QLD LABOR RAMPS UP LNP FASCIST LAWS PROVING A ONE PARTY STATE

Queensland Labor Attorney General Yvette D’Ath is proving herself to be just as unpopular with Queenslanders as Campbell Newman.  According to the Friday’s edition of the Courier Mail on 19 June 2015, “Drinkers face Random Bar Booze testing from Police”.

This cultural shift will disrupt the good old Aussie tradition of buying your mates a beer at the local bar if the police Gestapo are allowed to turn up at essentially private outings by Queenslanders, without a warrant, and demand that you blow in the bag in order to build a case for the government prosecution for the pre-crime of violence.

What about the consent of the governed?  What happens to those people who refuse to blow in the bag?  Will the government charge them with being violent in a public place, like they charge drivers for being drunk behind the wheel if they refuse to submit to a breath test?  .

Or perhaps the Labor government will charge non-violent dissenters with being drunk and disorderly?  Will they hand dissenters fines, or will the police get violent towards the non-violent dissenters, handcuff them and throw them in the watchhouse for being drunk, violent and disorderly because they refuse to submit?  Will dissenters lose their right to go out and become banned from nightclub precincts altogether if they don’t submit?  Will continual dissent see normal law-abiding citizens end up in jail for pre-crime offences?

Will licensed pubs, clubs and restaurants be placed under economic duress by becoming unwitting targets in the further fascist crackdown to control the movement and actions of otherwise law-abiding citizens?

When will the young people wake up from their slumber?  Everyone in Queensland particularly young people need to learn Jurisdictionary® so they can protect and enforce their rights in a court of law without spending a large amount of money on expensive lawyers.

 

COUNTDOWN TO THE APPEAL AGAINST MARY GENEVIEVE GAUDRON FORMER HIGH COURT JUDGE

The countdown is on for the public to get a rare glimpse of the former High Court Judge, Mary Genevieve Gaudron’s life, as she sits in the courtroom as a defendant against her sister Helen Underwood, in an Appeal on a family provision matter, bringing insight into the private family saga that served as the backdrop to a political era that defined the Nation.

The whole sorry state of affairs, which concerns a small estate and an alleged two page Will written by their mother, has generated a judgement in excess of one hundred pages. The Plaintiff, Mary Gaudron’s sister, now known as Helen Underwood changed her name so as to not be identified with her sister, lives off a meager pension and has housing assistance.  Helen will be representing herself against not only a former high court judge, but someone who was awarded a University of Sydney Medal for Law for her work in Estate Law.

An interesting fact that identifies why Mary Genevieve Gaudron rose to such high ranks in the law was because she had an eidetic or photographic memory, and this by itself does not mean she has handed down law using any common sense or wisdom, or indeed morals.  However, Mary Gaudron’s rise to the esteemed heights of the first woman to sit on the High Court Bench, means that she is considered a veritable “god” by many in the field of law who look up to her and hold her in the highest regard, including the Judges, the Registrars and all the underling Barristers.  It is therefore unlikely that her sister, Helen Underwood, will be afforded a fair appeal hearing or judgement unless the public can fill the courtroom with concerned Australians to bear witness and hold the court to account. How can there be a fair trial or appeal when the painted image of the defendant hangs in the court itself?  No Judge who hears the matter comes with clean hands and without ingrained bias.

Interestingly the Sydney Morning Herald’s journalist Louise Hall wrote on July 28th 2014 that “… Mary Gaudron was a judge in the highest court in Australia, sitting on landmark cases such as Mabo and Wik … earning a reputation as a passionate advocate for equality and human rights”.  However Mary Gaudron’s raw emotional display of hatred for her sister thus far contradicts any supposed display of advocacy for equality and human rights When Mary Gaudron is kept on a high paid judicial pension with fringe benefits, she has shown by her actions she does not have an equitable bone in her body.  Mary Gaudron’s actions have shown that she has taken great delight in the fact that her sister cannot afford medical care or a decent pair of shoes.  It is indeed unfortunate that the Sydney Morning Herald coldly disregards her sister’s plight of being poor, over the joyous reporting that the former High Court Judge won the initial trial.  That the journalist Louise Hall cannot see anything wrong with suffering and inequity is a blight on the moral landscape.  Shame, shame, shame.

Perhaps this post might inspire Mary Gaudron to reconsider and settle with her sister thereby avoiding a return to court.

Otherwise you can be assured that after the Appeal, and a judgement has been handed down, that there will be a lengthy article followed up by a expose and a tell-all book that will be a fitting final chapter to Pam Burton’s book about Mary Gaudron, “From Moree to Mabo:  The Mary Gaudron Story”

 

Invitation:
The public is invited to attend the Supreme Court Sydney in the hearing of Helen Underwood and Mary Genevieve Gaudron (former High Court Judge) and her sister, Kathryn Theresa Gaudron on Tuesday 25th August 2015 at 10.15am.  

Countdown to the Appeal:  0 days to go.

Publication of this appeal is deliberately being kept from the public in the mainstream media.  Infact,  “She,  who cannot be named” has perhaps through influence and favours, hijacked the last post of this blog which advised the public of the upcoming appeal, with those words suspiciously missing from google searches.  This repost attempts to remedy that matter.

UPDATE:  The Decision was reserved and is expected to be handed down on the morning of Tuesday 8th September 2015.  An in-depth article will be posted soon after the decision.

Electoral Report fails to address some big Issues: Australian Democracy is an Illusion

Article by Lex Stewart
President, Australians for Honest Elections Inc.
www.afhe.org.au
With comments by R.L.F.

 ·       Does Government have the competence to fix the voting systems?
 ·       The Joint Standing Committee on Electoral Matters (JSCEM) has failed
 ·       “Vote Early, Vote Often” frauds can continue, unaffected by this report

The report of the JSCEM released on 15 April touched on some longstanding faults in our electoral system, while tackling few of the major issues that need fixing.

“There are some long-running sores that seem to have been avoided by the Joint Committee in its 216-page report, after conducting 21 public hearings and receiving 216 written submissions, including four from this organisation, Australians for Honest Elections”, said AFHE President Lex Stewart.

Our website http://www.afhe.org.au/our-recommendations.html  lists in approximate priority order 9 major recommendations to overcome deficiencies in our electoral systems.  The JSCEM report has addressed only items 3 and 8 out of our 9.

AFHE President Lex Stewart says, “While we commend the JSCEM in making its recommendation 17 for identity before a person is allowed to vote in person (like the Queensland ID introduced a year ago, which the current ALP government is about to remove), the JSCEM has avoided addressing major issues” such as:-

  • the need to require identity before being put onto the Electoral Roll, i.e. the need to delete Commonwealth Electoral Act Sec 98AA (2) (c) which has been used to create thousands of false enrolments (as were used in the recent NSW State election);
  • the lack of proper ID for postal voting (this major source of rorting was used recently in Queensland inter alia to rob Pauline Hanson of a seat by a tiny margin);

(Postal voting has long been recognised as fertile ground for cheating, therefore many countries do not allow it.  UK Election Commissioner Richard Mawrey QC, who has sent people to jail from both sides of politics, horrified during his visit to Australia 4 years ago, said that ‘postal voting is a recipe for fraud … the system is highly vulnerable at a number of critical  points’;  yet his concerns have been ignored by JSCEM)

  • the need to restore Subdivisional voting – to tackle the multiple voting admitted by the AEC as having been 18,770 in the September 2013 election, yet no prosecutions were done! Nor will any be possible if the JSCEM report recommendations are used!
  • the lack of integrity in the Electoral Roll. Pages 75 to 83 of the report can only be described as ‘pathetic’, when one considers what the Australian National Audit Office reports of 2002, 2004 and 2010 said, things which were largely ignored by the AEC.

“AFHE has pointed out many issues to media and JSCEM over the last 19 months, yet they have ignored most of our concerns, based on 22 years of experience,”

“Due to the inadequacies of this JSCEM report coming out over 19 months after the 2013 election, it is plain to all who would be interested in Australia having an honest democracy, that there remain major issues not yet addressed,” said Mr Stewart.

“Whether the Government and Minister Ronaldson are capable of, or interested in, addressing these issues to have honest and fair elections remains to be seen.”

 Comments:  
For those of you new to the subject of democracy, and whether or not it exists in our country, you can see plainly that democracy is an illusion.  However, reclaiming our “democracy” is a waste of time in reality, since it is a system of Mob (majority) rule.  Now this would be fine if the majority had a strong moral code, was capable of using that thing between their ears (the brain = ability to think (analyse; decode reality) and knew the truth about history.

Unfortunately, as the majority of Australians have differing moral codes if any; the ability to think has been stolen by the dumbing down of intellect in the school system, through dangerous additives in vaccinations and poison in our food and water; and fed propaganda and lies as news, this does not behoove a good form of  democracy anyway.

The answer is the original model of the American Constitution, a Republic, where we all have inherent rights granted to us at birth, and we are all armed, with a limited and small government, where the sovereign country retains its rights to control its own money supply.

When government considers us a fiction (see the Birth Certificate/Legal Person); and gives us benefits and privileges but does not recognise our inherent rights (human rights); and when the government is controlled by corporations not the people, then we have a problem.  A BIG PROBLEM.  The stuff that civil wars are fought over, but the civil war of today is an intellectual war, an Information War.

The answer is to regain control of our education system, and control of the courts by restoring the Rule of Law:  Common Law which in reality is unobstructed Juries and Grand Juries with the power of Jury Nullification, founded upon the Magna Carta in 1215, which is 800 years old this year (2015) but has largely been repudiated by various Statutes masquerading as law.

“The people perish for lack of knowledge” (Hosea 4:6 KJB).

You can start your journey today down the rabbithole, and find out why our country is becoming more communistic and fascist year in and year out by reading Carroll Quigley’s book “Tragedy and Hope:  A History of the World in Our Time”.

And that my friends reminds me of a joke:  “What’s 5000 lawyers at the bottom of the ocean?  A:  A good start”.

 

APPEAL AGAINST MARY GENEVIEVE GAUDRON FORMER HIGH COURT JUDGE SET FOR HEARING IN SUPREME COURT SYDNEY

The public is invited to attend the Supreme Court Sydney in the hearing of Helen Underwood and Mary Genevieve Gaudron (former High Court Judge) and her sister, Kathryn Theresa Gaudron on Tuesday 25th August 2015 at 10.15am.  This is an Appeal in a Family Provision matter and promises to be interesting to say the least.  Publication of this appeal is deliberately being kept from the public in the mainstream media.

Queensland Government: An Illegal One Party Dictatorship

English: Tony Fitzgerald, Corruption Commissioner

English: Tony Fitzgerald, Corruption Commissioner (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Thank you Brisbane Times for publishing unedited the article by Tony Fitzgerald called “Power and the Inconvenience of Truth” and the article titled “Queensland Needs An Upper House” where the only two independent MP’s elected, Liz Cunningham (Member for Gladstone) and Independent member for Nicklin Peter Wellington called for the restoration of Queensland’s Upper House after they were sacked from the  Parliamentary Crime and Misconduct Committee.  Attorney-General Jarrod Bleijie prefers Crime and Misconduct acting Chair Ken Levy, a proven liar who will toe the party line.

While Tony Fitzgerald’s article was measured it still hit the mark, but let’s not mince words here, a unicameral government is a dictatorship.  It is a fact that in 1917 there was a Referendum to abolish the Upper House in Queensland which failed, yet in 1922 the Upper House was illegally removed.   QUT (Queensland University of Technology) Law School in 2012 could not and would not provide an answer on how Queensland’s Upper House was removed legally.  The lawyers/teachers should know if it was legal or not, and if they cover up the illegality, they are also an accessory-after-the-fact, and are guilty of sedition.

This is the illegality of the status quo, and the accepted illegality of the removal of the Upper House by every single sitting member of the Queensland parliament are continuing to commit a criminal offence, so that any member who sits (all of the LNP party) and does not demand a return to the original constitution of Queensland has committed sedition, the punishment of which used to call for a lynching in the town square.

However bringing back the Upper House is only part of the problem/solution.  Any discussion on Truth and Justice must address the courts modus operandi  There is absolutely no justice at all in Queensland when the courts operate in secret (family courts) and courts are serviced by one judge Star Chamber, who is often either biased, incompetent or on the take, particularly so if that judge is a freemason, or a member of some other illegal secret society (gang).

The V.L.A.D. the impaler laws (Vicious Lawless Associate Disestablishment Bill) should be applied across the defence force, the police, the judiciary and the parliament to remove and jail those who are gang members of secret societies such as Freemasons, Order of the Red Garter (Anna Bligh), Knights of Malta, Fabian Socialists (Kevin Rudd); and Jesuit Brotherhood (Quentin Bryce).  This would do a lot to clean up the system.

There have been so many blatant miscarriages of justice here in Queensland, it would take decades to right.  One of the problems is the controlled media who through influence and deep pockets can take out a political party such as One Nation and its individual politicians like Pauline Hansen.  Scott Balson was targeted for exposing the real news on the One Nation website such as the fact that Queensland had a known paedophile Bill D’Arcy still able to enact laws for Queensland while awaiting trial.  Watch Scott Balson’s story “Enemy of the State” on the state of Justice in Queensland on You Tube here (Part 1); (Part 2); (Part 3) and (Part 4).

Without unobstructed juries sitting in every court, both civil and criminal, there can be no justice.  The truth is that common law is trial by jury, and there are many excellent articles on the Democracy Defined Website that explain the term legem terrae and the power of the jury justice system, particularly the power of jury nullification.

In the United States of America a man by the name of James Baab is interviewed on WHDT9 by Gary Franchi titled “REPORT: Jury Rights Billboard Campaign Infuriates Prosecutors”.  organised enough money to be donated to run a series of billboard advertisements near the courts to tell juries of their right to jury nullification, as courts will often tell juries that they only have the power to judge the facts.  This is a lie, because the jury has the power to judge the law and the facts.  If the law is a stupid law that is not in the interests of the people, the law will be disposed of and a jury justice system would certainly void any legislation that was not in the public interest, and therefore would discourage the enactment of such legislation.

A jury justice system would also hold all public servants to account, with the power to bring charges of treason and sedition returned to the courts.  If powerful public servants are forced to act in their jobs under their own personal liability, and their own homes, vehicles and freedom was threatened, integrity would begin to return to the Queensland Government overnight.

Historic Common Law Court Prosecution concludes its Case against Canada, its churches and the Vatican

Breaking News: Thursday, January 30, 2013

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OPKFk_L7y9g

A Global Media Release and Advisory from The International Tribunal into Crimes of Church and State

“A final and lasting justice is owed to the dead and the living victims of the world’s least-known and never-prosecuted Genocide” declares ICLCJ Prosecutor

Brussels (ITCCS Central):

Canada‘s first independent judicial proceeding concluded its Prosecution’s case today against the institutions responsible for the death of more than 50,000 aboriginal children.

The International Common Law Court of Justice (ICLCJ) commenced a case on November 6, 2012 against Canada and its churches for crimes against humanity in the Indian residential school system. Today, the Prosectutor’s Office of the Court posted its complete case containing 150 exhibits and other evidence proving that Canadian church and state are guilty of intentional genocide and a criminal conspiracy against indigenous children.

The complete case is now available online at http://www.itccs.org and at this link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OPKFk_L7y9g

The Prosecution has named and subpoenaed as defendants Pope Benedict and the Vatican, the Crown and Queen of England, the Prime Minister of Canada and fiduciary officers of the Catholic, Anglican and United churches.

“Our aim is nothing less than the disestablishment of the institutions responsible for the worst Genocide in human history: the planned extermination of indigenous nations and their children on this continent” summarized ICLCJ advisor to the Prosecutor’s Office, Kevin Annett Eagle Strong Voice today.

In his summation, Annett called on the Court’s fifty eight sworn Citizen Jurors to bring in a guilty verdict against the defendants and a sentence of no less than twenty five years in prison for them and the forfeiture of their wealth.

The Prosecution also demanded the seizure of the property and assets of the named churches “as part of true reparations”, and the legal dis-establishment of the same churches.

“International law does not suffer genocidal organizations to enjoy tax exemptions, privileges and legal protection, and actually encourages citizens to shun such bodies. This Court can do no less, since we stand on the Nuremberg standards and the Rome Statute” said Annett.

The ICLCJ has given the thirty two subpoenaed defendants seven days to present their defence, or face a decision in absentia. If the defendants fail to respond, the Citizen Jurors will retire to render their verdict on the evidence.

Meanwhile, both aboriginal and non-native supporters of the Court are planning direct actions to implement the verdict, including by withholding tax payments to the government of Canada and occupying and seizing churches responsible for the deaths of native children.

One such Canadian tax-withholder, Andrew Paterson, will be interviewed on on the Court’s new global blog radio program, “We the Jury: A Forum without Borders”, which commences this Saturday, February 2 at 4 pm EST, 9 pm GMT, at http://www.blogtalkradio.com/wethejury .

Follow www.itccs.org for the Jury`s final verdict and further developments.

Issued by ITCCS Central – Belgium

30 January, 2013

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OPKFk_L7y9g

 

 

 

International Common Law Court of Justice Update

A Brief Update from Kevin Annett and The International Common Law Court of Justice – January 18, 2013.
The Court’s first case concludes, and our new global radio program begins

 

Back on “Canadian” soil now, after making some new and important connections abroad, I want to alert all of you to two upcoming events:

Friday, February 1, 2013: The final and complete case of Genocide in Canada will be presented to the world at http://www.itccs.org by the Prosecutor’s Office. In the absence of a response by the named and subpoenaed defendants, our fifty-eight Citizen Jurors will then consider the evidence and render an enforceable verdict.

Saturday, February 2: Our new global blog talk radio program “We the Jury: A Forum Without Borders” will commence and broadcast at 1 pm pacific time, 4 pm Eastern time, 9 pm GMT, at www.blogtalkradio.com/wethejury. The opening program will assess the evidence of Genocide in Canada and ask, “How should reasonable people respond to crimes by their own government and churches?”. One man’s response – of withholding his taxes from the Canadian government – will be featured.

Please share these links and their historic evidence throughout your networks. I will be commencing another global tour on behalf of our Common Law Court and the ITCCS on March 15, 2013. Stay tuned!

with my thanks,
Kevin Annett – Eagle Strong Voice

 


The Shape of Things to Come
See the evidence of Genocide in Canada and other crimes against the innocent at http://www.hiddennolonger.com and at the website of The International Tribunal into Crimes of Church and State at www.itccs.org .

Messages for Kevin Annett can be left at 250-591-4573 (Canada).

Watch Kevin’s award-winning documentary film UNREPENTANT on his website www.hiddenfromhistory.org

 

“I gave Kevin Annett his Indian name, Eagle Strong Voice, in 2004 when I adopted him into our Anishinabe Nation. He carries that name proudly because he is doing the job he was sent to do, to tell his people of their wrongs. He speaks strongly and with truth. He speaks for our stolen and murdered children. I ask everyone to listen to him and welcome him.”

 

Chief Louis Daniels – Whispers Wind
Elder, Turtle Clan, Anishinabe Nation, Winnipeg, Manitoba