MARY GAUDRON FUNDRAISING 101: CORRUPTION AND BIAS EXPOSED IN FAILED FAMILY PROVISION COURT CASE

Court of Appeal, Supreme Court, New South Wales
Underwood v Gaudron [2015] NSWCA 269
heard by Basten JA; Macfarlan JA; and Ward JA\

1.  Bias in the Media
I wrote to Louise Hall recently, a journalist known as a “Court Reporter” with the Sydney Morning Herald, on behalf of Helen Underwood (Mary Genevieve Gaudron’s and Kathryn Teresa Gaudron’s sister). I alerted Louise Hall about the outcome of the Appeal, because when Helen learned she had lost her case for a Family Provision, she was too upset to reply, especially because Hall had refused to acknowledge Helen’s previous emails.  Louise Hall had curtly emailed Helen to ask her about the outcome of her Appeal as she couldn’t be bothered to attend either the hearing or handing down of the judgment.

I also alerted Louise Hall in this initial email to my previous post that said her reporting was “… a blight on the moral landscape” because instead of unbiased reporting, press-titute Louise Hall covered the story about the initial trial, favouring Mary Gaudron, the former High Court Judge.

Helen knew that the Fairfax media machine would continue to lie about the Appeal and that the Sydney Morning Herald would not report on the case, or if it did, it would be a short notice of the outcome only.  There would have been no in-depth research to report the facts of the matter.  According to George Orwell’s famous book “1984”, the omission is the worst type of lie.

As you would expect any bought and paid for press-titute for the Fairfax boys would laud Mary Gaudron’s glorious attributes to the Australian people in order to perpetuate the myth that Australian’s courts are fair and equitable and we live according to the rule of law, when in practice the opposite is true.  Australia is in fact a lawless country whose Constitution was never ratified, and is apparently for sale to the highest bidder.

After Louise Hall announced the dismissal of the appeal on her twitter post, I posted a reply that dared her to write an article on the court case without bias and from a moral standpoint, specifically addressing the question of where is equity and remedy.  I doubt Louise Hall knows the meaning of the words, let alone be capable of writing a essay that would pass the litmus test, a crucial and revealing test in which there is one decisive factor.  If she did have any morals, BIG Brother (the cabal who run the media) would not stand for taking out one of their own, unless of course it was in their own best interests to do so.

Unfortunately for Louise Hall, she has missed out on the chance to break the story, but as many of us are waking up to, the press is no longer independent and unbiased.  Unfortunately the job of educating the public is left to unpaid educators like me to tell the story.

2.  Three Disturbing Factors
As all press-titutes do when giving a favourable head-job to their slave masters; Louise Hall ignored three disturbing factors. The first being that the subject of bias in hearing the case for Family Provision cannot be avoided; the second was that Helen was poor, and thirdly that she was morally due her share of the estate.

3.  Questions That Need Answering
Of the four children, Helen is the only one to not receive a cent, and the one that the court has heaped the costs onto. What did Helen do to deserve the ire from her family?  Helen’s affidavits have asserted blame onto her conniving and cunning sister Mary.  Regardless, we must ask why the Mother’s Will was changed from leaving the estate to all four children to only Mary and Kathryn towards the end of her life.

Another important question that needs to be answered was what provision had the father made for the children especially considering his death predated the mother’s death, and that at the time of his death, divorce proceedings were underway.

The final outcome of the Trial and Appeal were especially strange considering Brother Paul suffered a severe disability due to a childhood accident.  Wouldn’t both or at least one of the parents want to leave a sizeable sum to Brother Paul to cover future employment problems and health care?

The most important question of all is why didn’t the Trial Court and Court of Appeal take these questions into consideration when making their decision?  Although Brother Paul was only named as an interested party in these proceedings, the facts surrounding his role within the family structure certainly clarify Helen’s assertions in her Affidavits.

4.  A Small Estate
Helen is by no means a greedy woman. She would have only received a comparatively small sum from the estate, but to her this small sum would have meant so much more.  It would mean a new life in private accommodation giving her a new start.  She could afford to buy some shoes and some nice clothes, some medical care, a car, update her computer, or even buy a caravan and travel the country.

However it wasn’t the money that motivated Helen to pursue her share of the small estate.  It was the principal of the matter that was the driving factor.  Due to the dysfunctional family relationships, she had an axe to grind and wanted to confront Mary about her behaviour towards herself and her brother.  According to Helen’s affidavits she has known Mary as a serial liar, beginning her quest for fame and glory by using her mother’s favour to get what she wanted, to the exclusion and detriment of her siblings.  Kathryn was known for taking sides that were the most beneficial for her.

As you will see, there are good reasons why Mary Gaudron does not like to dwell on the past and doesn’t like bad press, as reported in Pamela Burton’s unauthorised biography.

5.  A David and Goliath Battle
Helen Underwood, the little sister of Mary Gaudron is the epitome of the mythical David, the underdog. In legal terms Helen’s economic status is known as impecunious, meaning she is seriously disadvantaged.  Helen survives on a small pension and carer’s allowance for her much older ex-husband of $450 per week.  She was self-represented, is not a lawyer although she partially completed her law degree and is self-taught, being a forensic accountant by trade.  To make matters worse she had to travel from Brisbane to Sydney in New South Wales to conduct the lawsuit.

On top of that she had no immediate access to legal representation or legal aid, no immediate access to precedents in NSW using Austlii, having only her own research skills to depend on. To top that off, she was simultaneously confronted on a daily basis with the possibility of an eviction from her housing commission unit because she dared complain about the poor sanitation; having faeces (not hers) flood her unit because the Government failed to address the plumbing problems in the unit block.  She is still facing a possible eviction due to the three strikes and you’re out policy of the Queensland government.

In direct contrast Mary Gaudron is Goliath of a figure in legal circles and the history of Australia.  She receives a judicial pension of $6,000 per week plus entitlements which equates to over $312,000 annually.  We should all feel sorry for the former High Court Judge (she who cannot be named) who obviously cannot manage on her judicial pension and her property portfolio (Struggle Street, I think not!).

She owns the townhouse at Lilyfield, an inner Sydney Suburb valued at $900,000 plus; a Beach House property at Greater Mackeral Beach in Northern Sydney on the Newport peninsula with a minimum value of $750,000; two properties in the Loire Valley, France (no value disclosed), all the while being Director of Hefano Pty Ltd which owns/manages fifteen (15) units in Newtown, a unit at Elizabeth Bay, both inner Sydney Suburbs, up to here admitted to.  Her first husband just died.  A Google Search shows Juan Investments Pty Ltd owns/manages units, the number not known with a possible location in Neutral Bay, Newtown.  The net yearly property income for a singular person as employee is some $315,000 (also $6,000 per week).

That means the former High Court Judge, now retired, is on a weekly income somewhere in the vicinity of between $6000 and $12,000 per week.  That’s up to a whopping $624,000 per year.

To top it all off, the subject of bias cannot be avoided due to her sister’s special status in the legal community, being a former High Court judge, and being senior to the judges sitting in the Supreme Court of Appeal.  Mary Gaudron was a specialist expert in the field of succession law and family provision law, receiving the Sydney University Medal for Succession Law.

While Mary Gaudron is a protected species, having easy access to case precedents, and open access to corruption at its worst, Helen was resigned to use the light of truth, often calling on her strong belief in Archangel Michael to help see her through difficult times.  Helen said that the ordeal of the trial and appeal was a “… pressure cooker from start to finish … the sheer severity and serious disadvantage was hell”.

6.  The Two Page Will
The two page Will generated a 105 page judgement from the initial trial with a transcript of 129 pages, while the Appeal totalled 39 pages of transcript, with all submissions ignored, generating a Dismissal Judgement of just 37 pages. This alone makes one wonder how a two page Will could generate such a long judgement yet be so glibly dismissed on Appeal.  It doesn’t make sense for reasons that will be explored in further detail below.

7.  The Trial
Helen was prepared to run the case on her own, however the trial judge recommended Helen have legal representation, and the barrister assigned for her on a No Win No Fee basis was Therese Catanzariti. This is where Helen’s problems started.  Therese Catanzariti was incompetent and was infatuated by the Defendant, Mary Gaudron.

Barrister Therese Catanzariti failed to object to the Judge’s decision not to record a transcript; failed to read into evidence an important affidavit, and wouldn’t listen to her client’s directions.  Helen accused her of being unable to comprehend the English language.

8.  The Appeal
Helen found out that Ruth McColl was the original judge set down to hear the Appeal along with Basten J. and McFarlan J., however Ward J. was substituted for McColl J. at the last minute. Helen had previously found out, after speaking to a lawyer friend that McColl was ruthless, and that Basten J. was being put in the same position as Dyson Heydon, having to make a decision on his own previous decision, and that McFarlan J. was the thorough gentleman.

After doing some research on the internet, Helen found that McColl J. Had said this on Mary’s Wikipedia page:  “Former President of the New South Wales Bar, Ruth McColl, described Gaudron’s contribution to Australian law as “an extraordinarily humanising effect… the strong views she expresses in cases involving discrimination and like issues, are very influential and important in the development of the law in those areas.”  Helen immediately rang Karla in the Registry and told them she wasn’t happy with McColl J. and warned Registry that she would immediately put McColl on Notice. 

During the Appeal, the problems in the Lower Court were to be exasperated by the lack of acknowledgment of ‘apprehended’ bias that is the ‘appearance of’ not the ‘actuality of’ bias, whereby Helen was required to prove actual bias.  There was also a presumption of infallibility.

Whenever the name on the document “Mary Genevieve Gaudron” was viewed it would instantly summon an apprehension of bias by any hypothetical observer.  The trial judge’s instruction to court reporters to only record the orders on the day and not a transcript, therefore did not record the actual details before the court and the fact that an important affidavit was not read into evidence was evidence of protecting another Judge.  Helen also valiantly tried to get evidence admitted into the Appeal that was not in evidence at the time of the trial.

During the Appeal, the penny seemingly dropped for Ward J. that there were four different versions of the same Will, however they sought to trap Helen by putting incorrect words in her mouth.  The decision was initially reserved.

9.  Proof the Appeal Was Pre-Judged
Helen was so glad to have received what appeared like a fair trial; however a lawyer friend said to her that the appearance of a fair trial is a misnomer because “if they were inclined to not allow your appeal, it explains why you got such a good hearing. They often do that, if you are going to go down”.

Further the Judgement in favour of a Dismissal did not refer to the nineteen Acts and Rules Helen was referring to.  She used the case of Collette and Knox [2010] QSC 132 (unrep) McMeekin J, an unreported case in Queensland which does not appear in the references in the Judgement.  This is an extremely important case as it has become known as the “Collette Principal”, including Barrister Treston’s writings on “Succession: Emerging Issues”. The mere fact that these cases were not included in the references of the Dismissal of the Appeal proves the decision was written prior to the Appeal being heard.

10.  Criticism of Mary Gaudron on Wikipedia Backs up Helen and Paul’s Affidavits
Wikipedia states that at the time of her appointment to the High Court in 1987, the New South Wales legal magazine Justinian (magazine)published anonymous remarks saying that “a melancholy catalogue of sins of omission and commission … ” ought to have weighed against her appointment, and that she held “an emotional disposition inappropriate in a holder of judicial office.” When Gaudron announced her retirement, an anonymous academic said that … among the other High Court Justices, Gaudron was “erratic” and “certainly not among the court’s greats.” Another anonymous academic said that Gaudron’s Labor connections had delivered unearned promotion.

11.  Intention, Corruption and Bias
Gaudron hates her own sister so much Helen alleges she has had to resort to forgery, misappropriation, misrepresentation and maladministration to ensure that Helen was left destitute. Mary Gaudron took money from the estate for her own purposes in order to pay a private arrangement between herself and her brother Paul resulting from their father’s death in 1982.  Mary Gaudron loves her brother so much she tricked him into signing a form that stopped him from seeking any further monies from the estate.

Gaudron was so used to lying about her sister, she stooped lower than low by committing perjury, deception and misleading the Supreme Court NSW to pervert the course of justice and everything in-between to ensure her sister did not receive any money or property or even a memento whatsoever.  Gaudron hid their mother’s death intentionally and Helen was never to find out in time.  The family joined in by keeping the death hidden from Helen.  Gaudron resorted to the full length breadth and depths of legal mis-conduct (professional and unconscionable) in order to not notify Helen who was an interested litigant.  This barely “allowable” method of conduct would only have been known to her being a specialist expert in Succession Law and Family Provision Law,

Gaudron has relied on access to corruption at its worst.  She could not face loss of her public standing on merit and has to be the protected species by buddies in the judiciary.  Whatever happened to their judicial oath?

12.  Brother Paul Exposes Mary’s True Nature
Brother Paul’s Affidavit corroborates Helen’s contention that her sisters and extended family purposely kept the death of her mother from her. Mary’s true colours were exposed when Paul lost his leg in an accident as a young boy; his father advised him that he and his late mother did not seek compensation for his accident on advice from his sister Mary and her university lecturers.   At the same time Paul’s father promised that he would leave him the house and all his property, as his way of providing Paul with some form of compensation for the accident.  Not only did Mary prevent Paul from receiving any form of compensation to go towards medical expenses, she thought it fitting that $80,000, a mere fraction of her annual salary, was sufficient for his future medical expenses and care.

13.  Explosive Family Secret of Aboriginality Revealed
There were some explosive family secrets revealed such as her brother Paul, DNA tested, proved his aboriginality, and therefore there is a strong probability that Mary, Kathryn and Helen are also aboriginal. Paul admitted his aboriginality in an affidavit, stating that his many medical expenses are paid to him through the Australian Government Closing the Gap (CTG) programme.  This revelation has many contentious implications for the Mabo hearings.  Mary Gaudron’s biography would be inaccurate if it did not also record that she was also the first aboriginal to be appointed to the High Court.

In Helen’s Affidavit she stated “In the event the death or incapacity of one or both defendants prior to the conclusion of these proceedings order the verification of the family’s aboriginal bloodline by accessing documents held by Births, Deaths & Marriages New South Wales or elsewhere”.  Of course now she is still denied the ability to claim ‘next of kin’ status; not an executor/administrator or a beneficiary under her mother’s will, with the documents protected by the mother’s privacy.  Even though the case has been dismissed the bloodline will in time be verified as Helen does further research.

14.  Further Explosive Revelations of Attempted Strangulation
Helen’s affidavit further alleges that Mary attempted to strangle her to death when she was a Baby.

15.  Corruption Embedded in Mary Gaudron’s Career
Of course, we don’t believe for one minute that Mary Gaudron succeeded because of her determination. More than likely the real story is that the well-known ladies man, Robert J. Hawke, former Prime Minister of Australia (1983-1991) granted her a favour or two.  Did Gaudron open her legs to make the appointment stick?

If you are wondering why the case was dismissed, you need only look at Gaudron’s moral backbone of being a labor (read socialist/communist) sympathiser.  Looking at Gaudron’s and Michael Kirby’s connection when younger to the communist agenda, they obviously took the much more time honoured approach of patience, a feature of Fabian Socialism, rather than the raw brutality and police state approach of communism.  When I saw Michael Kirby at a legal dinner, he wore his gold symbol of the brotherhood loud and proud.  In fact it does seem odd does it not, that in a time of great discrimination against gays and women, that a gay man and a woman would succeed in gaining the highest and most respectful jobs in the land?

In the time of corruption in the Neville Wran and Joh Bjelke-Peterson governments, Gaudron was NSW Solicitor General.  She was friends with a number of people of bad character such as Lionel Murphy, a disgraced former High Court Judge; Norman Thomas William Allan(­Chief Commissioner of police NSW 1962-1972)  and Sir Robert William Askin (32nd Premier of New South Wales 1965-1975).  There were many people that joined the divide between Queensland and New South Wales.  In the corruption scandal that engulfed the government of Joh Bjelke Peterson and the Wran Government, it is not too far-fetched to say that Mary Gaudron had an interest in keeping the lid on information getting out to the public, because she was directly involved.  Could this be the reason she advised the Wran Government that any member of the police be provided with disincentives to block them from coming forward with further information in regard to the Age Tapes.  There can be no doubt that Gaudron’s advice helped protect her Labor “mates” including Lionel Murphy.

Sir Robert ASKIN (premier of NSW) and Norman Thomas William Allan 1967 (Police Commissioner NSW) and Shirley Margaret Brifman were involved in the Fitzgerald Inquiry in Qld

Wikipedia states that the allegations of corruption against Askin were revived in 2008 when Alan Saffron, the son of the late Sydney crime boss Abe Saffron, published a biography of his father in which he alleged that Saffron had paid bribes to major public officials including Askin, former police commissioner Norman Allan, and other leading figures whom he claimed he could not name because they were still alive. Alan Saffron alleged that his father made payments of between $5000 and $10,000 per week to both men over many years that Askin and Allan both visited Saffron’s office on several occasions that Allan also visited the Saffron family home, and that Abe Saffron paid for an all-expenses overseas trip for Allan and a young female ‘friend’. He also alleged that, later in Askin’s premiership, Abe Saffron became the “bagman” for Sydney’s illegal liquor and prostitution rackets and most illegal gambling activities, collecting payoffs that were then passed to Askin, Allan and others, in return for which his father was completely protected.”

The young female friend could have been the prostitute Shirley Margaret Brifman who was on Askin’s and Allen’s payroll at the time.  Brifman, 35, was supposedly found dead by her teenage daughter Mary Anne and supposedly ended her life in her Brisbane safe house on March 4, 1972, after fleeing Sydney.  Police declared a suspected drug overdose, and did not order an autopsy, however in one article it was stated that the daughter claimed that it was not a drug overdose as a person had visited that night and threatened her mother, and in another article the daughter said her mother was overdosing all the time, and still in another article that a woman who visited Brifman handed her a vial of drugs, telling Brifman to end her life or her children would be targeted.

Brifman was due to be the chief witness against a senior Queensland detective in a perjury case.  Brifman had been paying graft to corrupt police since the late 1950s, and in 1971 had gone on national television and blown the whistle on officers in both Queensland and NSW.  It is believed Shirley Brifman was murdered because she had arranged a live interview with the ABC to blow the whistle on Askin and Allen.

The plot thickens when Helen alleges that at the time of Shirley Margaret Brifman’s murder, Mary Gaudron also lived in the same apartment complex in Elizabeth Bay which was her family home.  Helen said that she thought Brifman was shot in the Elizabeth Bay unit, and she never knew anything about her fleeing to Clayfield, Brisbane, which is the story currently circulating in newspapers.  Considering the file on Brifman was supposedly destroyed and there was a gag order placed on the file contents for up to sixty years, it is clear that there has been a monumental cover-up concerning Shirley Margaret Brifman’s murder.

16.  Losing the Battle to Win the War
In another similar David and Goliath story of the McLibel case in the UK, McDonalds won its court case against some activists, but lost the war of public opinion.  While Mary Gaudron may have won the battle over the Will, moral activists can win the war of public opinion, so if you like this story, please make it go viral to force this story be covered on mainstream media.

Electoral Report fails to address some big Issues: Australian Democracy is an Illusion

Article by Lex Stewart
President, Australians for Honest Elections Inc.
www.afhe.org.au
With comments by R.L.F.

 ·       Does Government have the competence to fix the voting systems?
 ·       The Joint Standing Committee on Electoral Matters (JSCEM) has failed
 ·       “Vote Early, Vote Often” frauds can continue, unaffected by this report

The report of the JSCEM released on 15 April touched on some longstanding faults in our electoral system, while tackling few of the major issues that need fixing.

“There are some long-running sores that seem to have been avoided by the Joint Committee in its 216-page report, after conducting 21 public hearings and receiving 216 written submissions, including four from this organisation, Australians for Honest Elections”, said AFHE President Lex Stewart.

Our website http://www.afhe.org.au/our-recommendations.html  lists in approximate priority order 9 major recommendations to overcome deficiencies in our electoral systems.  The JSCEM report has addressed only items 3 and 8 out of our 9.

AFHE President Lex Stewart says, “While we commend the JSCEM in making its recommendation 17 for identity before a person is allowed to vote in person (like the Queensland ID introduced a year ago, which the current ALP government is about to remove), the JSCEM has avoided addressing major issues” such as:-

  • the need to require identity before being put onto the Electoral Roll, i.e. the need to delete Commonwealth Electoral Act Sec 98AA (2) (c) which has been used to create thousands of false enrolments (as were used in the recent NSW State election);
  • the lack of proper ID for postal voting (this major source of rorting was used recently in Queensland inter alia to rob Pauline Hanson of a seat by a tiny margin);

(Postal voting has long been recognised as fertile ground for cheating, therefore many countries do not allow it.  UK Election Commissioner Richard Mawrey QC, who has sent people to jail from both sides of politics, horrified during his visit to Australia 4 years ago, said that ‘postal voting is a recipe for fraud … the system is highly vulnerable at a number of critical  points’;  yet his concerns have been ignored by JSCEM)

  • the need to restore Subdivisional voting – to tackle the multiple voting admitted by the AEC as having been 18,770 in the September 2013 election, yet no prosecutions were done! Nor will any be possible if the JSCEM report recommendations are used!
  • the lack of integrity in the Electoral Roll. Pages 75 to 83 of the report can only be described as ‘pathetic’, when one considers what the Australian National Audit Office reports of 2002, 2004 and 2010 said, things which were largely ignored by the AEC.

“AFHE has pointed out many issues to media and JSCEM over the last 19 months, yet they have ignored most of our concerns, based on 22 years of experience,”

“Due to the inadequacies of this JSCEM report coming out over 19 months after the 2013 election, it is plain to all who would be interested in Australia having an honest democracy, that there remain major issues not yet addressed,” said Mr Stewart.

“Whether the Government and Minister Ronaldson are capable of, or interested in, addressing these issues to have honest and fair elections remains to be seen.”

 Comments:  
For those of you new to the subject of democracy, and whether or not it exists in our country, you can see plainly that democracy is an illusion.  However, reclaiming our “democracy” is a waste of time in reality, since it is a system of Mob (majority) rule.  Now this would be fine if the majority had a strong moral code, was capable of using that thing between their ears (the brain = ability to think (analyse; decode reality) and knew the truth about history.

Unfortunately, as the majority of Australians have differing moral codes if any; the ability to think has been stolen by the dumbing down of intellect in the school system, through dangerous additives in vaccinations and poison in our food and water; and fed propaganda and lies as news, this does not behoove a good form of  democracy anyway.

The answer is the original model of the American Constitution, a Republic, where we all have inherent rights granted to us at birth, and we are all armed, with a limited and small government, where the sovereign country retains its rights to control its own money supply.

When government considers us a fiction (see the Birth Certificate/Legal Person); and gives us benefits and privileges but does not recognise our inherent rights (human rights); and when the government is controlled by corporations not the people, then we have a problem.  A BIG PROBLEM.  The stuff that civil wars are fought over, but the civil war of today is an intellectual war, an Information War.

The answer is to regain control of our education system, and control of the courts by restoring the Rule of Law:  Common Law which in reality is unobstructed Juries and Grand Juries with the power of Jury Nullification, founded upon the Magna Carta in 1215, which is 800 years old this year (2015) but has largely been repudiated by various Statutes masquerading as law.

“The people perish for lack of knowledge” (Hosea 4:6 KJB).

You can start your journey today down the rabbithole, and find out why our country is becoming more communistic and fascist year in and year out by reading Carroll Quigley’s book “Tragedy and Hope:  A History of the World in Our Time”.

And that my friends reminds me of a joke:  “What’s 5000 lawyers at the bottom of the ocean?  A:  A good start”.

 

JFK Assassination – 50 Year Anniversary: The Truth Will Out

This is an article written by Kenn d’Oudney of www.democracydefined.org
T
his article is covered in full for public educational purposes and for the public restoration of the Jury Justice System.

Frame 150 from the Zapruder Film

Frame 150 from the Zapruder Film (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Dear Members,
Greetings. We hope you are well.

JFK.
“The truth will out.”

Et tu, Brute,”* quoth Julius Cæsar to his associate Senator Brutus, as the last of the high-placed conspirators plunged a dagger into his torn body. One might well have said that to LBJ

*”And you too, Brutus?”

The 1963 coup d’état signals the ultimate overt takeover of Western government. The 22nd of November is the day the banks’ owners’ 1913 conspiracy came of age. Those who are aware of and unafraid to confront the evidence understand and do what they can to resist the treachery of modern politicians and judiciary. Subsequently, all our ‘politicians’ and ‘judges’ toe-the-line without hesitation or they are replaced.

All societies govern through their Justice System. The power to punish carries with it all power. Restoration re-establishes the Absolute Sovereignty of the People through their Courts of Justice backed by the police, prison service and Armed Services. That is why we advocate a mass educational campaign to emplace RESTORATION; the Constitutional Common Law Trial by Jury being the only peaceful way known to humankind by which to hold wayward government to the will of the people.

The owned-and-controlled mainstream media show no inclination to publish the execrable truth as to how all the beneficent aspects of Western Civilisation are being destroyed to allow an utterly sanguivolent* clandestine world dictatorship to arise. The duty falls to ‘ordinary’ men and women, We the People, to take responsible actions to re-assert the just authority of the people over harmful misgovernment. This would include the forwarding of these selected serious videos and texts which expose the cover-up.

*Definition. sanguivolent, bloodthirsty.

Further to the videos recently circulated to you, here are others which need to be taken seriously. Understanding how the Zapruder film was re-made into a composite before its showing to the Warren Commission, and eventually the public, is helpful. To conceal the slowing and stopping of the car in the kill zone, by removal of tell-tale frames whilst the film was in possession of the FBI, contributes to establishing cover-up.

JFK’s Revenge part 1 – The Zapruder Film Was Altered
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Am4qdl9PTA

The Muchmore Film Suggests Frames Were Removed from the Zapruder Film
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hrX8lsb2WTk

Please note that attorney Mark Lane’s first class, moving video, Two Men in Dallas has five parts.  Here is a recapitulation of various videos:

Is Fecit Cui Profuit:
He did the deed who profited by it.

Consider the imminent reduction of the oil depletion allowance (billions); the planned withdrawal of the military from Vietnam; the treasury (not Federal Reserve) printing of billions of interest-free cash for issue in 1964 (subsequently burned at LBJ’s order); the progressive takeover from the private banks and Fed of the issuance of credit (interest-free) and national currency (à la Lincoln and the ‘greenbacks’); the dissolution of the CIA; the advocated rapprochement with the USSR; consequent massive reduction of armaments and military expenditures; the investigation of LBJ for large-scale graft and possible involvement in Texas homicides by Attorney General Bobby Kennedy’s department… just for starters…

In case you have not yet seen them, I have listed for you some videos indispensable to the acquisition of an objective overview.

We have great respect for attorney Mark Lane’s painstaking, courageous expositions. He interviewed people whose eye-witness and other crucial testimony was excluded by the FBI (Hoover) from presentation to the Warren Commission.

Not that the commission was slow to invent false schemes of its own; viz. Gerald Ford ‘moved’ the middle-right back-wound ‘up’ to allow the small frontal throat-entry-wound to ‘become’ an ‘exit’ wound to explain away a shot he claimed to have been from behind and above (despite Parkland doctors’ designating it a small circular entry aperture “about the width of the end of a little finger”).

After the cadaver had left Parkland, the front throat wound was subsequently photographed much enlarged, presumably from a discreet, unadmitted intervention to locate, extract and conceal another bullet lodged internally, and to obscure it as having been another shot from the front (making at least four shots, with James Tague‘s pavement near miss). However, eyewitnesses at the hospital saw that the car had taken two more hits. The president’s brain was also removed at that undisclosed intervention (before the official post mortem; autopsy; see Hankey’s video and TMWKK), as witnessed by the Bethesda hospital porters when it arrived in Washington.

Another fiction was assistant counsel to the commission Arlen Specter’s impossible ‘single bullet theory’ which claimed to have struck first Kennedy from behind and exited his throat at the front, and then passed through the back/chest/rib, right wrist and finally lodged in the left thigh of Connolly, ‘apparently’ falling out onto the hospital trolley to be ‘found’ by a porter.

John Hankey spotted the Hoover-to-George Bush letter of reply and saw its incriminating significance. It was only released from secret FBI files around the turn of this century amongst hundreds of thousands of other pages of documents.

The coup d’état was complete and the instigators are still at it. Old they may be, but some of these military-industrial complex bank-owner-villains are active to this day. Their putrescent progeny are out of the same mould.

Also, LBJ’s mistress admits knowledge to his participation in the conspiracy; well worth a look.

Oswald’s girlfriend in Dallas’s fascinating account gives a rare view of the man.

CIA operative E. Howard Hunt (who participated in the CIA’s illegal but admitted 1954 overthrow of the elected president of Guatemala, Jacobo Arbenz Guzmán; was involved in the planning of the failed Bay of Pigs invasion of Cuba; and was later one of the White House’s Watergate burglars), made a deathbed audio tape confession to his son stating his prior knowledge of the conspiracy, and describing as “maniacal” LBJ’s obsession with becoming president. After Hunt’s death, his sons Howard St. John and David released the tape and notes of their father’s confessions onto the Internet.

1. Rush to Judgement, attorney Mark Lane’s sobering investigation
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LnzpDZDnvNY

2. Two Men in Dallas. Mark Lane’s interview of fated Dallas witness, honest policeman Roger Craig – part one http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QyvRfeLDsB4
part two http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UFEx8hjD8kE
Five essential Parts. Never forget: 1.) The Mauser — no Mannlicher Carcano was present in the TSBDepository; and 2.) The presence of Malcolm ‘Mac’ Wallace’s little-fingerprint in the TSBD sniper’s nest. Wallace was a released but previously convicted murderer of a golf-pro dating LBJ’s sister. The unfortunate man was disapproved of by LBJ.

3. The Men who Killed Kennedy Documentary, Oswald’s girlfriend’s account, part 8 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3rluPItXdPA

4. In addition to part 8, the entire documentary, TMWKK, is recommended.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x2agPurqFJk
Coroner and lifelong forensic scientist Howard Wecht’s professional assessments, and former senior secret service officer Prouty’s explanation about the desertion of duty, stand-down and complicity of secret service personnel present, are compelling. Much else of interest too.

5. JFK II – The Bush Connection Documentary by John Hankey http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HyiAXy8L8-I

6. LBJ’s mistress nails him! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=POmdd6HQsus

7. E.H. Hunt’s deathbed confessions http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bD4611qW6R8

Yours sincerely,
Kenn.

Kenn d’Oudney.
www.democracydefined.org

Better never to vote at all than vote for a person who does not make EQUAL JUSTICE the prime aim of government by RESTORATION and UNIVERSAL ADOPTION of Constitutional Legem Terræ Common Law Trial by Jury.”

Is the new Pope Francis Peter the Roman?

Excerpt from http://www.zengardner.com

Every occurrence of the number thirteen, and likewise of every multiple of it, stamps that with which it stands in connection with rebellion, apostasy, defection, corruption, disintegration, revolution, or some kindred idea.

Pope Francis met with media

Pope Francis met with media (Photo credit: Catholic Church (England and Wales))

On March 13, 2013, Cardinal Jorge Mario Bergoglio of the Jewish Society of Jesus, former right hand man to Jesuit Superiors General Pedro Arrupe and Peter-Hans Kolvenbach has been elected Pope Francis after St. Francis of Assisi Francesco di Pietro (Peter) di Bernardone, an Italian who was once a beggar in Rome, effectively making Bergoglio “Peter the Roman.”

Francis is the first Jesuit and the first from the Americas to be elected Pope and almost certainly the last pope prophesied.  He is the first non-European pope since Syrian-born Pope Gregory III, who served for ten years (731–741).  Francis I appears to fulfil Revelation 17:11 and the sequel to the prophecies of St. Malachy:

“In extreme persecution, the seat of the Holy Roman Church will be occupied by Peter the Roman, who will feed the sheep through many tribulations, at the term of which the city of seven hills will be destroyed [in accordance with Revelation 18:4-20], and the formidable Judge will judge His people. The End !, after the brief ‘hot stage’ of World War III”

Jesuit Pope Agenda – Meet The Templars, Knights of Malta And Blackwater/Xe Exterminators … Friday, March 15th, 2013.

Mining for the Truth is like digging at the decrepit body of manipulated worldly information for real substance. A pile of petrified insanity, we’re chipping away at it until inner forms are revealed. That the new Pope is a Jesuit, the first one ever, is a very big deal. The Jesuits are no small force. People think they resemble innocuous Franciscan monks who focus on education.  Nothing could be further from the truth. They are the polar opposite. Of the worst sort.

Beware this new Pope. His roots are nasty and we’re in an age of increasing darkness and violence. This ruthless, militant Jesuit “society” has one hellish oath that should get you wondering and researching real fast.

 

English: Monochrome version of the IHS emblem ...

English: Monochrome version of the IHS emblem of the Jesuits Polski: IHS – symbol Towarzystwa Jezusowego (zakonu jezuitów) (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

The Jesuit Oath Exposed
Hold on for this one. This is an excerpt, and this oath is still in use.

I do further promise and declare that I will, when opportunity presents, make and wage relentless war, secretly and openly, against all heretics, Protestants and Masons, as I am directed to do, to extirpate them from the face of the whole earth; and that I will spare neither age, sex nor condition, and that will hang, burn, waste, boil, flay, strangle, and bury alive these infamous heretics; rip up the stomachs and wombs of their women, and crush their infants’ heads against the walls in order to annihilate their execrable race. That when the same cannot be done openly I will secretly use the poisonous cup, the strangulation cord, the steel of the poniard, or the leaden bullet, regardless of the honour, rank, dignity or authority of the persons, whatever may be their condition in life, either public or private, as I at any time may be directed so to do by any agents of the Pope or Superior of the Brotherhood of the Holy Father of the Society of Jesus.

In confirmation of which I hereby dedicate my life, soul, and all corporal powers, and with the dagger which I now receive I will subscribe my name written in my blood in testimony thereof; and should I prove false, or weaken in my determination, may my brethren and fellow soldiers of the militia of the Pope cut off my hands and feet and my throat from ear to ear, my belly be opened and sulphur burned therein with all the punishment that can be inflicted upon me on earth, and my soul shall be tortured by demons in eternal hell forever.

 

Revisionist History Cover Up – Meet the Jesuit Order
The Jesuit Order is an almost 500-year old covert operations, geo-political, male-only organization, structured as a secret military operation: demanding secret oaths and complete obedience to each direct superior, which is ultimately the Superior General (often nicknamed as the Black Pope, since he dresses in black and ‘stands in the shadow’ of the white Pope).

The “Society of Jesus” – as they are officially known – was originally used by the Vatican to counter the various Reformation movements in Europe, to which the Vatican lost much of its religious and political power. Absolute-temporal-ruling power has always been the Vatican institution’s primary objective. Source

While so-called modern history hardly mentions how hated this fanatical sect was, it wasn’t long ago that it was well known to be an “odious” and extremely dangerous organization.

Just look at these quotes:

“My history of the Jesuits is not eloquently written, but it is supported by unquestionable authorities, [and] is very particular and very horrible. Their [the Jesuit Order’s] restoration [in 1814 by Pope Pius VII] is indeed a step toward darkness, cruelty, despotism, [and] death. … I do not like the appearance of the Jesuits. If ever there was a body of men who merited eternal damnation on earth and in hell, it is this Society of [Ignatius de] Loyola.” – John Adams (1735-1826; 2nd President of the United States)

“It is my opinion that if the liberties of this country – the United States of America – are destroyed, it will be by the subtlety of the Roman Catholic Jesuit priests, for they are the most crafty, dangerous enemies to civil and religious liberty. They have instigated MOST of the wars of Europe.” – Marquis de LaFayette (1757-1834; French statesman and general. He served in the American Continental Army under the command of General George Washington during the American Revolutionary War.)

“The war [i.e., the American Civil War of 1861-1865] would never have been possible without the sinister influence of the Jesuits.” – Abraham Lincoln (1809-1865; 16th President of the United States)

“The Jesuits…are a secret society – a sort of Masonic order – with superadded features of revolting odiousness, and a thousand times more dangerous.” – Samuel Morse (1791-1872; American inventor of the telegraph; author of the book Foreign Conspiracy Against the Liberties of the United States)

“[The Jesuits] are the deadly enemies of civil and religious liberty.” – R. W. Thompson (Ex-Secretary, American Navy)

“The Jesuits are a MILITARY organization, not a religious order. Their chief is a general of an army, not the mere father abbot of a monastery. And the aim of this organization is power – power in its most despotic exercise – absolute power, universal power, power to control the world by the volition of a single man [i.e., the Black Pope, the Superior General of the Jesuits]. Jesuitism is the most absolute of despotisms [sic] – and at the same time the greatest and most enormous of abuses…” – Napoleon I (i.e., Napoleon Bonaparte; 1769-1821; emperor of the French)

Next, I defer to Vigilant Citizen with his succinct summary of the Illuminati/Jesuit connections:

Adam Weishaupt, Trained by the Jesuits

Adam Weishaupt was born in Ingolstadt, Bavaria on February 6, 1748. His father died when he was seven and his godfather, Baron Ickstatt, entrusted his early education to the most powerful group of the time: the Jesuits. Known for its subversive methods and conspiratorial tendencies, the Society of Jesus had a stronghold on Bavaria’s politics and educational system.

“The degree of power to which the representatives of the Society of Jesus had been able to attain in Bavaria was all but absolute. Members of the order were the confessors and preceptors of the electors; hence they had a direct influence upon the policies of government. The censorship of religion had fallen into their eager hands, to the extent that some of the parishes even were compelled to recognize their authority and power. To exterminate all Protestant influence and to render the Catholic establishment complete, they had taken possession of the instruments of public education. It was by Jesuits that the majority of the Bavarian colleges were founded, and by them they were controlled. By them also the secondary schools of the country were conducted.” 4

The inner-workings of the Society of Jesus was quite similar to the occult Brotherhoods it was apparently working against. It functioned with degrees, initiation rites, elaborate rituals and esoteric symbols and had been suppressed countless times in several countries due to its subversive tendencies.

In 1773, Weishaupt’s godfather used his great influence at the University of Ingolstadt to place his godson as chair of canon law. At that time, the institution was under heavy Jesuitical dominance and that particular position was traditionally held by influential Jesuits. Weishaupt’s growing embrace of Age of Enlightenment philosophies placed him at odds with the Jesuits and all kinds of political drama ensued. Despite this fact, Weishaupt learned a lot from the Jesuit’s organization and their subversive methods to obtain power. It is during this time that the idea of a Secret Society began to enter Weishaupt’s thoughts.

“Brilliant, and well trained in the conspiratorial methods of access to power, young Weishaupt decided to organize a body of conspirators, determined to free the world from the Jesuitical rule of Rome.” 5

While some authors believe that the Jesuits (who were suppressed by papal bull in 1773) used Weishaupt to perpetuate their rule, others state that he was seeking to overthrow their powerful hold on Bavaria. On a wider scale, he was convinced that the world would profit from the overthrow of all governmental and religious institutions in the world to replace them by a world-wide, yet secretive, committee of “initiates”. To achieve his aims, he would use Jesuit methods against the Jesuits.

The Militant Catholic Church and World Domination
Few would believe what the Vatican has been up to all these centuries. Vietnam was commonly known as Spelly’s War, named after Cardinal Spellman. Why…Exterminating infidels?  Cardinal Spellman gave mass to the troops in WW2

Successor to Fascist Dictator Francisco Franco and Knight of Malta, King Juan Carlos, with Grand Master of the Sovereign Military Order of Malta, Andrew Cardinal Bertie

Knight of Malta Amschel Mayer Rothschild (1744–1812)

The Knights of Malta is not merely a “charitable organization”.  That’s just an elaborate front… As the name Sovereign Military Order of Malta (SMOM) confirms, it is a military order based on the crusader Knights Hospitaller of Jerusalem and is interwoven with Freemasonry. Most people have never even heard of SMOM, much less that it is a part of Freemasonry. But that is the way the aristocratic elite like it.

(same double eagle as Freemasonry–ed.)

One of the symbols of the military orders of the Vatican, the masonic double-headed eagle emblazoned with the Maltese cross, signifies omnipotent royal dominion over both East and West. The orb signifies temporal dominion over the globe of Earth, and the scepter signifies control over the spiritual and religious impulses of humanity.

This eagle symbol is used in the masonic rite of Memphis and Misraim, under which it reads, “Order Out of Chaos”, the Hegelian method of crisis creation. It is found on the seals of many European and Eurasian nation states including that of Russia, indicating direct Vatican control over those countries. (Source)

More on the Double-headed Eagle and the ‘Redshilds’

The two-headed eagle emblem of the Byzantine Empire (Roman Empire) on a Red Shield was adopted in 1743 by the infamous goldsmith Amschel Moses Bauer. He opened a coin shop in Frankfurt, Germany and hung above his door this Roman eagle on a red shield. The shop became known as the “Red Shield firm”. The German word for ‘red shield’ is Rothschild. After this point, the Rothschilds became the bankers to kings and pontiffs alike, among the richest families in the world. Ever since, they have financed both sides of every major war and revolution using the Hegelian Dialectic to engineer society toward their New World Order.

The Rothschilds and their agents, such as the Rockefellers, have been engineering America and its foreign policy almost since its inception. They and their Skull and Bones Wall Street partners staged and funded both sides in WWII, and out of that hellish nightmare was born their infant global government, the United Nations, and their tool of tyranny, the CIA. The father of the CIA, “Wild Bill” Donovan, was a Knight of Malta. In order to be a director of the CIA you must be a crusading Knight of Malta and it doesn’t hurt if you are a member of Skull and Bones either. In order to reach the highest levels in the Pentagon establishment, you must be an illuminated Freemason and/or a Knight of one order or another. Notable US military members of SMOM include top crusading generals such as Alexander Haig, William Westmoreland, and Charles A. Willoughby, an admitted Fascist.

Other notable members include:
* Reinhard Gehlen (Nazi war criminal)
* Heinrich Himmler (Nazi war criminal)
* Kurt Waldheim (Nazi war criminal)
* Franz von Papen (Hitler enabler)
* Fritz Thyssen (Hitler’s financier)
* Rupert Murdoch
* Tony Blair
* Pat Buchanan
* William F. Buckley, Jr.
* Precott Bush, Jr.
* Edward Egan (Archbishop NY)
* Licio Gelli
* Ted Kennedy
* David Rockefeller
* Phyllis Schlafly (Dame)
* J. Edgar Hoover
* Joseph Kennedy
* Henry Luce
* Thomas ‘Tip’ O’Neill
* Ronald E. Reagan
* Giscard d’Estaing
* Allen Dulles
* Avery Dulles
* Frank C Carlucci
* Nelson Mandela
* Rick Santorum
* Juan Carlos (King of Spain and Jerusalem)
* Oliver North
* George H.W Bush
* Augusto Pinochet
* William Randolph Hearst
* Francis L. Kellogg

Coat of Arms of Queensland

Coat of Arms of Queensland (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

The Queensland Australia Connection

Note the Cross of Malta in the coat of arms of the State of Queensland, Australia … all Judges in Queensland are Catholics.

The Blackwater / Xe Connection

Such a list should make anyone sit up and pay attention, but it is only the tip of the iceberg unfortunately. Then we come to another SMOM member, important to what is transpiring in Iraq and other toppled or soon to-be-toppled States. Educated at the Jesuit Georgetown University, former Pentagon Inspector General Joseph Edward Schmitz, Blackwater’s operations chief, is a member of both SMOM and Opus Dei.

Former Pentagon Inspector General Joseph Edward Schmitz quit in 2005 to work for Blackwater. He is a member of Opus Dei and Knights of Malta. At least $2 trillion went “missing” from the Pentagon during his watch.

The Knights of Malta in Iraq?
Malta Star | Sep 29, 2007

An American investigative journalist compared the US firm Blackwater, the biggest security services provider in post war Iraq, to the Knights of Malta.  The company is currently in the midst of a controversy after some of its 20,000 personnel stationed in Iraq killed a number of civilians.

In his book, ‘Blackwater: The Rise of the World’s Most Powerful Mercenary Army’, Jeremy Scahill links the modern security firm to the Knights of Malta.  The writer argues that “Blackwater’s employees… share the same religious zeal of ancient crusaders”, the Egyptian weekly newspaper Al-Ahram reported.

All the top Nazis in our government are connected in some way to the Vatican, Jesuits and Knights of Malta and have been for decades, as were the Italian Fascists and German Nazis of WWII. After all, what was their favorite symbol after the swastika? The Maltese Cross of course!(Dejan Lucic–source)

Earlier Malta Boys Formed the “Intelligence” Agencies.  Who formed the CIA? It was a Catholic Knight of Malta, William “Wild Bill” Donovan. He was considered the “father of the CIA.” he was also the former head of the OSS before he was used to create the CIA.

Donovan was given an especially prestigious form of knighthood that has only been given to a hundred other men in history.

Over the years there have been many CIA bosses who were also Knights of Malta and/or Jesuit trained.

And Who Formed the FBI?

It was a powerful Roman Catholic who was also a Knight of Malta and a trustee of The Catholic University of America. Charles Joseph Bonaparte.

“The degree of Knight of Malta is conferred in the United States as “an appendant Order” in a Commandery of Knights Templar. ~Source

Blackwater/Xe – Today’s Crusading Templars/Knights of Malta?

Blackwater/Xe is more than just a “private army”, and much more than just another capitalist war-profiteering business operation.

It is an army operating outside all laws, outside and above the US Constitution and yet is controlled by people within and outside our government whose allegiance is primarily to the foreign Vatican state. In other words, Blackwater/Xe is a religious army serving the Pope in Rome through the Order of Malta, which is itself considered under international law, as a sovereign entity with special diplomatic powers and privileges.

Like Blackwater, the Order of Malta is “untouchable” because it is at the heart of the elite aristocracy. ~Source

The ‘beauty’ of private mercenaries, a growing trend worldwide as we move toward a fascist global state, is that they’re not held accountable to anything like regular military bodies are, and can operate outside the confines of such things as international law, political restraints, or the immobility of large armies. In addition, when their loyalties can be traced to an over-riding allegiance to a foreign state or other seditious influence, we have even more serious problems.

English: Erik D. Prince (born June 6, 1969), a...

English: Erik D. Prince (born June 6, 1969), american founder and sole owner of the private military company Xe; portrait photograph of a man with short hair, wearing a suit and tie, his hands folded in front of him. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Erik, Prince of War

Erik Prince, the founder and owner of the now infamous US corporation, Blackwater/Xe, hails from Holland, Michigan where his family was both powerful and prominent in two institutions – (1) the Republican Party and (2) the evangelical Christian Church. After scandals hit his large and lucrative firm, Prince ordered a curious rebranding that changed its name to Xe.

From the perspective of medieval Christian symbology, ‘Xe’ is a combination of the Christic cross and the Greek letter, Epsilon, the first letter in the Greek word, Evangelion, glad tidings or gospel. From the perspective of a modern member of the Knights Templar, Xe is immediately recognizable as it symbolizes Christian Evangelism. (source)

Now there’s an honest face…

The Catholic connection, unlike his family, which is part of the Christian Reformed Church, Erik Prince is a Catholic. Interestingly enough, most of the leadership at Blackwater/Xe is also Catholic, albeit a conservative wing of the church that is quite reactionary. Erik Prince is personally connected to conservative Catholic groups like Catholic Answer, Crisis magazine, and a Grand Rapids-based group, the Acton Institute.

Prince’s relationship to what Scahill calls the “Theocon” movement is not marginal. Prince himself writes about this relationship and it’s importance, particularly with the mission of Blackwater. Prince says “Everybody carries guns, just like the Prophet Jeremiah rebuilding the temple in Israel – a sword in one hand and a trowel in the other.”

Prince’s background

Erik Prince’s personal Crusade

Among his personnel at Xe, Prince is known to be a high-profile Islamophobe who believes his personal mission in life is to bring about the total extinction of the Muslim population of this planet in what he has described as a global campaign of genocide or a, “Crusade.”

Here is an excerpt of an article about Prince that appeared in The Economist:

In an affidavit lodged with a court in Virginia, one of the witnesses said that Mr Prince “views himself as a Christian crusader tasked with eliminating Muslims and the Islamic faith from the globe.” The statement continues…

“To that end, Mr. Prince intentionally deployed to Iraq certain men who shared his vision of Christian supremacy, knowing and wanting these men to take every available opportunity to murder Iraqis. Many of these men used call signs based on the Knights of the Templar, the warriors who fought the Crusades.”

How comforting. Murder for hire meets religious zeal embedded in Christian patriotism. Nice combo.

Blackwater/Xe Headquarters in Moyock, N.C.

Beware: They’re Proliferating…

It gets worse, this captivating cause, these deviant demons, are metastasizing:

Through a network of 30 subsidiaries and shell corporations, Blackwater-linked entities provided “intelligence, training and security services” to a cache of major multinational firms, including: Monsanto, Chevron, the Walt Disney Company, Royal Caribbean Cruise Lines, Deutsche Bank and Barclays, according to documents obtained.

Blackwater’s owner and founder, Erik Prince — who has himself been linked to the CIA — helped train companies through two other firms he controlled: Total Intelligence Solutions and the Terrorism Research Center. (Source)

Imagine a worldwide Mafia with many ‘families’…

There’s so much more to this than can be covered here, but it’s certainly worth investigating. These secretive controllers have many arms, many disguises, but all are carefully controlled and working in concert…although I’m sure these evil forces have their differences, which would explain some of the discrepancies we see in the news.

But they all converge at the apex of power and control somehow. Nasty bunch who don’t flinch at eliminating each other either.

It’s also apparent the ‘Powers That Be’ love these ‘free hands’ of blindly committed ‘crusaders’ we’ve described here to wreak havoc, vengeance, chaos, conflict, anything to justify their continued war on humanity until it’s beaten into a fascist one world state of submission. Know, too, all the ‘intelligence’ agencies CIA, Mossad, MI6, ISI, etc. are all connected with these boys and many others, which is why it’s so hard to clearly expose the perfidy of what’s happening since they’re all in it together in an unholy, strangely knotted alliance.

Conclusion…The Goal is to Terrorize, Divide and Conquer–then Unite Under their ‘Illumined Leadership’

So they hope. Evil cannot triumph in the long run–they can only flail against the Truth which stands indomitable, inextinguishable and eternal. Their only temporal power is in fear and ignorance, which is why we need to do all we can to enlighten and empower those around us.

And it’s not all black and white, so don’t expect complete clarity before taking action. Nor is there anything to get fearful about. Many of those on the inside want out, but cannot escape. Many are working to change this pattern, or alert their fellow man, such as the man who testified about Erik Prince. Look for it. We are the power. There are very few of them. All we need to do is wake up–and stay awake. And alert others. We’ll know what to do next.

But we must be informed and connect these dots for ourselves. And this is only part of the picture. Once people realize it’s not paranoia to realize there are very real agendas afoot, things start to clear up.

Although it can be somewhat daunting at first…

“Some of the biggest men in the United States, in the field of commerce and manufacture, are afraid of something. They know that there is a power somewhere so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that they had better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it.” – President Woodrow Wilson

Screw that attitude! What cowards..that’s what got us here, their fear of speaking up! In no way does that knowledge mean the rest of us are to remain in the dark or hide our heads in the sand.

Just the opposite!

Thankfully it gets clearer all the time! As dear Bill Hicks put it;

Everything makes sense if you just put on the right glasses.

Keep yours on, and bravely.
Love, Zen @ http://www.zengardner.com

Vatican Calls for World Government

Article Mirrored from Natural News.com (in black) with my comments in RED.

English: Pope Benedict XVI

English: Pope Benedict XVI (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Just to preface this article, the Vatican is at the center of a world wide conspiracy theory, dating back to Adam and Eve.  The Vatican is the Antichrist; a deceptive cult of satanic occultists and paedophiles.  The Antichrist is the mirror opposite of Christ.  The eyes are the mirror to the soul, and these are not kind eyes.  In their deceit they are unimaginative liars.  To understand what they mean, just take every major word and either apply its antonym or it’s strengthened meaning.  

These people in the Vatican, and elsewhere are communists, fabian socialists, malthusians, marxists, and every other nasty group of tyrants known throughout history.  These tyrants work together in government and non-government (NGO’s) throughout the world to bring about their common agenda.  This agenda is World Government and the United Nations Agenda 21, a forced de-population program.  In other words democide, which is genocide committed by government.

The symbols used in the Vatican, if studied will reveal the true history and thinking behind these people.  For instance, in Christianity the cross is at the top, whereas on the Pope‘s chair the cross is inverted.  The public pope wears a white robe.  The private pope wears a black robe, just like the Judges who sit in our courts.  When Courts of Justice deny people justice (trial by jury – legem terrae or common law) they are committing a judicial act.  Today in Australia we have Star Chambers which is trial by judge.  To find out what is happening today in and to Australians view the contents on this website http://australiatoday.webs.com/thesecretcovenant.htm and always remember to follow up with your own research.  

BE WARNED:  They plan to place a RFID chip in everyone.  They will be able to control your money supply which means they can cut you off and steal from you, they will be able to tell where you are at all times, and if you don’t behave, the cyanide within the RFID chip will be remotely released (yes, someone has a patent on this).  

DO NOT ALLOW THEM TO PLACE AN RFID CHIP IN YOU.  

To find out more read David Icke’s book “The Biggest Secret”. 

Benedict XVI (2005-present, Episcopal form of ...

Benedict XVI (2005-present, Episcopal form of Papal arms) An alternate version with Papal Tiara: here (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

(NaturalNews) During a recent speech he made before the Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace in Rome on December 3, Pope Benedict XVI, the current leader of the Roman Catholic Church, called for what can only be described as a unified world government, which he dubbed a “new evangelization of society” that aligns with the spirit of visions brought forth by previous popes.

While addressing the council, Pope Benedict XVI made numerous references to this “new evangelization” as an integral part of the Roman Catholic Church’s world mission. And when defining what this phrase actually means, Pope Benedict XVI spoke about how individualism must be transformed into a type of communalism marked by interconnectedness and “family formation” on a global scale.

Part of this entails the “construction of a world community,” as translated from the original speech, which was given in Italian. And to guide this world community will be a “corresponding authority” whose purpose it is to serve and promote the “common good of the human family.” In other words, a “New World Order,” in no uncertain terms, is the ultimate goal of the Roman Catholic Church.

Pope Benedict XVI is not interested in just any New World Order, however. He made it clear that the Roman Catholic Church’s responsibility is to guide those who are actually bringing about this world government in how to promote an “anthropological and ethical framework around the common good.” Along with this, will be a comprehensive reform of the corrupt international monetary and financial systems, of course in line with Roman Catholic doctrines.

English: pope benedict XVI in Brindisi Italian...

English: pope benedict XVI in Brindisi Italiano: Papa Benedetto XVI in visita a Brindisi (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Such language may initially sound benevolent to some, but what does it all really mean? Based on the Roman Catholic Church’s sordid history of consolidating power and mandating its religion on societies through a blending of church and state, it is hard to call such a proposition by Pope Benedict XVI anything other than a call for a dictatorial New World Order guided and controlled by the Roman Catholic Church.

“These latest remarks made by the Pope and the Catholic Church come as no surprise considering that in 2010 the Catholic Church sought the establishment of a new Central World Bank that would be responsible for regulating the global financial industry and the international money supply,” wrote Andrew Puhanic from Activist Post about Pope Benedict XVI’s latest speech.

“It was reported (back in 2011) that the Vatican sought ‘a supranatural authority’ which would have worldwide scope and ‘universal jurisdiction’ to guide and control global economic policies and decisions.” (http://www.infowars.com/vatican-calls-for-central-world-bank/)

Sources for this article include:
http://www.vatican.va
http://www.foxnews.com

Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/038477_Pope_world_government_New_Order.html#ixzz2GaI1rKfD

Decoding the Article: Rise and demise of an empire: the new world order

English: United States President Barack Obama ...

English: United States President Barack Obama signs into law the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 as Vice President Joe Biden looks on. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Analysis of the a “Story” (read propaganda or spin)  Mirrored from http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/world/us-election/rise-and-demise-of-an-empire-the-new-world-order-20121102-28pgi.html

November 3, 2012

NOTE:  MIRRORED Story is in BLACK My comments are in Red)

Official photographic portrait of US President...

Official photographic portrait of US President Barack Obama (born 4 August 1961; assumed office 20 January 2009) (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

As China and America face leadership transitions in coming weeks, the changes highlight how the Middle Kingdom (read Middle East / Middle Earth / Middle Power / United Nations)  is set to topple the US (read United States Corporation – note they did not say USA – they are going to topple Wall Street and bring on the biggest wall street crash seen in history) as the world’s lone superpower. (United Nations HQ are in America – allows UN to bring in Agenda 21 effortlessly, turning (new world) order out of chaos) in US Nick O’Malley and John Garnaut report.

Late one afternoon in mid-February China’s president-in-waiting, Xi Jinping, stood on the verandah of Sarah Lande’s home on a bluff that rises over the town of Muscatine in Iowa and looked out over the slow flow of the Mississippi River into Indiana.  (Who is Sarah Lande? – she is an knowing or unknowing agent for the UN Agenda 21 Sister Cities Friendship Association Propaganda Spin Machine) 

Over tea, in the rather grand front room of the Landes’ polished Victorian home, Xi told Lande he had dreamt of the Mississippi since reading Mark Twain as a child.  (Agenda 21 captures the rivers using law as wildlife corridors which prohibit human interference – get your water elsewhere sucker!!!)

Being one of the most powerful men on earth, Xi was not the only guest. Lande remembers the Muscatine mayor (knowing or unknowing agent of UN Agenda 21, or Freemason, or Fabian Socialist) , China’s ambassador to the United States and assorted Chinese ministers. There were also 14 men and women whom Lande refers to as the “group of friends” (secret society members such as the Chinese Dragon Mafia) Xi had met when he travelled to the region in 1985 as part of an agricultural exchange (Alabama had xxx acres of agricultural land turned into a reserve – get your food elsewhere suckers!!!  Is that what they’re planning for Muscatine?)

Mitt Romney at one of his presidential campaig...

Mitt Romney at one of his presidential campaign rallies. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

When Fairfax Media (owned & controlled propaganda/spin doctored media empire) visited last month (UN Agent) Lande showed off the group photo taken on her stairs, and standing by the fire place where Xi had stood she explained how he had said: “For me, you are America.”  (UN Agenda 21 plans to get rid of the people – then when there are no more people America ceases to exist).

It is easy to imagine how the pretty rural prosperity of Muscatine might have impressed a Chinese provincial official (at steal at those Real Estate prices – the rich buy up the land, turn it into carbon sinks while disallowing / disincentivising agiculture and making a motza profit) less than a decade after the end of the Cultural Revolution.

“We treated him – what we like to call – ‘Iowa nice’,” Lande explains, referring to a form of hospitality that tends to include warm plain talk, corn and pork (no gmo or vaccinated and hormally treated pork for Xi and his mates?).

Xi might not feel so welcome now, at the end of a long and bitterly fought election (what spin – China does not have elections) campaign in which China has sometimes been used as a cipher (cipher means encrypting text and hidden messages, also numerically stands for zero or no quantity and the numeral three, in numerology defines the three points on a pyramid – an symbol used in the secret societies) for American fears (fear is spin doctored because America has self-mutilated itself) of economic, social and political decline.

In ads and speeches the Republican candidate, Mitt Romney (globalist puppet and Morman read secret society CIA operative), has accused President Barack Obama (Globalist Manchurian Candidate) of being too soft on China (Romney is another war monger) and has vowed to label the Chinese as currency manipulators ”on day one”.  (That may be true but America’s problems began when it allowed the Federal Reserve to set up shop in 1913 – blame the Rothschild banks not China – China was apparently duped into buying mortgage backed securities and has since asked for its money back).

The Obama campaign has portrayed Romney as a vulture capitalist who has enriched himself by exporting American manufacturing jobs to China.  (Romney is part of the problem)

In one anti-Romney ad a worker explains how the new owners of his company instructed staff to remove the American flag.  Allegedly non-partisan independent groups have been on the attack, too.  Ten days ago a group called Citizens Against Government Waste revived a highly controversial ad, which is set in Beijing in the year 2030, in which a professor is lecturing a class on why great nations fail.

”America tried to spend and tax itself out of a great recession,” the professor explains in subtitled Mandarin. ”Of course, we owned most of their debt. So now they work for us.”

The professor titters, the class laughs.  (Its true and its no laughing matter)

In these dying days of the deadlocked election both parties have focused on Ohio, where Obama led by just 1.9 points (perfect for vote rigging) in the Real Clear Politics poll average on Tuesday.

All indications are that again this state could decided which party wins the election. There is also evidence that Obama is still enjoying some advantage among the white male demographic as a result of his bailout of the auto industry.

This week Romney’s campaign attacked on the issue, releasing an ad claiming that the bailout had led to Chrysler – which had been bought out by Fiat – transferring jobs to China.

The ad is not entirely true, as the plant in China is expanding to increase output to feed demand from the burgeoning Chinese middle class. Jobs are not being transferred from the US to China, they are being created in China.

But electoral politics is a killing ground for such nuance, and though the ad has been torn apart by the fact-checkers that have been so much a part of this campaign, the response of Romney’s team has been to ramp up their broadcasting in Ohio. Clearly strategists believe it is working.

Two days after the November 6 election the Chinese Communist Party will begin its own leadership transition at the Great Hall of the People (should be renamed The Great Hall of the Ruling Class). The 18th Party Congress, from November 8 (eight is Chinese auspicious number) to 14, will be immediately followed by the unveiling of the new general secretary, Xi Jinping, and the expected new Premier, Li Keqiang, and their team, on November 15. The personalities and positions that are set in Washington and Beijing will shape the world.

united states currency eye- IMG_7364_web

united states currency eye- IMG_7364_web (Photo credit: kevindean)

The coincidence of a US and China leadership transition is a once-in-40-year event (the Trilateral Commission will be looking to take advantage from). And it is happening at a historic moment when China is challenging the United States’ position as the world’s sole superpower.

If Xi can keep the ship on course, the Chinese economy may well overtake the United States as the world’s largest economy during his decade-long term. China. Every country in the region is scrambling to exploit, hedge and otherwise adjust its bearings.

”The weight of the world’s economy (especially since Gillard has pledged Australia will help bail out Greece at taxpayer expense) is genuinely moving in our direction,” the Prime Minister, Julia Gillard, said this week, unveiling her new white paper (hiding a dark lie – Fabian Socialists are black wolves in white sheep’s clothing – their insignia) on the Asia Century. ”When we map (UN Agenda 21 is mapping the world into regions within regions devolving control for implementation of Agenda 21 to the local governments masquerading as councils masquerading as Corporate entities) the centre of gravity of global consumption (could we see a Pole Shift?) we see it is shifting east by more than 100 miles a year.”

Inevitably, where economic power goes, strategic and military power follow. The global centre of military fire power is shifting towards this region almost as fast as GDP. Canberra has been at the vanguard of building and reinvigorating a latticework of regional security relationships, anchored in the might of the United States. A year ago Obama chose the Australian Parliament as the venue to announce his foreign policy ”pivot” (read war mongering) to Asia.

”The possibility that we could devolve into a much more confrontational relationship is at one of the highest points than at any time since the opening of relations,” says Bates Gill (an ancronym for Bill Gates), the newly arrived CEO of the US studies centre (an agent for the Trilaterial Commission?) at the University of Sydney, who is also an expert on China security issues.

The Obama administration and the Gillard government have been at pains to avoid naming China as the reason (Fabian Socialists prefer deceit over outright violence).. But others aren’t so reticent.

United (States) Parcel Service.

United (States) Parcel Service. (Photo credit: matt.hintsa)

”Australians view themselves as facing a strategic threat (yes, Australia’s agricultural land is being acquired by the Chinese) – this time from a China that is growing in every way and very fast, and that shows every sign of wanting to expand territorially as well,” the Pentagon consultant Ed Luttwak writes in a new book, The Rise of China vs The Logic of Strategy.

Dennis Richardson, the outgoing secretary of the Department of Foreign Affairs, told his new cadets earlier this year that the rivalry between the two powers would last longer than the Cold War and it would not simply ”evolve so you can tie a ribbon on top”, according to a source in the room. ”The dynamics of the US-China relationship will shape your entire careers,” said Richardson, who has recently moved to run the Department Defence.

The realignment of diplomatic and military power will be more complex and fluid than the Cold War with the Soviets. Growing US-China rivalry is accompanied by growing interdependency (Rothschilds and bankers are back funding both sides,again).

It is no coincidence that Richardson sent two of his top China hands to key American posts. Graeme Fletcher, the former deputy head of mission at the Australian embassy in Beijing, is now the deputy in Washington. The international adviser to former prime minister Kevin Rudd, Scott Dewar, is consul-general in Honolulu, where his job is to liaise with the US Pacific Command as it deploys its six aircraft carrier strike groups, 180 ships and 1500 aircraft across half of the globe.

In June, in Singapore, the US Defence Secretary, Leon Panetta (who admitted to US Congress that he takes his orders from the United Nations), flagged a ”rebalancing” that would see 60 per cent of US naval assets positioned in the Pacific.

And in a fortnight Panetta and the outgoing US Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton (treasonous whore), are scheduled to fly to Perth for the Ausmin (read ANZAC Alliance) strategic dialogue. They are pencilled in to dine with Gillard (Queen of the Fabian Socialists Australian Chapter) on November 14, after discussions with the Foreign Affairs Minister, Bob Carr (treasonous blood sucking bureaucrat), and Defence Minister, Stephen Smith.

Professor Gill says both countries will likely be ”quietly exploring” ways to increase intelligence co-operation, upgrade co-operation in operating space-related assets from Australian soil, and also enhance the capacity to maintain and re-supply American naval vessels.

It is unlikely that they will use the occasion to act on a suggestion in a recent report to the Pentagon that the local deep-water port, HMAS Stirling, will be expanded to accommodate US aircraft carriers.

The Australian ambassador to Beijing, Frances Adamson, said this week that Smith would not be making any surprise announcements about deepening military ties. Mr Smith’s press releases, she said, ”are not necessarily the sorts of things that make you swing into print and write front-page stories” (so read he will be making plans but they’re secret so forget asking about it, if you live in Australia you have no Right to Information, which used to be known as Freedom of Information)..

Not, at least, on the eve of Xi Jinping’s rise to power.

Until the start of this year the consensus among political analysts was that China would have a smooth leadership changeover, any differences safely locked away behind closed doors. This transition, however, is the first in the history of the People’s Republic that has not been orchestrated by the founding fathers of the 1949 revolution (Uhmm… very interesting!!!).

united states currency seal - IMG_7366_web

united states currency seal – IMG_7366_web (Photo credit: kevindean)

It is shaping as an epic contest at a moment of growing social, economic and political tension and uncertainty. And whereas America’s presidential candidates slog it out in public, with clear and independently (yeah, right, independent … as if!!!) enforced rules, China’s political adversaries face off against each other inside the same tent (read within the Chinese mafia families) and without enforceable ground rules (they make the rules up as they go along).

The Chinese political scandals (NO … no … not in China!?) that have leaked out from the black box this year make Romney’s tax problems look trivial.

They include the highest level attempted defection in 40 years (who attempted to defect, to where, and for what reason?); a murder of an English businessman (by the wife of a Politburo member); a top party official covering up his son’s death in an exploding Ferrari (reportedly with two semi-clad women) and foreign media expose´s that separately found that the families of two of the top leaders controlled billion-dollar fortunes. And then Xi Jinping failed to emerge in public for a fortnight.

”The poor (everyone, altogether now …. aawhh) guy – it’s like Obama four years ago – facing a completely impossible array of challenges,” Professor Geremie Barme, director of the Australian National University’s centre on China in the world, says. ”That’s probably why he took a sickie (a forced holiday under whose hand?) a few weeks ago,” he said, referring to Xi’s two-week disappearance from the public stage, which remains entirely unexplained.

”It is a state of extreme chaos,” said one Beijing political watcher, Li Weidong. ”There is nobody in absolute control.”  (Oh yes there is, we just can’t see them)

While the American contestants are sometimes reacting crudely to the fact of China’s rapidly accumulating power, those in China seem more preoccupied with their own fragility. Chinese leaders have responded by bolstering their personal and collective defences with the strongest, crudest and most dangerous display of nationalism in decades.

Japan has been the target (by CIA ot MI6?) of shrill propaganda and state-sponsored protests, over the Diaoyu/Senkaku Islands, but the spectre of America has been hovering in the background. Chinese politicians and regional security analysts see regional affairs almost entirely through the prism (looking glass = Alice in Wonderland = Crystal Ball) of what they see as the US defending its hegemony against the rising power of China.

That’s why many observers see the dispute ”as a time bomb planted by the US (told you it was the CIA) between China and Japan”, a retired senior Chinese official told foreign reporters in Hong Kong this week. ”That time bomb is now exploding or about to explode.” (read – war is imminent)

If China has emerged as a feature in American politics, then the US is China’s obsession, the measure of the country’s achievement and also the imagined ”enemy” by which it defines itself (the Rothschild bankers want control of China’s currency and banks).

”It has been a constant and strong belief that the US has sinister designs (CIA interference) to sabotage the Communist leadership and turn China into its vassal (impotent) state,” as Wang Jisi, a foreign policy adviser to a former Chinese president, explained in a candid report for the Brookings Institution (implicated in the New World Order conspiracy) earlier this year.

And while the children of the party elite are travelling in droves to study in the United States, the party itself sees the very existence of the US as a challenge to its monopoly on power. Party leaders seem to have even made a pact with each other – like a gang, or a cult (or the mafia) – that they would not succumb to American ideas.

”We have made a solemn declaration,” said China’s low profile second-ranked leader, Wu Bangguo, last year, ”that we will not employ a system of multiple parties holding office in rotation; diversify our guiding thought; separate executive, legislative and judicial powers; use a bicameral or federal system; or carry out privatisation.”

Later in 2011, Obama responded with his ”pivot” speech in Canberra, which outlined all the things that China’s leaders insist that they will resist.

”Certain rights are universal; among them, freedom of speech, freedom of the press, freedom of assembly, freedom of religion, and the freedom of citizens to choose their own leaders,” Obama said (the same Obama who signed into law the NDAA, National Defence Authorisation Act which denies those subjected to it a trial, or to even know what they have been charged with). Within months of the speech the first US Marines arrived in Darwin.

If the 2008 US election was about hope and change then this year’s ambitions are far more modest (read quiet and/or grandiose). Obama is fighting a rear-guard action (actions behind the scenes to impeach him) to protect what change he managed to grind through the recalcitrant Congress he was left with after 2010, when in the midterm elections he was punished for all that he had already done and all that he had failed to do.

Romney, ignoring his own bold record on health reform as governor of Massachusetts, argues that his business experience qualifies him to cut unemployment, deficit and debt. He boasts the ambitions of a bookkeeper. His broad approach to China seems unlikely to diverge much from Obama’s, despite some occasional rhetorical excursions.

In his book No Apology – effectively a job application published two years ago, he quixotically describes how in 2006 the former US ambassador to China Clark Randt jnr told him that many Chinese believe that their nation contains an energy – much the same as an individual does – and that when that energy is blocked the nation becomes ill.

”When foreigners cut off Tibet, Hong Kong and Taiwan, this theory holds the weakened China and prevented it from regaining its past greatness,” Romney writes.

Mostly, however, Romney is re-phrasing Obama policy.

”It is in our best interests to draw China into the circle of responsible nations and, at the same time, to strengthen our capacity to intervene in Asia, if necessary, to prevent China from imposing its will on independent nations,” he writes.

Mitt-Romney

Mitt-Romney (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

One of Romney’s advisers is Aaron L. Friedberg, (Picture shows Mitt Romney and ?) who served as a national security advisor to then vice-president Dick Cheney (the man at the helm during numerous atrocities) between 2003 and 2005. In September Friedberg, now a Princeton professor of public and international affairs, wrote in the journal Foreign Affairs that the ”responsible stakeholder” policy of integrating China was not working and that China’s at once ”arrogant and insecure” leadership was prompting increased tension in the Pacific and had failed to help America solve its key diplomatic problems, particularly North Korea’s and Iran’s nuclear programs.

Friedberg says China’s leadership is determined to overtake America as the dominant regional power – a situation he says America could not and should not abide. He suggests America should adopt a policy of standing its ground, continuing its engagement with China while increasing its force in the region, specifically by increasing its military investment and deepening its alliances in the region, and by supporting arms purchases (war is good business for the globalists) by those allies.

This sounds like Obama’s ”pivot” announced during an address to the Australian Parliament, which Friedberg dismisses as a largely symbolic (read real) transfer of existing forces. It is perhaps a pivot, but with more teeth.

This heavily contested American election may not change the world (how can it when both Obama and Romney are globalist puppets) but the ”selection” in China, in contrast, where there is only one party – the possibilities seem wide open.  (expect another False Flag?)

Xi’s treatment of the US will, to a large extent, define the China that he rules for the coming decade. The relationship will shape the world.

On the banks of the Mississippi they reckon that Xi is not a man who pits himself against America.

After his recent visit to Muscatine The New York Times noted dryly that it constituted something of a propaganda coup, a ”tightly choreographed moment” intended to demonstrate his deep connection with the American heartland.

Well, perhaps. But Mrs Lande does not doubt Xi’s sincerity.

”When he walked in the door, the smile the greeting, the handshake, it was so warm,” she said. ”We could see he was so happy to see us. It jumped out of him.”  (Good actor)

Amerika’s Future is Death

Article by Dr. Paul Craig Roberts
“The day we see truth and do not speak is the day we begin to die.”
– Martin Luther KingEnglish: Seal of the United States Department ...

Conspiracy theories have now blossomed into what the smug presstitute media calls a “conspiracy culture.” According to the presstitutes, Americans have to find some explanation for their frustrations and failings, so Americans shift the blame to the Bilderbergers, the Rothschilds, the New World Order and so forth and so on.

Readers will not be surprised that I disagree with the presstitutes. Indeed, the conspiracy culture is the product of the presstitute media’s failure to investigate and to report truthfully. I am certain that the Western media is worse than the Soviet media was. The Soviet media devised ways for helping the public to read between the lines, whereas the Western media is so proud to be confidants of the government that they deliver the propaganda without any clues to the readers that it is propaganda.

Americans have been fed lies by “their” government and the government’s presstitute media for so long that it is not surprising that Americans increasingly believe that there is a conspiracy operating against them. Millions of Americans have been evicted from their jobs, careers, and homes while the crooks who stole from them run free and bankroll the presidential candidates. The world as millions of Americans knew it has come to an end, and no one has been held accountable. The explanation that Americans get from the media is that it is their own fault. They bought houses they shouldn’t have bought, and they didn’t train for the right jobs. It is not unreasonable for Americans to conclude that a conspiracy is operating against them.

Americans are told that “their” government cannot afford to help them because of the budget deficit and the burden on our grandchildren. But Americans see the trillions of dollars that are lavished on banksters, on wars, and on Homeland Security. Why is a police state and another attack on another Muslim country more important than keeping Americans in their jobs and in their homes?

Cover of "9/11 [Region 2]"

The 11th anniversary of 9/11 is less than a month away. Will the presstitute media remind Americans that the government has spent $6 trillion of Americans’ money in out-of-pocket and already incurred future costs as the expense of invading and trying to occupy Afghanistan and Iraq, all to no effect except to enrich the managements and shareholders of the military security complex at the cost of destroying the reputation of the United States and putting Social Security and Medicare on the chopping block?

No, of course not. The spiel will be about our brave troops who are fighting and dying to make the world safe for democracy and women’s rights. Washington will wrap itself in the flag and exhort Americans to “support our troops” in the orchestrated war of the day. Hitlery Clinton still gets on the moral high horse and rails at China and Russia, but all the world sees is hypocrisy. No one, not even Washington’s puppet governments, any longer takes Washington’s moralizing as anything more than a mask for domination by force alone. Democracy, Washington declares, comes out of the barrel of a gun.

Today moralizing is all about money, but not for the 99%. The 99% cannot find good jobs or earn anything on their savings, because the economy is run for the 1%. University graduates cannot get jobs and pay off their student loans. Retraining for the millions of Americans whose jobs were shipped offshore or filled by foreigners brought in on H1-B visas has proved to be a fraud, as there are no jobs for the retrained displaced long-term discouraged American work force. The official jobs projection by the US government is that few university graduates are needed in the work force, so the old mantra that “education is the answer” is just another lie from the Ivy League economic departments who sell the establishment’s lies for money.

Any American citizen accustomed to travel America’s “wide open spaces” prior to 9/11 must be astonished by the sudden rise of the intrusive Homeland Security, a gestapo-sounding name if there ever was one. Porno-scans and genital feel-ups have spread from airports to bus and train stations and to the public highways, despite the absence of terrorist events. No one in their right mind could possibly think that a 90-year old grandmother in a wheel chair is a terrorist whose diaper needs to be checked or that blond and blue-eyed parents would have strapped a bomb around their 5-year old daughter’s waist. No one except the gestapo Department of Homeland Security.

Gestapo pins

Even some of the gullible flag-waving patriotic conservatives are beginning to wonder about all the security. The reports that the Department of Homeland Security has ordered 750 million rounds of people-killing ammunition are puzzling even those conservatives who have been taking vicarious pleasure in the slaughter of “towelheads.”

Why does the Department of Homeland Security need enough ammunition to shoot every American 2.5 times? Why is Homeland Security equipping itself with full-body armor? Why is Homeland Security acquiring new laser technology that can “instantly know everything about you from 164 feet away?” A new army manual for “Civil Disturbance Operations” describes how the military is to be used domestically within the US to put down protests, confiscate firearms and kill citizens.

The police state that is being constructed in “freedom and democracy” America is without parallel in history. When the only terrorists are dupes organized by the FBI, it is clear that the purpose of the police state is not to protect Americans from Muslim terrorists. The purpose of the police state is to terrorize US citizens.

It is not only Homeland Security that is being militarized. The government reported that a large ammunition order was made by the National Weather Service, later updated to have been the Fisheries Office. If you are surprised at this, why has the Social Security Administration ordered 174,000 rounds of hollow-point bullets?

continue at PaulCraigRoberts.org:

Fair Use Notice: This post contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.