.com/pdfs/msds/MAT09070.pdf you’ll see its not safe.  Oh, but it’s all about the poor children.

Read the Herald Sun article:  http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/national/suspected-gas-leak-has-brisbane-suburb-banyo-in-lockdown-forces-evacuation-of-earnshaw-state-college-and-sandgate-district-high/story-fnii5v70-1226711262053

It was only because the leak was so noticeable by so many people that the authorities  had to look as they they were doing something.  However, as you’ll see in the Court Case below, the government’s poodles, the Courts, are of the opinion that adults can go to hell as far as any complaint about fumes.

2007 book cover

COURT CASE NUMBER BS7688/13; 3872/12; 11875/10 Byrnne and Morrison Enterprises Pty Ltd & Ors v Skyey Property Developments Pty Ltd will live in infamy as damning evidence of the hypocrisy coming from the Australian Government who will take its advisement on Syria from the United States.  Will the United Nations now be run by the the British Establishment via United States, with Australia as its willing patsy?  Or is Rudd, a Fabian Socialist, a double agent for China, especially since China is building a secret tunnel to Capitol Hill in Canberra from its new Embassy?  Whatever is going on, we are being lied to by the world hegemonic interests, which are vying to bring in their New World Order.

The Chinese landlord, Simon Wang or Ting-yuan Simon Wang of Skyey Property Developments Pty Ltd brought an action in the Brisbane Magistrates Court for prospective rent for its premises at 14 Austin Street Newstead.  The defendants, via their solicitors mounted a defence of Breach of Quiet Enjoyment because they were being periodically gassed by dangerous fumes.

The premises next door had been leased three months before, unbeknownst to the defendant, to a car refinishing business spray-painting outfit.  The business at 12 Austin Street in the three months appeared closed and had a for lease sign displayed.  The day after signing the lease the defendants visited the premises to collect the keys from the Real Estate Agent and met their Insurance Agent at the property.  Both properties were separated only by a fence just over six foot, and during the defendants’ visit they all smelt strong paint fumes which were overpowering.

The Defendant’s Insurance Agent was so concerned about this that he put his phone over the fence and took a photograph as he was concerned that this would affect the Business’ Public Liability Insurance which incidentally had to be signed over to the Landlord.  There were a four witnesses, all who gave evidence they smelt strong fumes.  One witness leaned over the fence to take a quick look and another witness saw the young man who was spraying run up the back of the yard gasping for breath.

Although the Defendants had what anyone with any common sense would consider very strong evidence by way of witness testimony, oral testimony from the spray painter of the product name, 1K Primer Sealer, together with a written letter (Exhibit 7) from the spray painter evidencing that the spraying happened.

Other photographs were submitted and email that proved that the painting continued. The important points were corroborated between the defendants and plaintiffs in oral evidence, the Defendant’s credibility was damaged beyond repair when the Magistrate Dwyer from Mackay ordered the Defendant’s witness from the Court room for opening the Bible in the witness box, even though the Defendant was not being addressed at the time.  This was reported in the Courier Mail as First Year Law Student Thrown out of the court for opening the bible – should know better.  This was also discussed on ABC or 4BC talkback radio.

Further, the Defendant had made a complaint to the Workplace Health and Safety which is sub-section of the Justice Department, however because the Defendant could not produce this evidence, the Defendant’s credibility was damaged beyond repair.

The Defendant’s/Appellants defence and trial was mishandled by its previous two lawyers, and the Defendant/Appellant was then stuck with the poor arguments made, even though the Practice Directions state that “ordinarily” previous arguments must be adhered to.

The Defendant had received an email from the Workplace Health and Safety Advisory Services several days before the trial that said the that the Defendant had complained against itself.  A year or so later the Department was asked again, and they emailed back the true and accurate complaint that it had made about the fumes.

The first email was sent the day after the election of the Queensland election of the Liberal Government under Campbell Newman.  The Defendant reasonably believes that Labor’s lackeys were still in place, and that the initial email was sent to not only cover up the Department’s inaction, but to also cover-up any complaints about fumes from gas because Anna Bligh, a 33rd Degree Freemason of the secret society of the Red Garter, had rushed through environmental approvals for gas fracking throughout Queensland.

There is much to write about here, but suffice to say if you want to read more the links are below and more will be added soon:

Interestingly Benjamin Pan of Pan and Partners was a Queensland University of Technology (QUT) tutor at the same time as the Appellant was a First year law student.  Benjamin Pan’s verbal and written declaration that this bible incident never happened in the Appellant’s Application to the Supreme Court of Appeal was an act of perjury.  Russell Walters, a lawyer who has been struck off- quipped in the attempted mediation that “some people like that smell”.  The young good-looking barrister for the Respondent, Stewart Webster, who liked the sound of his own voice also acted in a way contrary to what anyone would ordinarily call Justice.

The defendant was stopped from Appealing to the Supreme Court of Appeal in an Application as the “law” allows the Respondent to ask for a Security Bond of costs before an Appeal will be heard.  This is putting the cart before the horse, and this clause has obviously been inserted to stop the uppity slaves from getting justice against its more monetarily powerful masters.

So finally, in essence, the courts are ignoring oral and written evidence and are failing to uphold any semblance of human rights we have here in Queensland which are implied in the Queensland Workplace Health and Safety Legislation and the Criminal Code of Queensland.

Subsequently, the rhetoric espoused by the Western hegemonic dictators, is just that, rhetoric.  They don’t really care about the people in Syria, and they don’t care about us here in Australia, otherwise they wouldn’t be fracking everywhere and destroying our water tables.  How Obama’s love bombs could be claimed to be protecting people is beyond logic, and is therefore Beyond Treason.