QLD LABOR RAMPS UP LNP FASCIST LAWS PROVING A ONE PARTY STATE

Queensland Labor Attorney General Yvette D’Ath is proving herself to be just as unpopular with Queenslanders as Campbell Newman.  According to the Friday’s edition of the Courier Mail on 19 June 2015, “Drinkers face Random Bar Booze testing from Police”.

This cultural shift will disrupt the good old Aussie tradition of buying your mates a beer at the local bar if the police Gestapo are allowed to turn up at essentially private outings by Queenslanders, without a warrant, and demand that you blow in the bag in order to build a case for the government prosecution for the pre-crime of violence.

What about the consent of the governed?  What happens to those people who refuse to blow in the bag?  Will the government charge them with being violent in a public place, like they charge drivers for being drunk behind the wheel if they refuse to submit to a breath test?  .

Or perhaps the Labor government will charge non-violent dissenters with being drunk and disorderly?  Will they hand dissenters fines, or will the police get violent towards the non-violent dissenters, handcuff them and throw them in the watchhouse for being drunk, violent and disorderly because they refuse to submit?  Will dissenters lose their right to go out and become banned from nightclub precincts altogether if they don’t submit?  Will continual dissent see normal law-abiding citizens end up in jail for pre-crime offences?

Will licensed pubs, clubs and restaurants be placed under economic duress by becoming unwitting targets in the further fascist crackdown to control the movement and actions of otherwise law-abiding citizens?

When will the young people wake up from their slumber?  Everyone in Queensland particularly young people need to learn Jurisdictionary® so they can protect and enforce their rights in a court of law without spending a large amount of money on expensive lawyers.

 

Advertisements

Electoral Report fails to address some big Issues: Australian Democracy is an Illusion

Article by Lex Stewart
President, Australians for Honest Elections Inc.
www.afhe.org.au
With comments by R.L.F.

 ·       Does Government have the competence to fix the voting systems?
 ·       The Joint Standing Committee on Electoral Matters (JSCEM) has failed
 ·       “Vote Early, Vote Often” frauds can continue, unaffected by this report

The report of the JSCEM released on 15 April touched on some longstanding faults in our electoral system, while tackling few of the major issues that need fixing.

“There are some long-running sores that seem to have been avoided by the Joint Committee in its 216-page report, after conducting 21 public hearings and receiving 216 written submissions, including four from this organisation, Australians for Honest Elections”, said AFHE President Lex Stewart.

Our website http://www.afhe.org.au/our-recommendations.html  lists in approximate priority order 9 major recommendations to overcome deficiencies in our electoral systems.  The JSCEM report has addressed only items 3 and 8 out of our 9.

AFHE President Lex Stewart says, “While we commend the JSCEM in making its recommendation 17 for identity before a person is allowed to vote in person (like the Queensland ID introduced a year ago, which the current ALP government is about to remove), the JSCEM has avoided addressing major issues” such as:-

  • the need to require identity before being put onto the Electoral Roll, i.e. the need to delete Commonwealth Electoral Act Sec 98AA (2) (c) which has been used to create thousands of false enrolments (as were used in the recent NSW State election);
  • the lack of proper ID for postal voting (this major source of rorting was used recently in Queensland inter alia to rob Pauline Hanson of a seat by a tiny margin);

(Postal voting has long been recognised as fertile ground for cheating, therefore many countries do not allow it.  UK Election Commissioner Richard Mawrey QC, who has sent people to jail from both sides of politics, horrified during his visit to Australia 4 years ago, said that ‘postal voting is a recipe for fraud … the system is highly vulnerable at a number of critical  points’;  yet his concerns have been ignored by JSCEM)

  • the need to restore Subdivisional voting – to tackle the multiple voting admitted by the AEC as having been 18,770 in the September 2013 election, yet no prosecutions were done! Nor will any be possible if the JSCEM report recommendations are used!
  • the lack of integrity in the Electoral Roll. Pages 75 to 83 of the report can only be described as ‘pathetic’, when one considers what the Australian National Audit Office reports of 2002, 2004 and 2010 said, things which were largely ignored by the AEC.

“AFHE has pointed out many issues to media and JSCEM over the last 19 months, yet they have ignored most of our concerns, based on 22 years of experience,”

“Due to the inadequacies of this JSCEM report coming out over 19 months after the 2013 election, it is plain to all who would be interested in Australia having an honest democracy, that there remain major issues not yet addressed,” said Mr Stewart.

“Whether the Government and Minister Ronaldson are capable of, or interested in, addressing these issues to have honest and fair elections remains to be seen.”

 Comments:  
For those of you new to the subject of democracy, and whether or not it exists in our country, you can see plainly that democracy is an illusion.  However, reclaiming our “democracy” is a waste of time in reality, since it is a system of Mob (majority) rule.  Now this would be fine if the majority had a strong moral code, was capable of using that thing between their ears (the brain = ability to think (analyse; decode reality) and knew the truth about history.

Unfortunately, as the majority of Australians have differing moral codes if any; the ability to think has been stolen by the dumbing down of intellect in the school system, through dangerous additives in vaccinations and poison in our food and water; and fed propaganda and lies as news, this does not behoove a good form of  democracy anyway.

The answer is the original model of the American Constitution, a Republic, where we all have inherent rights granted to us at birth, and we are all armed, with a limited and small government, where the sovereign country retains its rights to control its own money supply.

When government considers us a fiction (see the Birth Certificate/Legal Person); and gives us benefits and privileges but does not recognise our inherent rights (human rights); and when the government is controlled by corporations not the people, then we have a problem.  A BIG PROBLEM.  The stuff that civil wars are fought over, but the civil war of today is an intellectual war, an Information War.

The answer is to regain control of our education system, and control of the courts by restoring the Rule of Law:  Common Law which in reality is unobstructed Juries and Grand Juries with the power of Jury Nullification, founded upon the Magna Carta in 1215, which is 800 years old this year (2015) but has largely been repudiated by various Statutes masquerading as law.

“The people perish for lack of knowledge” (Hosea 4:6 KJB).

You can start your journey today down the rabbithole, and find out why our country is becoming more communistic and fascist year in and year out by reading Carroll Quigley’s book “Tragedy and Hope:  A History of the World in Our Time”.

And that my friends reminds me of a joke:  “What’s 5000 lawyers at the bottom of the ocean?  A:  A good start”.

 

Queensland Government: An Illegal One Party Dictatorship

English: Tony Fitzgerald, Corruption Commissioner

English: Tony Fitzgerald, Corruption Commissioner (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Thank you Brisbane Times for publishing unedited the article by Tony Fitzgerald called “Power and the Inconvenience of Truth” and the article titled “Queensland Needs An Upper House” where the only two independent MP’s elected, Liz Cunningham (Member for Gladstone) and Independent member for Nicklin Peter Wellington called for the restoration of Queensland’s Upper House after they were sacked from the  Parliamentary Crime and Misconduct Committee.  Attorney-General Jarrod Bleijie prefers Crime and Misconduct acting Chair Ken Levy, a proven liar who will toe the party line.

While Tony Fitzgerald’s article was measured it still hit the mark, but let’s not mince words here, a unicameral government is a dictatorship.  It is a fact that in 1917 there was a Referendum to abolish the Upper House in Queensland which failed, yet in 1922 the Upper House was illegally removed.   QUT (Queensland University of Technology) Law School in 2012 could not and would not provide an answer on how Queensland’s Upper House was removed legally.  The lawyers/teachers should know if it was legal or not, and if they cover up the illegality, they are also an accessory-after-the-fact, and are guilty of sedition.

This is the illegality of the status quo, and the accepted illegality of the removal of the Upper House by every single sitting member of the Queensland parliament are continuing to commit a criminal offence, so that any member who sits (all of the LNP party) and does not demand a return to the original constitution of Queensland has committed sedition, the punishment of which used to call for a lynching in the town square.

However bringing back the Upper House is only part of the problem/solution.  Any discussion on Truth and Justice must address the courts modus operandi  There is absolutely no justice at all in Queensland when the courts operate in secret (family courts) and courts are serviced by one judge Star Chamber, who is often either biased, incompetent or on the take, particularly so if that judge is a freemason, or a member of some other illegal secret society (gang).

The V.L.A.D. the impaler laws (Vicious Lawless Associate Disestablishment Bill) should be applied across the defence force, the police, the judiciary and the parliament to remove and jail those who are gang members of secret societies such as Freemasons, Order of the Red Garter (Anna Bligh), Knights of Malta, Fabian Socialists (Kevin Rudd); and Jesuit Brotherhood (Quentin Bryce).  This would do a lot to clean up the system.

There have been so many blatant miscarriages of justice here in Queensland, it would take decades to right.  One of the problems is the controlled media who through influence and deep pockets can take out a political party such as One Nation and its individual politicians like Pauline Hansen.  Scott Balson was targeted for exposing the real news on the One Nation website such as the fact that Queensland had a known paedophile Bill D’Arcy still able to enact laws for Queensland while awaiting trial.  Watch Scott Balson’s story “Enemy of the State” on the state of Justice in Queensland on You Tube here (Part 1); (Part 2); (Part 3) and (Part 4).

Without unobstructed juries sitting in every court, both civil and criminal, there can be no justice.  The truth is that common law is trial by jury, and there are many excellent articles on the Democracy Defined Website that explain the term legem terrae and the power of the jury justice system, particularly the power of jury nullification.

In the United States of America a man by the name of James Baab is interviewed on WHDT9 by Gary Franchi titled “REPORT: Jury Rights Billboard Campaign Infuriates Prosecutors”.  organised enough money to be donated to run a series of billboard advertisements near the courts to tell juries of their right to jury nullification, as courts will often tell juries that they only have the power to judge the facts.  This is a lie, because the jury has the power to judge the law and the facts.  If the law is a stupid law that is not in the interests of the people, the law will be disposed of and a jury justice system would certainly void any legislation that was not in the public interest, and therefore would discourage the enactment of such legislation.

A jury justice system would also hold all public servants to account, with the power to bring charges of treason and sedition returned to the courts.  If powerful public servants are forced to act in their jobs under their own personal liability, and their own homes, vehicles and freedom was threatened, integrity would begin to return to the Queensland Government overnight.

Historic Common Law Court Prosecution concludes its Case against Canada, its churches and the Vatican

Breaking News: Thursday, January 30, 2013

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OPKFk_L7y9g

A Global Media Release and Advisory from The International Tribunal into Crimes of Church and State

“A final and lasting justice is owed to the dead and the living victims of the world’s least-known and never-prosecuted Genocide” declares ICLCJ Prosecutor

Brussels (ITCCS Central):

Canada‘s first independent judicial proceeding concluded its Prosecution’s case today against the institutions responsible for the death of more than 50,000 aboriginal children.

The International Common Law Court of Justice (ICLCJ) commenced a case on November 6, 2012 against Canada and its churches for crimes against humanity in the Indian residential school system. Today, the Prosectutor’s Office of the Court posted its complete case containing 150 exhibits and other evidence proving that Canadian church and state are guilty of intentional genocide and a criminal conspiracy against indigenous children.

The complete case is now available online at http://www.itccs.org and at this link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OPKFk_L7y9g

The Prosecution has named and subpoenaed as defendants Pope Benedict and the Vatican, the Crown and Queen of England, the Prime Minister of Canada and fiduciary officers of the Catholic, Anglican and United churches.

“Our aim is nothing less than the disestablishment of the institutions responsible for the worst Genocide in human history: the planned extermination of indigenous nations and their children on this continent” summarized ICLCJ advisor to the Prosecutor’s Office, Kevin Annett Eagle Strong Voice today.

In his summation, Annett called on the Court’s fifty eight sworn Citizen Jurors to bring in a guilty verdict against the defendants and a sentence of no less than twenty five years in prison for them and the forfeiture of their wealth.

The Prosecution also demanded the seizure of the property and assets of the named churches “as part of true reparations”, and the legal dis-establishment of the same churches.

“International law does not suffer genocidal organizations to enjoy tax exemptions, privileges and legal protection, and actually encourages citizens to shun such bodies. This Court can do no less, since we stand on the Nuremberg standards and the Rome Statute” said Annett.

The ICLCJ has given the thirty two subpoenaed defendants seven days to present their defence, or face a decision in absentia. If the defendants fail to respond, the Citizen Jurors will retire to render their verdict on the evidence.

Meanwhile, both aboriginal and non-native supporters of the Court are planning direct actions to implement the verdict, including by withholding tax payments to the government of Canada and occupying and seizing churches responsible for the deaths of native children.

One such Canadian tax-withholder, Andrew Paterson, will be interviewed on on the Court’s new global blog radio program, “We the Jury: A Forum without Borders”, which commences this Saturday, February 2 at 4 pm EST, 9 pm GMT, at http://www.blogtalkradio.com/wethejury .

Follow www.itccs.org for the Jury`s final verdict and further developments.

Issued by ITCCS Central – Belgium

30 January, 2013

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OPKFk_L7y9g

 

 

 

International Common Law Court of Justice Update

A Brief Update from Kevin Annett and The International Common Law Court of Justice – January 18, 2013.
The Court’s first case concludes, and our new global radio program begins

 

Back on “Canadian” soil now, after making some new and important connections abroad, I want to alert all of you to two upcoming events:

Friday, February 1, 2013: The final and complete case of Genocide in Canada will be presented to the world at http://www.itccs.org by the Prosecutor’s Office. In the absence of a response by the named and subpoenaed defendants, our fifty-eight Citizen Jurors will then consider the evidence and render an enforceable verdict.

Saturday, February 2: Our new global blog talk radio program “We the Jury: A Forum Without Borders” will commence and broadcast at 1 pm pacific time, 4 pm Eastern time, 9 pm GMT, at www.blogtalkradio.com/wethejury. The opening program will assess the evidence of Genocide in Canada and ask, “How should reasonable people respond to crimes by their own government and churches?”. One man’s response – of withholding his taxes from the Canadian government – will be featured.

Please share these links and their historic evidence throughout your networks. I will be commencing another global tour on behalf of our Common Law Court and the ITCCS on March 15, 2013. Stay tuned!

with my thanks,
Kevin Annett – Eagle Strong Voice

 


The Shape of Things to Come
See the evidence of Genocide in Canada and other crimes against the innocent at http://www.hiddennolonger.com and at the website of The International Tribunal into Crimes of Church and State at www.itccs.org .

Messages for Kevin Annett can be left at 250-591-4573 (Canada).

Watch Kevin’s award-winning documentary film UNREPENTANT on his website www.hiddenfromhistory.org

 

“I gave Kevin Annett his Indian name, Eagle Strong Voice, in 2004 when I adopted him into our Anishinabe Nation. He carries that name proudly because he is doing the job he was sent to do, to tell his people of their wrongs. He speaks strongly and with truth. He speaks for our stolen and murdered children. I ask everyone to listen to him and welcome him.”

 

Chief Louis Daniels – Whispers Wind
Elder, Turtle Clan, Anishinabe Nation, Winnipeg, Manitoba

 

 

 

Convening of The International Common Law Court of Justice

Convening of The International Common Law Court of Justice
October 15, 2012
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hr3lpMA58EE

Former U.S. President George W. Bush, former M...

Former U.S. President George W. Bush, former Mexican President Vicente Fox and Stephen Harper, right, at the Chichen-Itza archaeological ruins in 2006 (Photo credit: Wikipedia)Hello. My name is Kevin Annett – Eagle Strong Voice, and I am the chief consultant for the Prosecutor’s Office of the International Common Law Court of Justice.

Today is Monday, October 15, 2012, and marks the formal online convening of the five sworn judges of our Court, from Canada, the United States and Belgium. They are joined by fifty eight sworn citizen jurors from Canada, the USA, Ireland, England, Holland, Italy and Australia, who have been prepared to receive the evidence in the first of five cases in the Docket of our Court.

This first case involves the evidence that the government and churches of Canada entered into a criminal conspiracy to commit genocide and other crimes against indigenous people and their children for over a century; and that such crimes were committed by the defendants and their organizations, and continue today.

Thirty two officers of church and state have been issued Public Summonses by our Court to reply to these charges, and only one of them, John Milloy, has replied. Neither Mr. Milloy nor any of the other summoned parties have contested or denied the charges made against them, including Pope Benedict, Queen Elizabeth and Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper. Our Prosecutor’s Office has therefore filed a motion with the Court that a guilty plea be entered on behalf of all of the defendants named in our Summonses, in their absence, since they do not contest or deny the charges made against them.

The aim of our Prosecutor`s Office is to achieve a final verdict of guilty against all of the persons and organizations named in our Public Summons of September 21, which is posted online at http://www.itccs.org .

For the record, our Office will demand the strongest sentences against these parties, including extensive prison terms, the expropriation of their property and assets, the citizens’ arrest of their accomplices and others engaged in these ongoing crimes, the occupation and seizure of catholic and protestant church property, and the legal and practical dis-establishment of the criminal church bodies named in the main indictment. These sentences will be duly enforced by our own sworn Common Law Peace Officers and regular law enforcement officers deputized by our Court.

The defendants will not buy their way out of responsibility for the deaths of children and these other crimes against humanity, as they have up until now. Nor will they and their organizations be allowed to terrorize the innocent any longer.

The volume of evidence gathered against the defendants is considerable, comprising nearly two hundred exhibits that will be presented as primary evidence by our Prosecutor`s office in the course of our argument. For this reason, it is necessary to present the evidence as a single package, and not in piecemeal form, so that the citizen jurors and the public can receive the most accurate and truthful presentation of the evidence of genocide in Canada.

Accordingly, and for the sake of the judicial and historical record, it has been decided by the Court’s Panel of Judges to allow our Prosecutor’s Office until Thursday, November 1 at 5 pm Greenwich Mean Time to compile all of our exhibits and evidence in a condensed, viewable form, and to commence their complete presentation to the Court at that day and hour. This presentation will be posted that same day on You Tube, google video and http://www.itccs.org .

I am therefore authorized to announce that the Prosecutor’s Office of the International Common Law Court of Justice will commence our opening argument and presentation in the first case in our Docket, The People and Kevin Annett v. the officers of the government of Canada, the crown of England, the Vatican and other church corporations, on Thursday, November 1, 2012 at 9 am pacific time, 12 noon central, and 5 pm Greenwich mean time.

The duly sworn citizen jurors will hold themselves ready to convene on that day and hour. And you, the public, are invited to join us that day and view the online evidence in this historic court of justice.

Thank you
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hr3lpMA58EE
See the evidence of Genocide in Canada and other crimes against the innocent at
www.hiddennolonger.com and at the website of The International Tribunal into Crimes of Church and State at www.itccs.org .

Messages for Kevin Annett can be left at 250-591-4573 (Canada).  Watch Kevin’s award-winning documentary film UNREPENTANT on his website www.hiddenfromhistory.org

“I gave Kevin Annett his Indian name, Eagle Strong Voice, in 2004 when I adopted him into our Anishinabe Nation. He carries that name proudly because he is doing the job he was sent to do, to tell his people of their wrongs. He speaks strongly and with truth. He speaks for our stolen and murdered children. I ask everyone to listen to him and welcome him.”

Chief Louis Daniels – Whispers Wind
Elder, Turtle Clan, Anishinabe Nation, Winnipeg, Manitoba

The International Common Law Court of Justice

Royal Courts Of Justice - The Strand - London

Royal Courts Of Justice – The Strand – London (Photo credit: nick.garrod)

The International Common Law Court of Justice
(Affiliated with The International Tribunal into Crimes of Church and State)
Convened 15 September, 2012

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yl0GCZQ2ThE

Hello and welcome. My name is Kevin Annett Eagle Strong Voice and I am speaking to you today on behalf of the Council of Elders of the International Tribunal into Crimes of Church and State: a multinational coalition of over fifteen organizations in seven countries.

Under the authority of that Tribunal as well as Common Law and the Natural Land Law Jurisdiction of Sovereign Nations, I declare that as of this day, Saturday, September 15, 2012, a Public International Court of Justice is hereby convened to consider evidence related to charges of crimes against humanity and criminal conspiracy by institutions of church and state, and their fiduciary officers.

The crimes that will be documented and judged in our Court are abominable and almost unimaginable. They span centuries, and range from outright murder to systematic torture, rape, slave labor, germ warfare, medical experimentation, drug testing, involuntary sterilizations, child trafficking, genocide and wars of extermination against peaceful nations. These crimes are all the more heinous by the fact that they were often aimed at children and occured not randomly by isolated individuals, but historically, systematically, deliberately, and officially, by express command of heads of church and state according to their laws and customs – and by the fact that many of these crimes carry on today against the innocent at the hands of the same authorizing institutions and heads of state.

The enormity of these crimes requires a new approach. For this Court is a unique experiment, in that under existing international law, institutions cannot be brought to trial or account for genocidal or criminal actions, despite the fact that these crimes arise from and are caused by such institutions. There has consequently been no legal recourse for millions of people whose cultures and lives have been destroyed by the deliberate plans and actions of institutions of church and state, such as in the case of the conquest of entire continents of non-Christian people by European kingdoms operating under the sanction of so-called papal laws.

Similarly, in the case of countless victims of sexual assault and torture by clergy of catholic and protestant churches, national courts have continually denied these victims the right to sue these churches as a whole and restricted their litigation to individual perpetrators, despite the fact that church laws and policies allow, protect and legitimate such assaults.

These very restrictions require not only an entirely new legal approach to the historic wrongs of church and state, if justice is to be done and seen to be done; but the fact that existing courts refuse to address the root cause of these crimes by naming the systems respoinsible for them compels the citizens of all nations to rely on their customary and unalienable rights to win justice and protect themselves and their children when existing authorities refuse to do so.

It is in this spirit that our International Common Law Court of Justice is convened.

Our Court stands upon the precedent of the Nuremburg Laws and the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, which state clearly that citizens everywhere have the right and obligation to refuse to obey or pay taxes to governments or institutions engaged in crimes against humanity. That is, it is recognized by international law that institutions as well as individuals can be engaged in criminal actions and can therefore be held accountable and liable in a court of law.

The purpose of our Common Law Court is to do precisely that. Our Court has standing under not only the customary right of citizens to pursue justice and defend their communities, but by our relationship with the courts of various nations that claim universal jurisdiction over human rights cases. The evidence presented before our Court will also be filed in these national courts that do not operate under the authority or legal systems of the various powers we will be naming as defendants, such as the so-called Crown of England and its Admiralty laws, or the Vatican and its so-called Canon laws.

Our Court will be pursuing this course in order to render an enforceable verdict against churches and states responsible for the heinous crimes that we will document to the world. Our Court is not a symbolic gesture but a legitimate legal procedure that will seek the indictment and imprisonment of guilty parties, the restoration of stolen land, lives and wealth, and the abolition of institutions responsible for ongoing crimes against humanity.

With all this in mind, let me begin by explaining the procedure and protocols of our Common Law Court, and our timetable in the weeks ahead.

Today’s session is part of a normal pre-trial process, in which the terms of the trial are established, the cases and parties to the action are named, and a Public Summons is issued by the Prosecutor’s Office to the named defendants. These defendants will be given ten working days – until October 1, 2012 – to respond in writing to the Summons and agree to a Pre-trial Conference (often called Voir Dire or Examination for Discovery) in which evidence can be shared and pleadings heard. If the defendants refuse to respond, their silence can be deemed to mean they do not contest the charges made against them, and is often interpreted as a tacit admission of guilt. In this case, our Court will proceed with the Prosecution’s case against the Defendants in absentia and the formal trial will begin.

This legal process will be overseen by a Panel of five sworn judges, an Office of Citizen Prosecutors, and a common law jury of fifty eight Citizen Jurors based in Canada, the United States, Ireland, England, the Netherlands, Italy, and Australia. All of these participants have as of today been duly sworn and have taken an oath of confidentiality and service. For reasons of security and due process, the identity of these judges and jurors will remain confidential until the day the final verdict of the Court is pronounced, and the court officers are discharged.

Today, September 15, a Public Summons is being issued to all of the parties and institutions named in the five cases being presented by our Court. These parties will have until midnight Greenwich mean time on Monday, October 1, 2012 to respond to the charges and agree to a Pre-trial Conference date. After October 1, either that Conference or the trial itself will proceed, if necessary in absentia.

These events as they occur will be posted the same day on our tribunal’s website, http://www.itccs.org .

Now, in conclusion, allow me to present to all of you the five cases being brought to trial by our Prosecutor’s Office: cases which summarize the main evidence gathered to prove beyond any reasonable doubt that the churches, governments and individuals named as defendants are guilty and indictable for crimes against humanity and a monstrous criminal conspiracy.

Our first case, in the Matter of Kevin Annett and the People v. the Government of Canada, the United Church of Canada, the Roman Catholic Church, and the Anglican Church in Canada, and the officers of these churches, the Crown of England and its officers, the Assembly of First Nations and its officers, the Weyerhauser logging company and its orfficers, the RCMP “E” Division and its officers, and the Law Society of British Columbia and its officers. The Plaintiffs Kevin Annett and the People claim that the defendants are associated with a centuries-old criminal conspiracy and crime against humanity authorized by church laws to conquer, enslave, terrorize and permanently eradicate non-Christian nations and indigenous peoples, and to deprive these peoples of their identity, livelihood, lands and resources; and that the same defendants have actively used and are using the medium of their religion and so-called Indian residential schools to accomplish this conquest and other crimes which fit the definition of genocide under international law.

The Plaintiffs further claim that these crimes have caused the death of at least 50,000 children in the residential schools alone, and many hundreds of thousands of other native people and their offspring.

The Plaintiffs further claim that these crimes continue to the present day and involve the deliberate targeting and extermination of indigenous families, children, and land based communities across Canada; and that these crimes are aided and abetted by officials of the Crown and private corporations, as well as the media, church officials, the RCMP, the courts and legal community, and their agents.

The Plaintiffs further claim that this plan to eradicate native familes is deliberately aimed at traditional female elders and their lineage, and involves operating child trafficking and pedophile-sex slavery networks, the murder of native women and children, “snuff” films and other criminal acts.

The Plaintiffs further claim that the defendants are actively concealing these crimes and their complicity in them through a sustained campaign of historical falsification, misinformation, lies, destruction of evidence and eyewitnesses, obstruction of justice, and other methods of dissumulation and fraud.

The Plaintiff Kevin Annett further claims that the defendants did knowingly and with malicious intent enter into an ongoing criminal conspiracy to intentionally assault and destroy his livelihood, employability, good name and family in order to conceal evidence of all of these crimes and especially of their theft and profiting off of land of the Ahousaht Nation, their defrauding of the public, and their collusion in genocide, rape and murder of generations of indigenous children across Canada in their so-called Indian residential schools and Indian hospitals.

In our second case, in the Matter of the People v. the Government of Canada, the Roman Catholic Church, the Anglican Church in Canada and the United Church of Canada, and the officers of these institutions.

The Plaintiffs claim that the government and named churches of Canada are deliberately obstructing and subverting justice, defrauding the public, and concealing their own crimes against humanity by establishing a self-regulated, restricted inquiry into Indian residential schools named the “truth and reconciliation commission” that has neither the mandate nor the legal power to conduct a competent and legally effective investigation.

The Plantiffs further claim that these named organizations and persons are deliberately concealing, destroying and subverting evidence of their own crimes in these schools, silencing eyewitnesses, denying the latter due process and civil liberties, and are re-traumatizing the latter with intent to destroy them.

In our third case, in the Matter of the People v. the Crown of England and the New England Company, the Anglican Church of Canada, the government of Canada, and the Six Nations Confederacy and its officers.

The Plaintiffs claim that the defendants are responsible for the intentional, planned extermination of generations of native children at the Mohawk Indian residential school in Brantford, Ontario, and for the deliberate and ongoing concealment and destruction of evidence, documentation, burial sites and human remains at this school and elsewhere.

The Plaintiffs further claim that these parties actively conspired and planned ways to destroy the Mohawk Nation in its entirety through the medium of the same Mohawk Indian school by way of a formal agreement signed between these parties in 1870.

In the fourth case in our Docket , in the Matter of the People and Victoria Stewart v. The United Church of Canada and its officers, the RCMP and its officers, the Estate of Ann Knizky, the government of Canada and its officers.

The Plaintiffs claim that the defendants killed and aided and abetted in the killing of Victoria Stewart, age 9, at the United Church Indian residential school in Edmonton, Alberta, on April 9, 1958.

The Plaintiffs further claim that the defendants concealed this murder by falsifying records, removing body organs of the deceased, silencing eyewitnesses to the killing and issuing a false and fraudulent account of her death; and that this concealment and obstruction of justice continues.

And in the fifth case in our Docket, in the Matter of the People v. the Vatican and its chief executive officers.

The Plaintiffs claim that the defendants are part of a deliberate international criminal conspiracy and crime against humanity to aid and abett organized child rape, torture and trafficking within the Roman Catholic Church, using their position to protect and maintain such crimes.

The Plaintiffs further claim that the defendants are actively obstructing justice in Italy and internationally according to a Vatican canon law policy known as Crimen Sollicitationis, which is binding on all Catholic clergy, and which compels them to engage in the same criminal conspiracy by protecting and aiding child rapsists within the Catholic church and concealing these criminals from police and legal authorities.

The evidence regarding these five cases will be presented by our Prosecutor’s Office commencing October 1, in the absence of a pre-trial conference. That evidence will be posted and available on line in the course of the trial, as well as being submitted to the fifty eight sworn Citizen Jurors who will be charged with rendering a final verdict. The world in effect will be in the court room to hear and consider this evidence of some of the worst crimes against humanity in history, and to come to its own consensus about what must be done to end forever the reigh of terror of criminal institutions in our midst.

In the meantime, please read the background to these cases and some of the evidence being presented at the website: http://www.hiddennolonger.com

Again, you can follow the progress of our court at http://www.itccs.org . Our next broadcast will occur on October 2, 2012. Thank you, and may we close by saying: Let justice be done though the heavens may fall.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yl0GCZQ2ThE

See the evidence of Genocide in Canada and other crimes against the innocent at http://www.hiddennolonger.com and at the website of The International Tribunal into Crimes of Church and State at http://www.itccs.org .

Messages for Kevin Annett can be left at 250-591-4573 (Canada).

Watch Kevin’s award-winning documentary film UNREPENTANT on his website www.hiddenfromhistory.org

“I gave Kevin Annett his Indian name, Eagle Strong Voice, in 2004 when I adopted him into our Anishinabe Nation. He carries that name proudly because he is doing the job he was sent to do, to tell his people of their wrongs. He speaks strongly and with truth. He speaks for our stolen and murdered children. I ask everyone to listen to him and welcome him.”

Chief Louis Daniels – Whispers Wind

Elder, Turtle Clan, Anishinabe Nation, Winnipeg, Manitoba

See the evidence of Genocide in Canada and other crimes against the innocent at http://www.hiddennolonger.com and at the website of The International Tribunal into Crimes of Church and State at http://www.itccs.org .

Messages for Kevin Annett can be left at 250-591-4573 (Canada).

Watch Kevin’s award-winning documentary film UNREPENTANT on his website www.hiddenfromhistory.org

“I gave Kevin Annett his Indian name, Eagle Strong Voice, in 2004 when I adopted him into our Anishinabe Nation. He carries that name proudly because he is doing the job he was sent to do, to tell his people of their wrongs. He speaks strongly and with truth. He speaks for our stolen and murdered children. I ask everyone to listen to him and welcome him.”

Chief Louis Daniels – Whispers Wind

Elder, Turtle Clan, Anishinabe Nation, Winnipeg, Manitoba